Prior art: To search or not to search

Vidya Atal, Talia Bar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

To determine patentability, inventions are evaluated in light of existing prior art. Innovators have a duty to disclose any prior art that they are aware of, but have no obligation to search. We study innovators' incentives to search for prior art, their search intensities and the timing of search. We distinguish between early state of the art search-conducted before R&D investment, and novelty search-conducted right before applying for a patent. We identify conditions in which innovators have no incentive to search for prior art. Search intensity increases with R&D cost, the examiners' expected search effort, and with patenting fees. We also find that innovators prefer to correlate their search technology with that of the patent office. In light of our model, we discuss the implications of some proposed policy reforms.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-521
Number of pages15
JournalInternational Journal of Industrial Organization
Volume28
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2010

Fingerprint

Patents and inventions
Costs
Art
Innovators

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • Patent
  • Prior art
  • Research and development
  • Search

Cite this

@article{1bb1dcaf6b884118b30d061baf40ced6,
title = "Prior art: To search or not to search",
abstract = "To determine patentability, inventions are evaluated in light of existing prior art. Innovators have a duty to disclose any prior art that they are aware of, but have no obligation to search. We study innovators' incentives to search for prior art, their search intensities and the timing of search. We distinguish between early state of the art search-conducted before R&D investment, and novelty search-conducted right before applying for a patent. We identify conditions in which innovators have no incentive to search for prior art. Search intensity increases with R&D cost, the examiners' expected search effort, and with patenting fees. We also find that innovators prefer to correlate their search technology with that of the patent office. In light of our model, we discuss the implications of some proposed policy reforms.",
keywords = "Innovation, Patent, Prior art, Research and development, Search",
author = "Vidya Atal and Talia Bar",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "507--521",
journal = "International Journal of Industrial Organization",
issn = "0167-7187",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Prior art : To search or not to search. / Atal, Vidya; Bar, Talia.

In: International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol. 28, No. 5, 01.09.2010, p. 507-521.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prior art

T2 - To search or not to search

AU - Atal, Vidya

AU - Bar, Talia

PY - 2010/9/1

Y1 - 2010/9/1

N2 - To determine patentability, inventions are evaluated in light of existing prior art. Innovators have a duty to disclose any prior art that they are aware of, but have no obligation to search. We study innovators' incentives to search for prior art, their search intensities and the timing of search. We distinguish between early state of the art search-conducted before R&D investment, and novelty search-conducted right before applying for a patent. We identify conditions in which innovators have no incentive to search for prior art. Search intensity increases with R&D cost, the examiners' expected search effort, and with patenting fees. We also find that innovators prefer to correlate their search technology with that of the patent office. In light of our model, we discuss the implications of some proposed policy reforms.

AB - To determine patentability, inventions are evaluated in light of existing prior art. Innovators have a duty to disclose any prior art that they are aware of, but have no obligation to search. We study innovators' incentives to search for prior art, their search intensities and the timing of search. We distinguish between early state of the art search-conducted before R&D investment, and novelty search-conducted right before applying for a patent. We identify conditions in which innovators have no incentive to search for prior art. Search intensity increases with R&D cost, the examiners' expected search effort, and with patenting fees. We also find that innovators prefer to correlate their search technology with that of the patent office. In light of our model, we discuss the implications of some proposed policy reforms.

KW - Innovation

KW - Patent

KW - Prior art

KW - Research and development

KW - Search

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78049258893&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.12.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:78049258893

VL - 28

SP - 507

EP - 521

JO - International Journal of Industrial Organization

JF - International Journal of Industrial Organization

SN - 0167-7187

IS - 5

ER -