Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the united states often do not persist

Keyphrases

• United States 100%
• Popular 100%
• Performance-based Funding 100%
• State Performance 100%
• Funding System 100%
• Higher Education 63%
• State Finance 18%
• Florida 9%
• Question Focus 9%
• Minority Groups 9%
• Performance Improvement 9%
• Group Leader 9%
• Legislators 9%
• Governor 9%
• Giving up 9%
• Washington 9%
• Reaching out 9%
• Public Funding 9%
• Missouri 9%
• Existing State 9%
• K-12 9%
• Public Institutions 9%
• Higher Education Institutions 9%
• Social Groups 9%
• Tennessee 9%
• Educational Equality 9%
• Documentary Record 9%
• Funding Policy 9%
• Job Placement 9%
• Business Leaders 9%
• Educational Efficiency 9%
• Quality Assurance Program 9%
• Program Sustainability 9%
• State Appropriations 9%
• Institutional Performance 9%
• Performance Indicators 9%
• Holding Back 9%
• Higher Education Performance 9%
• Policy Termination 9%
• Revenue Cycle 9%
• Three-state 9%
• Policy Programs 9%
• Implementation Costs 9%
• Drop Performance 9%
• Political Support 9%
• Quality Assurance in Higher Education 9%
• State Revenues 9%

Social Sciences

• USA 100%
• Higher Education 100%
• Research Design 10%
• Minority Groups 10%
• K-12 Education 10%
• Finance 10%
• Educational Efficiency 10%
• Social Class 10%
• Quality Control 10%
• Funding Policy 10%
• Political Support 10%
• Quality Assurance 10%
• Research Question 10%
• Education Institution 10%
• Business Leader 10%
• Government Funding 10%