Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure

Joshua Sandry; Jeremy Schwark; Gayle Hunt; Kasha Geels; Stephen Rice

doi:10.1177/1071181311551297

Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure

Joshua Sandry, Jeremy Schwark, Gayle Hunt, Kasha Geels, Stephen Rice

Psychology

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Research exploring factors that affect an operator's use of automated systems has gained a great deal of attention over the years; however, it is only recently that an operator's simultaneous use of multiple automated aids has been investigated. The current study employed a target search task to examine how individuals utilize two automated aids when one of the aids fails and begins to decrease in reliability. More specifically, we were interested in investigating whether people would be able to switch from utilizing the failing aid (originally highly reliable) to the other aid (originally less reliable) when the failing aid became less reliable than the other aid. The results show that participants were able to consistently use the more reliable aid, even if this meant switching from one aid to the other. Practical implications are discussed.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, HFES 2011
Pages	1427-1431
Number of pages	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551297
State	Published - 28 Nov 2011
Event	55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2011 - Las Vegas, NV, United States Duration: 19 Sep 2011 → 23 Sep 2011

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
ISSN (Print)	1071-1813

Other

Other	55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2011
Country/Territory	United States
City	Las Vegas, NV
Period	19/09/11 → 23/09/11

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1177/1071181311551297

Cite this

@inproceedings{d15b3bf5d1524feab791a438d71bafe7,

title = "Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure",

abstract = "Research exploring factors that affect an operator's use of automated systems has gained a great deal of attention over the years; however, it is only recently that an operator's simultaneous use of multiple automated aids has been investigated. The current study employed a target search task to examine how individuals utilize two automated aids when one of the aids fails and begins to decrease in reliability. More specifically, we were interested in investigating whether people would be able to switch from utilizing the failing aid (originally highly reliable) to the other aid (originally less reliable) when the failing aid became less reliable than the other aid. The results show that participants were able to consistently use the more reliable aid, even if this meant switching from one aid to the other. Practical implications are discussed.",

author = "Joshua Sandry and Jeremy Schwark and Gayle Hunt and Kasha Geels and Stephen Rice",

year = "2011",

month = nov,

day = "28",

doi = "10.1177/1071181311551297",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780945289395",

series = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",

pages = "1427--1431",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, HFES 2011",

note = "null ; Conference date: 19-09-2011 Through 23-09-2011",

}

Sandry, J, Schwark, J, Hunt, G, Geels, K & Rice, S 2011, Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, HFES 2011. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1427-1431, 55th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2011, Las Vegas, NV, United States, 19/09/11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071181311551297

Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure. / Sandry, Joshua; Schwark, Jeremy; Hunt, Gayle et al.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, HFES 2011. 2011. p. 1427-1431 (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure

AU - Sandry, Joshua

AU - Schwark, Jeremy

AU - Hunt, Gayle

AU - Geels, Kasha

AU - Rice, Stephen

PY - 2011/11/28

Y1 - 2011/11/28

N2 - Research exploring factors that affect an operator's use of automated systems has gained a great deal of attention over the years; however, it is only recently that an operator's simultaneous use of multiple automated aids has been investigated. The current study employed a target search task to examine how individuals utilize two automated aids when one of the aids fails and begins to decrease in reliability. More specifically, we were interested in investigating whether people would be able to switch from utilizing the failing aid (originally highly reliable) to the other aid (originally less reliable) when the failing aid became less reliable than the other aid. The results show that participants were able to consistently use the more reliable aid, even if this meant switching from one aid to the other. Practical implications are discussed.

AB - Research exploring factors that affect an operator's use of automated systems has gained a great deal of attention over the years; however, it is only recently that an operator's simultaneous use of multiple automated aids has been investigated. The current study employed a target search task to examine how individuals utilize two automated aids when one of the aids fails and begins to decrease in reliability. More specifically, we were interested in investigating whether people would be able to switch from utilizing the failing aid (originally highly reliable) to the other aid (originally less reliable) when the failing aid became less reliable than the other aid. The results show that participants were able to consistently use the more reliable aid, even if this meant switching from one aid to the other. Practical implications are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=81855185934&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1071181311551297

DO - 10.1177/1071181311551297

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:81855185934

SN - 9780945289395

T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

SP - 1427

EP - 1431

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 55th Annual Meeting, HFES 2011

Y2 - 19 September 2011 through 23 September 2011

ER -

Operator aid-switching in a case of redundant automation with single-aid failure

Abstract

Publication series

Other

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this