Abstract
Using a case study method, the policy formation and implementation of litigation based system-wide reform of the Washington State and New Jersey child welfare agencies was examined within the context of the policy instruments component of Hasenfeld and Brock’s (1991) political-economy model. Primary findings and recommendations for improving the implementation process include: (a) clarifying weak and ambiguous authority structures by creating a policy agenda linking authority structures to specific plan components; (b) mitigating misalignment and under-resourcing of policy components by stipulating resource requirements within the litigated settlement agreement provisions; (c) strengthening the implementation process by aligning policy action steps and outcome measurements with available data sources and capabilities; and (d) structuring incremental change into the program design for policy reform to increase flexibility to respond to changing agency needs or unpredictable events.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 162-187 |
| Number of pages | 26 |
| Journal | Journal of Policy Practice |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2 Jul 2016 |
Keywords
- Case study analysis
- child welfare agency
- child welfare reform
- class action lawsuit
- litigated reform
- litigation
- performance
- policy implementation
- public administration
- public policy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Policy Implementation Under Class Action-Based Reform of State Child Welfare Agencies: The Cases of Washington State and New Jersey'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver