Abstract
Researchers have argued high school students, college students, pre-service teachers, and in-service teachers do not construct productive inverse function meanings. In this report, I first summarize the literature examining students’ and teachers’ inverse function meanings. I then provide my theoretical perspective, including my use of the terms understanding and meaning and my operationalization of productive inverse function meanings. I describe a conceptual analysis of ways students may reorganize their limited inverse function meanings into productive meanings via reasoning about relationships between covarying quantities. I then present one pre-service teacher's activity in a semester long teaching experiment to characterize how her quantitative, covariational, and bidirectional reasoning supported her in reorganizing her limited inverse function meanings into more productive meanings. I describe how this reorganization required her to reconstruct her meanings for various related mathematical ideas. I conclude with research and pedagogical implications stemming from this work and directions for future research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 100741 |
| Journal | Journal of Mathematical Behavior |
| Volume | 57 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Mar 2020 |
Keywords
- Cognition
- Covariational reasoning
- Inverse function
- Quantitative reasoning
- Relations
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reasoning about relationships between quantities to reorganize inverse function meanings: The case of Arya'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver