Past tense formation in Williams syndrome

Michael S.C. Thomas, Julia Grant, Zita Barham, Marisa Gsödl, Emma Laing, Laura Lakusta, Lorraine K. Tyler, Sarah Grice, Sarah Paterson, Annette Karmiloff-Smith

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

102 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

It has been claimed that in the language systems of people with Williams syndrome (WS), syntax is intact but lexical memory is impaired. Evidence has come from past tense elicitation tasks with a small number of participants where individuals with WS are said to have a specific deficit in forming irregular past tenses. However, typically developing children also show poorer performance on irregulars than regulars in these tasks, and one of the central features of WS language development is that it is delayed. We compared the performance of 21 participants with WS on two past tense elicitation tasks with that of four typically developing control groups, at ages 6, 8, 10, and adult. When verbal mental age was controlled for, participants in the WS group displayed no selective deficit in irregular past tense performance. However, there was evidence for lower levels of generalisation to novel strings. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the WS language system is delayed because it has developed under different constraints, constraints that perhaps include atypical phonological representations. The results are discussed in relation to dual-mechanism and connectionist computational models of language development, and to the possible differential weight given to phonology versus semantics in WS development.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-176
Number of pages34
JournalLanguage and Cognitive Processes
Volume16
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2001

Fingerprint

Williams Syndrome
language
deficit
Language Development
performance
phonology
syntax
Language
evidence
Group
semantics
Neural Networks (Computer)
Past Tense
Semantics
Weights and Measures
Control Groups

Cite this

Thomas, M. S. C., Grant, J., Barham, Z., Gsödl, M., Laing, E., Lakusta, L., ... Karmiloff-Smith, A. (2001). Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes, 16(2-3), 143-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000021
Thomas, Michael S.C. ; Grant, Julia ; Barham, Zita ; Gsödl, Marisa ; Laing, Emma ; Lakusta, Laura ; Tyler, Lorraine K. ; Grice, Sarah ; Paterson, Sarah ; Karmiloff-Smith, Annette. / Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. In: Language and Cognitive Processes. 2001 ; Vol. 16, No. 2-3. pp. 143-176.
@article{70fb9f77a34d47f28131b2925f903bdf,
title = "Past tense formation in Williams syndrome",
abstract = "It has been claimed that in the language systems of people with Williams syndrome (WS), syntax is intact but lexical memory is impaired. Evidence has come from past tense elicitation tasks with a small number of participants where individuals with WS are said to have a specific deficit in forming irregular past tenses. However, typically developing children also show poorer performance on irregulars than regulars in these tasks, and one of the central features of WS language development is that it is delayed. We compared the performance of 21 participants with WS on two past tense elicitation tasks with that of four typically developing control groups, at ages 6, 8, 10, and adult. When verbal mental age was controlled for, participants in the WS group displayed no selective deficit in irregular past tense performance. However, there was evidence for lower levels of generalisation to novel strings. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the WS language system is delayed because it has developed under different constraints, constraints that perhaps include atypical phonological representations. The results are discussed in relation to dual-mechanism and connectionist computational models of language development, and to the possible differential weight given to phonology versus semantics in WS development.",
author = "Thomas, {Michael S.C.} and Julia Grant and Zita Barham and Marisa Gs{\"o}dl and Emma Laing and Laura Lakusta and Tyler, {Lorraine K.} and Sarah Grice and Sarah Paterson and Annette Karmiloff-Smith",
year = "2001",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01690960042000021",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "143--176",
journal = "Language and Cognitive Processes",
issn = "0169-0965",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "2-3",

}

Thomas, MSC, Grant, J, Barham, Z, Gsödl, M, Laing, E, Lakusta, L, Tyler, LK, Grice, S, Paterson, S & Karmiloff-Smith, A 2001, 'Past tense formation in Williams syndrome', Language and Cognitive Processes, vol. 16, no. 2-3, pp. 143-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000021

Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. / Thomas, Michael S.C.; Grant, Julia; Barham, Zita; Gsödl, Marisa; Laing, Emma; Lakusta, Laura; Tyler, Lorraine K.; Grice, Sarah; Paterson, Sarah; Karmiloff-Smith, Annette.

In: Language and Cognitive Processes, Vol. 16, No. 2-3, 01.04.2001, p. 143-176.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Past tense formation in Williams syndrome

AU - Thomas, Michael S.C.

AU - Grant, Julia

AU - Barham, Zita

AU - Gsödl, Marisa

AU - Laing, Emma

AU - Lakusta, Laura

AU - Tyler, Lorraine K.

AU - Grice, Sarah

AU - Paterson, Sarah

AU - Karmiloff-Smith, Annette

PY - 2001/4/1

Y1 - 2001/4/1

N2 - It has been claimed that in the language systems of people with Williams syndrome (WS), syntax is intact but lexical memory is impaired. Evidence has come from past tense elicitation tasks with a small number of participants where individuals with WS are said to have a specific deficit in forming irregular past tenses. However, typically developing children also show poorer performance on irregulars than regulars in these tasks, and one of the central features of WS language development is that it is delayed. We compared the performance of 21 participants with WS on two past tense elicitation tasks with that of four typically developing control groups, at ages 6, 8, 10, and adult. When verbal mental age was controlled for, participants in the WS group displayed no selective deficit in irregular past tense performance. However, there was evidence for lower levels of generalisation to novel strings. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the WS language system is delayed because it has developed under different constraints, constraints that perhaps include atypical phonological representations. The results are discussed in relation to dual-mechanism and connectionist computational models of language development, and to the possible differential weight given to phonology versus semantics in WS development.

AB - It has been claimed that in the language systems of people with Williams syndrome (WS), syntax is intact but lexical memory is impaired. Evidence has come from past tense elicitation tasks with a small number of participants where individuals with WS are said to have a specific deficit in forming irregular past tenses. However, typically developing children also show poorer performance on irregulars than regulars in these tasks, and one of the central features of WS language development is that it is delayed. We compared the performance of 21 participants with WS on two past tense elicitation tasks with that of four typically developing control groups, at ages 6, 8, 10, and adult. When verbal mental age was controlled for, participants in the WS group displayed no selective deficit in irregular past tense performance. However, there was evidence for lower levels of generalisation to novel strings. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the WS language system is delayed because it has developed under different constraints, constraints that perhaps include atypical phonological representations. The results are discussed in relation to dual-mechanism and connectionist computational models of language development, and to the possible differential weight given to phonology versus semantics in WS development.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035023910&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01690960042000021

DO - 10.1080/01690960042000021

M3 - Article

VL - 16

SP - 143

EP - 176

JO - Language and Cognitive Processes

JF - Language and Cognitive Processes

SN - 0169-0965

IS - 2-3

ER -

Thomas MSC, Grant J, Barham Z, Gsödl M, Laing E, Lakusta L et al. Past tense formation in Williams syndrome. Language and Cognitive Processes. 2001 Apr 1;16(2-3):143-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000021