Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction

A review of the literature

Kristen D. Ritchey, Jennifer Goeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Orton-Gillingham (OG) and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instructional programs are commonly implemented reading programs in the United States. Twelve studies that employed quasi-experimental or experimental designs are reviewed. These studies included elementary students, adolescents, and college students. Of the 12 studies, 5 reported that the OG instruction was more effective than were comparison or control interventions for all measured outcomes, 4 reported that the OG instruction was more effective for at least 1 (but not all) outcomes in comparison to other intervention(s), 2 reported that the alternate instruction was more effective than the OG instruction, and 1 reported no significant differences once covariates were included. The largest effects were reported for word attack and non-word reading outcomes, with mean effect size of .82, and comprehension outcomes, with a mean effect size of .76. Following a summary of each study, limitations of the current review and implications for future research and practice are described. Given the small number of studies, the lack of methodological rigor of the existing studies, and the inconclusive findings of the effectiveness of OG programs, additional research is needed before the scientific basis can be established.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-183
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Special Education
Volume40
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2006

Fingerprint

reading instruction
Reading
instruction
Students
Research Design
comprehension
student
adolescent
Research
literature
lack

Cite this

@article{f69061e66c104415bcf980682766769e,
title = "Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction: A review of the literature",
abstract = "Orton-Gillingham (OG) and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instructional programs are commonly implemented reading programs in the United States. Twelve studies that employed quasi-experimental or experimental designs are reviewed. These studies included elementary students, adolescents, and college students. Of the 12 studies, 5 reported that the OG instruction was more effective than were comparison or control interventions for all measured outcomes, 4 reported that the OG instruction was more effective for at least 1 (but not all) outcomes in comparison to other intervention(s), 2 reported that the alternate instruction was more effective than the OG instruction, and 1 reported no significant differences once covariates were included. The largest effects were reported for word attack and non-word reading outcomes, with mean effect size of .82, and comprehension outcomes, with a mean effect size of .76. Following a summary of each study, limitations of the current review and implications for future research and practice are described. Given the small number of studies, the lack of methodological rigor of the existing studies, and the inconclusive findings of the effectiveness of OG programs, additional research is needed before the scientific basis can be established.",
author = "Ritchey, {Kristen D.} and Jennifer Goeke",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/00224669060400030501",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "171--183",
journal = "Journal of Special Education",
issn = "0022-4669",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction : A review of the literature. / Ritchey, Kristen D.; Goeke, Jennifer.

In: Journal of Special Education, Vol. 40, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 171-183.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instruction

T2 - A review of the literature

AU - Ritchey, Kristen D.

AU - Goeke, Jennifer

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Orton-Gillingham (OG) and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instructional programs are commonly implemented reading programs in the United States. Twelve studies that employed quasi-experimental or experimental designs are reviewed. These studies included elementary students, adolescents, and college students. Of the 12 studies, 5 reported that the OG instruction was more effective than were comparison or control interventions for all measured outcomes, 4 reported that the OG instruction was more effective for at least 1 (but not all) outcomes in comparison to other intervention(s), 2 reported that the alternate instruction was more effective than the OG instruction, and 1 reported no significant differences once covariates were included. The largest effects were reported for word attack and non-word reading outcomes, with mean effect size of .82, and comprehension outcomes, with a mean effect size of .76. Following a summary of each study, limitations of the current review and implications for future research and practice are described. Given the small number of studies, the lack of methodological rigor of the existing studies, and the inconclusive findings of the effectiveness of OG programs, additional research is needed before the scientific basis can be established.

AB - Orton-Gillingham (OG) and Orton-Gillingham-based reading instructional programs are commonly implemented reading programs in the United States. Twelve studies that employed quasi-experimental or experimental designs are reviewed. These studies included elementary students, adolescents, and college students. Of the 12 studies, 5 reported that the OG instruction was more effective than were comparison or control interventions for all measured outcomes, 4 reported that the OG instruction was more effective for at least 1 (but not all) outcomes in comparison to other intervention(s), 2 reported that the alternate instruction was more effective than the OG instruction, and 1 reported no significant differences once covariates were included. The largest effects were reported for word attack and non-word reading outcomes, with mean effect size of .82, and comprehension outcomes, with a mean effect size of .76. Following a summary of each study, limitations of the current review and implications for future research and practice are described. Given the small number of studies, the lack of methodological rigor of the existing studies, and the inconclusive findings of the effectiveness of OG programs, additional research is needed before the scientific basis can be established.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33750980698&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/00224669060400030501

DO - 10.1177/00224669060400030501

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 171

EP - 183

JO - Journal of Special Education

JF - Journal of Special Education

SN - 0022-4669

IS - 3

ER -