Protection for the good

Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast

Debra Zellner, Brett B. Kern, Scott Parker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Stimuli are rated less "good" when compared to very good context stimuli than when presented alone or compared to less good context stimuli. This diminution in rating is hedonic contrast. In two studies, degree of hedonic contrast depended on subjects' categorization of stimuli. Subjects were surveyed about their liking of gourmet and ordinary coffees (Study 1) and specialty and regular beers (Study 2). In Study 1, contrast was substantially smaller for subjects who regarded the coffees as belonging to different categories than for subjects having a common category for both sorts of coffees. The analogous phenomenon was found in Study 2, comparing subjects who subcategorized beers to subjects who had a common category for both sorts of beers. Contrast is greatest for stimuli in a common category.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)175-180
Number of pages6
JournalAppetite
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2002

Fingerprint

Pleasure
Coffee

Cite this

Zellner, Debra ; Kern, Brett B. ; Parker, Scott. / Protection for the good : Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast. In: Appetite. 2002 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 175-180.
@article{bb833eeca7c14d8f8ec866f3352db957,
title = "Protection for the good: Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast",
abstract = "Stimuli are rated less {"}good{"} when compared to very good context stimuli than when presented alone or compared to less good context stimuli. This diminution in rating is hedonic contrast. In two studies, degree of hedonic contrast depended on subjects' categorization of stimuli. Subjects were surveyed about their liking of gourmet and ordinary coffees (Study 1) and specialty and regular beers (Study 2). In Study 1, contrast was substantially smaller for subjects who regarded the coffees as belonging to different categories than for subjects having a common category for both sorts of coffees. The analogous phenomenon was found in Study 2, comparing subjects who subcategorized beers to subjects who had a common category for both sorts of beers. Contrast is greatest for stimuli in a common category.",
author = "Debra Zellner and Kern, {Brett B.} and Scott Parker",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/appe.2002.0476",
language = "English",
volume = "38",
pages = "175--180",
journal = "Appetite",
issn = "0195-6663",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Protection for the good : Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast. / Zellner, Debra; Kern, Brett B.; Parker, Scott.

In: Appetite, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.01.2002, p. 175-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Protection for the good

T2 - Subcategorization reduces hedonic contrast

AU - Zellner, Debra

AU - Kern, Brett B.

AU - Parker, Scott

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - Stimuli are rated less "good" when compared to very good context stimuli than when presented alone or compared to less good context stimuli. This diminution in rating is hedonic contrast. In two studies, degree of hedonic contrast depended on subjects' categorization of stimuli. Subjects were surveyed about their liking of gourmet and ordinary coffees (Study 1) and specialty and regular beers (Study 2). In Study 1, contrast was substantially smaller for subjects who regarded the coffees as belonging to different categories than for subjects having a common category for both sorts of coffees. The analogous phenomenon was found in Study 2, comparing subjects who subcategorized beers to subjects who had a common category for both sorts of beers. Contrast is greatest for stimuli in a common category.

AB - Stimuli are rated less "good" when compared to very good context stimuli than when presented alone or compared to less good context stimuli. This diminution in rating is hedonic contrast. In two studies, degree of hedonic contrast depended on subjects' categorization of stimuli. Subjects were surveyed about their liking of gourmet and ordinary coffees (Study 1) and specialty and regular beers (Study 2). In Study 1, contrast was substantially smaller for subjects who regarded the coffees as belonging to different categories than for subjects having a common category for both sorts of coffees. The analogous phenomenon was found in Study 2, comparing subjects who subcategorized beers to subjects who had a common category for both sorts of beers. Contrast is greatest for stimuli in a common category.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036309032&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/appe.2002.0476

DO - 10.1006/appe.2002.0476

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 175

EP - 180

JO - Appetite

JF - Appetite

SN - 0195-6663

IS - 3

ER -