Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia

Thomas O. Ochuodho, Janaki R.R. Alavalapati, Pankaj Lal, Domena A. Agyeman, Bernabas Wolde, Pralhad Burli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The growing attention to renewable energy and rural development has created greater demand for production of biomass feedstock for bioenergy. However, forest growth rates and the amount of land in most existing forests may not be sufficient to sustainably supply the forest biomass required to support existing forest products industries and the expanding bioenergy industry. Additionally, concerns about agricultural land use competition have dampened expansion of biomass production on agricultural land base. One of the ways to meet the growing forest biomass feedstock demand for bioenergy production is by allocating currently marginal non-forested land for growing bioenergy feedstocks. In Virginia, about 80% of forestland is under nonindustrial private forest ownership. The land use allocation decisions of these private owners are critical for the supply of the forest biomass feedstock to support bioenergy production. We apply a computable general equilibrium model to assess the economy-wide impacts of forestland owners' willingness to plant pine on non-forested land for woody bioenergy in Virginia. We consider three counterfactual scenarios of biomass feedstock supply increase as intermediate demand for bioenergy production based on forestland owners' willingness to accept biomass bid prices to set aside more non-forested land for biomass production in Virginia under general equilibrium conditions. Overall, the results show an increase in social welfare and household utility but a marginal decline in GDP. However, increased demand of biomass from logging sector depressed the manufacturing sector (the wood manufacturing sub-sector particularly), which also relies on the logging sector for its intermediate inputs. Results from this study provide insights into the bioenergy land use competition debate, and pathways towards sustainable bioenergy feedstock supply.

Original languageEnglish
Article number159
JournalForests
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 13 Feb 2019

Fingerprint

bioenergy
economic impact
feedstocks
biomass production
biomass
land use
renewable energy sources
logging
agricultural land
manufacturing
forest ownership
private ownership
social welfare
bioenergy industry
nonindustrial private forests
forest products industry
forest growth
rural development
land
computable general equilibrium analysis

Keywords

  • Bioenergy
  • CGE model
  • Forest biomass
  • Land use change

Cite this

Ochuodho, T. O., Alavalapati, J. R. R., Lal, P., Agyeman, D. A., Wolde, B., & Burli, P. (2019). Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia. Forests, 10(2), [159]. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020159
Ochuodho, Thomas O. ; Alavalapati, Janaki R.R. ; Lal, Pankaj ; Agyeman, Domena A. ; Wolde, Bernabas ; Burli, Pralhad. / Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia. In: Forests. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 2.
@article{8c538a15f77946f68b9d9259eaeeee80,
title = "Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia",
abstract = "The growing attention to renewable energy and rural development has created greater demand for production of biomass feedstock for bioenergy. However, forest growth rates and the amount of land in most existing forests may not be sufficient to sustainably supply the forest biomass required to support existing forest products industries and the expanding bioenergy industry. Additionally, concerns about agricultural land use competition have dampened expansion of biomass production on agricultural land base. One of the ways to meet the growing forest biomass feedstock demand for bioenergy production is by allocating currently marginal non-forested land for growing bioenergy feedstocks. In Virginia, about 80{\%} of forestland is under nonindustrial private forest ownership. The land use allocation decisions of these private owners are critical for the supply of the forest biomass feedstock to support bioenergy production. We apply a computable general equilibrium model to assess the economy-wide impacts of forestland owners' willingness to plant pine on non-forested land for woody bioenergy in Virginia. We consider three counterfactual scenarios of biomass feedstock supply increase as intermediate demand for bioenergy production based on forestland owners' willingness to accept biomass bid prices to set aside more non-forested land for biomass production in Virginia under general equilibrium conditions. Overall, the results show an increase in social welfare and household utility but a marginal decline in GDP. However, increased demand of biomass from logging sector depressed the manufacturing sector (the wood manufacturing sub-sector particularly), which also relies on the logging sector for its intermediate inputs. Results from this study provide insights into the bioenergy land use competition debate, and pathways towards sustainable bioenergy feedstock supply.",
keywords = "Bioenergy, CGE model, Forest biomass, Land use change",
author = "Ochuodho, {Thomas O.} and Alavalapati, {Janaki R.R.} and Pankaj Lal and Agyeman, {Domena A.} and Bernabas Wolde and Pralhad Burli",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "13",
doi = "10.3390/f10020159",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
journal = "Forests",
issn = "1999-4907",
publisher = "MDPI AG",
number = "2",

}

Ochuodho, TO, Alavalapati, JRR, Lal, P, Agyeman, DA, Wolde, B & Burli, P 2019, 'Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia', Forests, vol. 10, no. 2, 159. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10020159

Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia. / Ochuodho, Thomas O.; Alavalapati, Janaki R.R.; Lal, Pankaj; Agyeman, Domena A.; Wolde, Bernabas; Burli, Pralhad.

In: Forests, Vol. 10, No. 2, 159, 13.02.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia

AU - Ochuodho, Thomas O.

AU - Alavalapati, Janaki R.R.

AU - Lal, Pankaj

AU - Agyeman, Domena A.

AU - Wolde, Bernabas

AU - Burli, Pralhad

PY - 2019/2/13

Y1 - 2019/2/13

N2 - The growing attention to renewable energy and rural development has created greater demand for production of biomass feedstock for bioenergy. However, forest growth rates and the amount of land in most existing forests may not be sufficient to sustainably supply the forest biomass required to support existing forest products industries and the expanding bioenergy industry. Additionally, concerns about agricultural land use competition have dampened expansion of biomass production on agricultural land base. One of the ways to meet the growing forest biomass feedstock demand for bioenergy production is by allocating currently marginal non-forested land for growing bioenergy feedstocks. In Virginia, about 80% of forestland is under nonindustrial private forest ownership. The land use allocation decisions of these private owners are critical for the supply of the forest biomass feedstock to support bioenergy production. We apply a computable general equilibrium model to assess the economy-wide impacts of forestland owners' willingness to plant pine on non-forested land for woody bioenergy in Virginia. We consider three counterfactual scenarios of biomass feedstock supply increase as intermediate demand for bioenergy production based on forestland owners' willingness to accept biomass bid prices to set aside more non-forested land for biomass production in Virginia under general equilibrium conditions. Overall, the results show an increase in social welfare and household utility but a marginal decline in GDP. However, increased demand of biomass from logging sector depressed the manufacturing sector (the wood manufacturing sub-sector particularly), which also relies on the logging sector for its intermediate inputs. Results from this study provide insights into the bioenergy land use competition debate, and pathways towards sustainable bioenergy feedstock supply.

AB - The growing attention to renewable energy and rural development has created greater demand for production of biomass feedstock for bioenergy. However, forest growth rates and the amount of land in most existing forests may not be sufficient to sustainably supply the forest biomass required to support existing forest products industries and the expanding bioenergy industry. Additionally, concerns about agricultural land use competition have dampened expansion of biomass production on agricultural land base. One of the ways to meet the growing forest biomass feedstock demand for bioenergy production is by allocating currently marginal non-forested land for growing bioenergy feedstocks. In Virginia, about 80% of forestland is under nonindustrial private forest ownership. The land use allocation decisions of these private owners are critical for the supply of the forest biomass feedstock to support bioenergy production. We apply a computable general equilibrium model to assess the economy-wide impacts of forestland owners' willingness to plant pine on non-forested land for woody bioenergy in Virginia. We consider three counterfactual scenarios of biomass feedstock supply increase as intermediate demand for bioenergy production based on forestland owners' willingness to accept biomass bid prices to set aside more non-forested land for biomass production in Virginia under general equilibrium conditions. Overall, the results show an increase in social welfare and household utility but a marginal decline in GDP. However, increased demand of biomass from logging sector depressed the manufacturing sector (the wood manufacturing sub-sector particularly), which also relies on the logging sector for its intermediate inputs. Results from this study provide insights into the bioenergy land use competition debate, and pathways towards sustainable bioenergy feedstock supply.

KW - Bioenergy

KW - CGE model

KW - Forest biomass

KW - Land use change

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061575654&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3390/f10020159

DO - 10.3390/f10020159

M3 - Article

VL - 10

JO - Forests

JF - Forests

SN - 1999-4907

IS - 2

M1 - 159

ER -