Popular but unstable: Explaining why state performance funding systems in the united states often do not persist

Social Sciences

• Research Design 100%
• Minority Groups 100%
• Autonomy 100%
• K-12 Education 100%
• Finance 100%
• Educational Efficiency 100%
• Social Class 100%
• Funding Policy 100%
• Political Support 100%
• Quality Assurance 100%

Keyphrases

• United States 100%
• Popular 100%
• Performance-based Funding 100%
• State Performance 100%
• Funding System 100%
• Higher Education 63%
• State Finance 18%
• Florida 9%
• Question Focus 9%
• Minority Groups 9%
• Performance Improvement 9%
• Group Leader 9%
• Invalid 9%
• Legislators 9%
• Three-state 9%
• Governor 9%
• Giving up 9%
• Washington 9%
• Reaching out 9%
• Public Funding 9%
• Missouri 9%
• Existing State 9%
• Policy Program 9%
• K-12 9%
• Public Institutions 9%
• Higher Education Institutions 9%
• Social Groups 9%
• Implementation Cost 9%
• Tennessee 9%
• Educational Equality 9%
• Documentary Record 9%
• Funding Policy 9%
• Job Placement 9%
• Business Leaders 9%
• Educational Efficiency 9%
• Quality Assurance Program 9%
• Program Sustainability 9%
• Education Assessment 9%
• State Appropriations 9%
• Political Support 9%
• Institutional Performance 9%
• Government Revenue 9%
• Performance Indicators 9%
• Holding Back 9%
• Higher Education Performance 9%
• Policy Termination 9%
• Revenue Cycle 9%

Economics, Econometrics and Finance

• Finance 100%
• Research Design 100%
• Higher Education Institution 100%
• Quality Management 100%