Abstract
In visual search, observers make decisions about the presence or absence of a target based on their perception of a target during search. The present study investigated whether decisions can be based on observers' expectation rather than perception of a target. In Experiment 1, participants were allowed to make target-present responses by clicking on the target or, if the target was not perceived, a target-present button. Participants used the target-present button option more frequently in difficult search trials and when target prevalence was high. Experiment 2 and 3 employed a difficult search task that encouraged the use of prevalence-based decisions. Target presence was reported faster when target prevalence was high, indicating that decisions were, in part, cognitive, and not strictly perceptual. A similar pattern of responses were made even when no targets appeared in the search (Experiment 3). The implication of these prevalence-based decisions for visual search models is discussed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 541-568 |
Number of pages | 28 |
Journal | Visual Cognition |
Volume | 21 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2013 |
Keywords
- Decision theory
- Low prevalence effect
- Perception
- Prevalence
- Signal detection
- Visual search