Phrases vs meaning in the immediate recall of sentences

David Townsend, Eli Saltz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study evaluated Johnson’s (1965) measure of phrase independence in the recall of sentences. Twenty-five Ss were presented with groups of three sentences that differed in structure and were immediately asked to recall the sentences. Fewer errors were made on subject, verb, and object words for all sentence types, but the probability of a transitional error (TEP) at the phrase boundary was not always greater than at other transitions in the sentence. The results indicate that the TEP is a misleading measure and that sentence meaning is more appropriate as a unit of recall than is the sentence phrase. The number of underlying clauses in the sentence proved to be a valuable metric in predicting errors in recall.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)381-384
Number of pages4
JournalPsychonomic Science
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 1972

Fingerprint

tetraethylpyrazine

Cite this

Townsend, David ; Saltz, Eli. / Phrases vs meaning in the immediate recall of sentences. In: Psychonomic Science. 1972 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 381-384.
@article{c62342cc35c64089a103a780be531013,
title = "Phrases vs meaning in the immediate recall of sentences",
abstract = "This study evaluated Johnson’s (1965) measure of phrase independence in the recall of sentences. Twenty-five Ss were presented with groups of three sentences that differed in structure and were immediately asked to recall the sentences. Fewer errors were made on subject, verb, and object words for all sentence types, but the probability of a transitional error (TEP) at the phrase boundary was not always greater than at other transitions in the sentence. The results indicate that the TEP is a misleading measure and that sentence meaning is more appropriate as a unit of recall than is the sentence phrase. The number of underlying clauses in the sentence proved to be a valuable metric in predicting errors in recall.",
author = "David Townsend and Eli Saltz",
year = "1972",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3758/BF03336607",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "381--384",
journal = "Psychonomic Science",
issn = "0033-3131",
publisher = "Psychonomic Society Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Phrases vs meaning in the immediate recall of sentences. / Townsend, David; Saltz, Eli.

In: Psychonomic Science, Vol. 29, No. 6, 01.01.1972, p. 381-384.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phrases vs meaning in the immediate recall of sentences

AU - Townsend, David

AU - Saltz, Eli

PY - 1972/1/1

Y1 - 1972/1/1

N2 - This study evaluated Johnson’s (1965) measure of phrase independence in the recall of sentences. Twenty-five Ss were presented with groups of three sentences that differed in structure and were immediately asked to recall the sentences. Fewer errors were made on subject, verb, and object words for all sentence types, but the probability of a transitional error (TEP) at the phrase boundary was not always greater than at other transitions in the sentence. The results indicate that the TEP is a misleading measure and that sentence meaning is more appropriate as a unit of recall than is the sentence phrase. The number of underlying clauses in the sentence proved to be a valuable metric in predicting errors in recall.

AB - This study evaluated Johnson’s (1965) measure of phrase independence in the recall of sentences. Twenty-five Ss were presented with groups of three sentences that differed in structure and were immediately asked to recall the sentences. Fewer errors were made on subject, verb, and object words for all sentence types, but the probability of a transitional error (TEP) at the phrase boundary was not always greater than at other transitions in the sentence. The results indicate that the TEP is a misleading measure and that sentence meaning is more appropriate as a unit of recall than is the sentence phrase. The number of underlying clauses in the sentence proved to be a valuable metric in predicting errors in recall.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34248959039&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3758/BF03336607

DO - 10.3758/BF03336607

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:34248959039

VL - 29

SP - 381

EP - 384

JO - Psychonomic Science

JF - Psychonomic Science

SN - 0033-3131

IS - 6

ER -