New Jersey’s road to abolition

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

New Jersey reinstated capital punishment in 1982. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed nearly every capital conviction that it reviewed between 1982 and 2007. Twenty-five years later, on December 17, 2007, the State of New Jersey officially abolished the death penalty and replaced it with life without the possibility of parole. This article examines multiple converging factors that contributed to abolition, including the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision making in capital cases, public-opinion data, political conditions, and the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission hearings and report. This article suggests that New Jersey judicial decision making fostered a culture of ambivalence toward capital punishment, which, when combined with a host of unique political and social factors, made abolition possible.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)408-422
Number of pages15
JournalJustice System Journal
Volume29
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2008

Fingerprint

death penalty
Supreme Court
penalty
decision making
political factors
court decision
ambivalence
social factors
public opinion

Cite this

Henry, Jessica S. / New Jersey’s road to abolition. In: Justice System Journal. 2008 ; Vol. 29, No. 3. pp. 408-422.
@article{2a1c4d27422c4efe879e76d7ac652339,
title = "New Jersey’s road to abolition",
abstract = "New Jersey reinstated capital punishment in 1982. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed nearly every capital conviction that it reviewed between 1982 and 2007. Twenty-five years later, on December 17, 2007, the State of New Jersey officially abolished the death penalty and replaced it with life without the possibility of parole. This article examines multiple converging factors that contributed to abolition, including the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision making in capital cases, public-opinion data, political conditions, and the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission hearings and report. This article suggests that New Jersey judicial decision making fostered a culture of ambivalence toward capital punishment, which, when combined with a host of unique political and social factors, made abolition possible.",
author = "Henry, {Jessica S}",
year = "2008",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/0098261X.2008.10767904",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "408--422",
journal = "Justice System Journal",
issn = "0098-261X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

New Jersey’s road to abolition. / Henry, Jessica S.

In: Justice System Journal, Vol. 29, No. 3, 01.01.2008, p. 408-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - New Jersey’s road to abolition

AU - Henry, Jessica S

PY - 2008/1/1

Y1 - 2008/1/1

N2 - New Jersey reinstated capital punishment in 1982. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed nearly every capital conviction that it reviewed between 1982 and 2007. Twenty-five years later, on December 17, 2007, the State of New Jersey officially abolished the death penalty and replaced it with life without the possibility of parole. This article examines multiple converging factors that contributed to abolition, including the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision making in capital cases, public-opinion data, political conditions, and the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission hearings and report. This article suggests that New Jersey judicial decision making fostered a culture of ambivalence toward capital punishment, which, when combined with a host of unique political and social factors, made abolition possible.

AB - New Jersey reinstated capital punishment in 1982. The New Jersey Supreme Court reversed nearly every capital conviction that it reviewed between 1982 and 2007. Twenty-five years later, on December 17, 2007, the State of New Jersey officially abolished the death penalty and replaced it with life without the possibility of parole. This article examines multiple converging factors that contributed to abolition, including the New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision making in capital cases, public-opinion data, political conditions, and the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission hearings and report. This article suggests that New Jersey judicial decision making fostered a culture of ambivalence toward capital punishment, which, when combined with a host of unique political and social factors, made abolition possible.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=56049113033&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/0098261X.2008.10767904

DO - 10.1080/0098261X.2008.10767904

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 408

EP - 422

JO - Justice System Journal

JF - Justice System Journal

SN - 0098-261X

IS - 3

ER -