Potential economic impacts of allocating more land for bioenergy biomass production in Virginia

Keyphrases

• Agricultural Land 16%
• Agricultural Land Use 16%
• Allocation Decisions 16%
• Bid Price 16%
• Bioenergy 100%
• Bioenergy Industry 16%
• Bioenergy Production 50%
• Biomass Feedstock 100%
• Biomass Production 100%
• Computable General Equilibrium Model 16%
• Counterfactual Scenarios 16%
• Economic Impact 100%
• Economy-wide Impact 16%
• Equilibrium Condition 16%
• Feedstock Supply 33%
• Forest Biomass 50%
• Forest Growth 16%
• Forest Industry 16%
• Forest Land 16%
• Forest Owners 33%
• General Equilibrium 16%
• Growth Rate 16%
• Household Utility 16%
• Increased Demand 16%
• Intermediate Demand 16%
• Intermediate Inputs 16%
• Land Use Allocation 16%
• Land Use Competition 33%
• Land-based 16%
• Manufacturing Sector 16%
• Manufacturing Subsectors 16%
• Non-industrial Private Forest 16%
• Private Forest Ownership 16%
• Private Owner 16%
• Production Base 16%
• Renewable Energy Investment 16%
• Rural Development 16%
• Set-aside 16%
• Social Welfare 16%
• Sustainable Bioenergy 16%
• Virginia 100%
• Willingness to Accept 16%
• Wood Manufacturing 16%
• Woody Bioenergy 16%

Agricultural and Biological Sciences

• Arable Land 20%
• Bioenergy 100%
• Biomass Production 100%
• Feedstock 60%
• Forest Growth 10%
• Forest Product 10%
• Land Use 30%
• Nonindustrial Private Forests 10%
• Pinus 10%

Engineering

• Bioenergy 100%
• Equilibrium Condition 10%
• Equilibrium Model 10%
• Land Use 30%
• Manufacturing Sector 10%
• Marginals 20%
• Renewable Energy 10%