Privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship

Harriet Glosoff, Barbara Herlihy, Scott B. Herlihy, E. Berton Spence

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Determining the status of privileged communications between psychologists and clients is a complex task. There is considerable variation across states with respect to the scope of psychologist-client privilege, and several sections of state codes directly and indirectly influence its status. An analysis of state laws related to privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship is presented and prevalent legal exceptions and trends related to client privilege are discussed. Implications for practice to assist psychologists in balancing their ethical and legal obligations also are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)573-580
Number of pages8
JournalProfessional Psychology: Research and Practice
Volume28
Issue number6
StatePublished - 1 Dec 1997

Fingerprint

Confidentiality
Psychology
Jurisprudence

Cite this

Glosoff, Harriet ; Herlihy, Barbara ; Herlihy, Scott B. ; Spence, E. Berton. / Privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship. In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 1997 ; Vol. 28, No. 6. pp. 573-580.
@article{48e035759beb45b6a41378f031d11807,
title = "Privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship",
abstract = "Determining the status of privileged communications between psychologists and clients is a complex task. There is considerable variation across states with respect to the scope of psychologist-client privilege, and several sections of state codes directly and indirectly influence its status. An analysis of state laws related to privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship is presented and prevalent legal exceptions and trends related to client privilege are discussed. Implications for practice to assist psychologists in balancing their ethical and legal obligations also are discussed.",
author = "Harriet Glosoff and Barbara Herlihy and Herlihy, {Scott B.} and Spence, {E. Berton}",
year = "1997",
month = "12",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "573--580",
journal = "Professional Psychology: Research and Practice",
issn = "0735-7028",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship. / Glosoff, Harriet; Herlihy, Barbara; Herlihy, Scott B.; Spence, E. Berton.

In: Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, Vol. 28, No. 6, 01.12.1997, p. 573-580.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship

AU - Glosoff, Harriet

AU - Herlihy, Barbara

AU - Herlihy, Scott B.

AU - Spence, E. Berton

PY - 1997/12/1

Y1 - 1997/12/1

N2 - Determining the status of privileged communications between psychologists and clients is a complex task. There is considerable variation across states with respect to the scope of psychologist-client privilege, and several sections of state codes directly and indirectly influence its status. An analysis of state laws related to privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship is presented and prevalent legal exceptions and trends related to client privilege are discussed. Implications for practice to assist psychologists in balancing their ethical and legal obligations also are discussed.

AB - Determining the status of privileged communications between psychologists and clients is a complex task. There is considerable variation across states with respect to the scope of psychologist-client privilege, and several sections of state codes directly and indirectly influence its status. An analysis of state laws related to privileged communication in the psychologist-client relationship is presented and prevalent legal exceptions and trends related to client privilege are discussed. Implications for practice to assist psychologists in balancing their ethical and legal obligations also are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031505171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

VL - 28

SP - 573

EP - 580

JO - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

JF - Professional Psychology: Research and Practice

SN - 0735-7028

IS - 6

ER -