Quantifying Global Impacts to Society from the Consumption of Natural Resources during Environmental Remediation Activities

Melissa A. Harclerode, Pankaj Lal, Michael E. Miller

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Environmental remediation activities often require the management of large volumes of water and the consumption of significant amounts of local natural resources, including energy and fossil fuels. Traditionally, proposed remedial approaches for a specific cleanup scenario are evaluated by overall project implementation cost, time frame of the cleanup, and effectiveness to meet cleanup goals. A new paradigm shift, referred to as sustainable remediation, has influenced the remediation industry to consider environmental, social, and economic impacts from cleanup activities. An environmental footprint analysis is the most common method to evaluate environmental implications of cleanup approaches. Presently, these footprint tools do not associate the environmental implications with global impacts. In this article, the method has been extended to integrate the social cost of carbon emissions to quantify global impacts. The case study site is a former aircraft parts manufacturing facility that caused chlorinated solvent contamination in soil and groundwater beneath the building. A groundwater pump-and-treat system was initially installed, followed by its gradual phase-out with concurrent phase in of in situ bioremediation. The case study evaluates the monetized societal benefits from quantifying carbon emission impacts of the proposed cleanup approaches and alternative scenarios. Our results suggest that societal impacts based on monetized carbon emissions can be reduced by 27% by optimizing the remediation processes. The sensitivity analysis results elucidate how variation in carbon prices and social discount rates can influence cleanup decisions for remediation projects.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)410-422
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Industrial Ecology
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2016

Fingerprint

cleanup
natural resources
remediation
natural resource
carbon emission
scenario
social costs
footprint
economic impact
environmental pollution
social effects
aircraft
environmental impact
manufacturing
pump and treat
paradigm
paradigm shift
discount rate
groundwater
energy

Keywords

  • environmental footprint analysis
  • industrial ecology
  • social cost benefit analysis
  • social cost of carbon
  • socioeconomic impacts
  • sustainable remediation

Cite this

@article{5ebbcd82d4b142199a8ed1af22a11f60,
title = "Quantifying Global Impacts to Society from the Consumption of Natural Resources during Environmental Remediation Activities",
abstract = "Environmental remediation activities often require the management of large volumes of water and the consumption of significant amounts of local natural resources, including energy and fossil fuels. Traditionally, proposed remedial approaches for a specific cleanup scenario are evaluated by overall project implementation cost, time frame of the cleanup, and effectiveness to meet cleanup goals. A new paradigm shift, referred to as sustainable remediation, has influenced the remediation industry to consider environmental, social, and economic impacts from cleanup activities. An environmental footprint analysis is the most common method to evaluate environmental implications of cleanup approaches. Presently, these footprint tools do not associate the environmental implications with global impacts. In this article, the method has been extended to integrate the social cost of carbon emissions to quantify global impacts. The case study site is a former aircraft parts manufacturing facility that caused chlorinated solvent contamination in soil and groundwater beneath the building. A groundwater pump-and-treat system was initially installed, followed by its gradual phase-out with concurrent phase in of in situ bioremediation. The case study evaluates the monetized societal benefits from quantifying carbon emission impacts of the proposed cleanup approaches and alternative scenarios. Our results suggest that societal impacts based on monetized carbon emissions can be reduced by 27{\%} by optimizing the remediation processes. The sensitivity analysis results elucidate how variation in carbon prices and social discount rates can influence cleanup decisions for remediation projects.",
keywords = "environmental footprint analysis, industrial ecology, social cost benefit analysis, social cost of carbon, socioeconomic impacts, sustainable remediation",
author = "Harclerode, {Melissa A.} and Pankaj Lal and Miller, {Michael E.}",
year = "2016",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jiec.12380",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "410--422",
journal = "Journal of Industrial Ecology",
issn = "1088-1980",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "3",

}

Quantifying Global Impacts to Society from the Consumption of Natural Resources during Environmental Remediation Activities. / Harclerode, Melissa A.; Lal, Pankaj; Miller, Michael E.

In: Journal of Industrial Ecology, Vol. 20, No. 3, 01.06.2016, p. 410-422.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantifying Global Impacts to Society from the Consumption of Natural Resources during Environmental Remediation Activities

AU - Harclerode, Melissa A.

AU - Lal, Pankaj

AU - Miller, Michael E.

PY - 2016/6/1

Y1 - 2016/6/1

N2 - Environmental remediation activities often require the management of large volumes of water and the consumption of significant amounts of local natural resources, including energy and fossil fuels. Traditionally, proposed remedial approaches for a specific cleanup scenario are evaluated by overall project implementation cost, time frame of the cleanup, and effectiveness to meet cleanup goals. A new paradigm shift, referred to as sustainable remediation, has influenced the remediation industry to consider environmental, social, and economic impacts from cleanup activities. An environmental footprint analysis is the most common method to evaluate environmental implications of cleanup approaches. Presently, these footprint tools do not associate the environmental implications with global impacts. In this article, the method has been extended to integrate the social cost of carbon emissions to quantify global impacts. The case study site is a former aircraft parts manufacturing facility that caused chlorinated solvent contamination in soil and groundwater beneath the building. A groundwater pump-and-treat system was initially installed, followed by its gradual phase-out with concurrent phase in of in situ bioremediation. The case study evaluates the monetized societal benefits from quantifying carbon emission impacts of the proposed cleanup approaches and alternative scenarios. Our results suggest that societal impacts based on monetized carbon emissions can be reduced by 27% by optimizing the remediation processes. The sensitivity analysis results elucidate how variation in carbon prices and social discount rates can influence cleanup decisions for remediation projects.

AB - Environmental remediation activities often require the management of large volumes of water and the consumption of significant amounts of local natural resources, including energy and fossil fuels. Traditionally, proposed remedial approaches for a specific cleanup scenario are evaluated by overall project implementation cost, time frame of the cleanup, and effectiveness to meet cleanup goals. A new paradigm shift, referred to as sustainable remediation, has influenced the remediation industry to consider environmental, social, and economic impacts from cleanup activities. An environmental footprint analysis is the most common method to evaluate environmental implications of cleanup approaches. Presently, these footprint tools do not associate the environmental implications with global impacts. In this article, the method has been extended to integrate the social cost of carbon emissions to quantify global impacts. The case study site is a former aircraft parts manufacturing facility that caused chlorinated solvent contamination in soil and groundwater beneath the building. A groundwater pump-and-treat system was initially installed, followed by its gradual phase-out with concurrent phase in of in situ bioremediation. The case study evaluates the monetized societal benefits from quantifying carbon emission impacts of the proposed cleanup approaches and alternative scenarios. Our results suggest that societal impacts based on monetized carbon emissions can be reduced by 27% by optimizing the remediation processes. The sensitivity analysis results elucidate how variation in carbon prices and social discount rates can influence cleanup decisions for remediation projects.

KW - environmental footprint analysis

KW - industrial ecology

KW - social cost benefit analysis

KW - social cost of carbon

KW - socioeconomic impacts

KW - sustainable remediation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84951304658&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jiec.12380

DO - 10.1111/jiec.12380

M3 - Article

VL - 20

SP - 410

EP - 422

JO - Journal of Industrial Ecology

JF - Journal of Industrial Ecology

SN - 1088-1980

IS - 3

ER -