Regional differences in industry specialization in the sustainability assurance market

Belen Fernandez-Feijoo, Silvia Romero, Silvia Ruiz Blanco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: This paper uses institutional theory to analyze the structure of the sustainability assurance market (SAM) at a global level. The purpose of this paper is to determine if regional differences affect industry specialization in this market. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of 3,657 sustainability reports (SRs) with assurance statements, the authors study the global and regional specialization of assurers by breaking down the sample into three main regions. The authors approach industry specialization using previous methodologies applied to the financial audit market, and explain differences statistically significant among regions. Findings: The authors find different industry specialists depending on the geographical region in which the audit firm is located. The Europe, Middle Eastern and Africa region has the highest number of industry specialists and the Asia-Pacific region the lowest. Notwithstanding the global participation of Big 4 firms, assurance specialization depends on the country where the company is located. Research limitations/implications: The paper reveals the need to include regional differences in the analysis of the SAM at the international level. Practical implications: The study shows an in-depth study of the SAM that may be useful for assurers, to decide strategic actions in industries and countries and for regulators, to control the risk of monopolistic/oligopolistic markets. Originality/value: The study presents a novel approach to the analysis of the assurance market for SRs, by studying it from the supply point of view. The analysis provides a measure of specialization that may help understand the structure of the SAM.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)669-687
Number of pages19
JournalManagement Decision
Volume57
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 11 Mar 2019

Fingerprint

Assurance
Industry specialization
Sustainability
Regional differences
Industry
Sustainability reports
Participation
Audit market
Regional specialization
Strategic action
Methodology
Design methodology
Africa
Big 4
Asia-Pacific region
Audit firms
Institutional theory

Keywords

  • Big 4
  • Business strategy
  • Industry specialization
  • Social responsibility
  • Specialization measure
  • Sustainability assurance

Cite this

Fernandez-Feijoo, Belen ; Romero, Silvia ; Ruiz Blanco, Silvia. / Regional differences in industry specialization in the sustainability assurance market. In: Management Decision. 2019 ; Vol. 57, No. 3. pp. 669-687.
@article{c5f371c4a981455997c03f02e2a87cc5,
title = "Regional differences in industry specialization in the sustainability assurance market",
abstract = "Purpose: This paper uses institutional theory to analyze the structure of the sustainability assurance market (SAM) at a global level. The purpose of this paper is to determine if regional differences affect industry specialization in this market. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of 3,657 sustainability reports (SRs) with assurance statements, the authors study the global and regional specialization of assurers by breaking down the sample into three main regions. The authors approach industry specialization using previous methodologies applied to the financial audit market, and explain differences statistically significant among regions. Findings: The authors find different industry specialists depending on the geographical region in which the audit firm is located. The Europe, Middle Eastern and Africa region has the highest number of industry specialists and the Asia-Pacific region the lowest. Notwithstanding the global participation of Big 4 firms, assurance specialization depends on the country where the company is located. Research limitations/implications: The paper reveals the need to include regional differences in the analysis of the SAM at the international level. Practical implications: The study shows an in-depth study of the SAM that may be useful for assurers, to decide strategic actions in industries and countries and for regulators, to control the risk of monopolistic/oligopolistic markets. Originality/value: The study presents a novel approach to the analysis of the assurance market for SRs, by studying it from the supply point of view. The analysis provides a measure of specialization that may help understand the structure of the SAM.",
keywords = "Big 4, Business strategy, Industry specialization, Social responsibility, Specialization measure, Sustainability assurance",
author = "Belen Fernandez-Feijoo and Silvia Romero and {Ruiz Blanco}, Silvia",
year = "2019",
month = "3",
day = "11",
doi = "10.1108/MD-06-2017-0598",
language = "English",
volume = "57",
pages = "669--687",
journal = "Management Decision",
issn = "0025-1747",
publisher = "Emerald Group Publishing Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Regional differences in industry specialization in the sustainability assurance market. / Fernandez-Feijoo, Belen; Romero, Silvia; Ruiz Blanco, Silvia.

In: Management Decision, Vol. 57, No. 3, 11.03.2019, p. 669-687.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regional differences in industry specialization in the sustainability assurance market

AU - Fernandez-Feijoo, Belen

AU - Romero, Silvia

AU - Ruiz Blanco, Silvia

PY - 2019/3/11

Y1 - 2019/3/11

N2 - Purpose: This paper uses institutional theory to analyze the structure of the sustainability assurance market (SAM) at a global level. The purpose of this paper is to determine if regional differences affect industry specialization in this market. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of 3,657 sustainability reports (SRs) with assurance statements, the authors study the global and regional specialization of assurers by breaking down the sample into three main regions. The authors approach industry specialization using previous methodologies applied to the financial audit market, and explain differences statistically significant among regions. Findings: The authors find different industry specialists depending on the geographical region in which the audit firm is located. The Europe, Middle Eastern and Africa region has the highest number of industry specialists and the Asia-Pacific region the lowest. Notwithstanding the global participation of Big 4 firms, assurance specialization depends on the country where the company is located. Research limitations/implications: The paper reveals the need to include regional differences in the analysis of the SAM at the international level. Practical implications: The study shows an in-depth study of the SAM that may be useful for assurers, to decide strategic actions in industries and countries and for regulators, to control the risk of monopolistic/oligopolistic markets. Originality/value: The study presents a novel approach to the analysis of the assurance market for SRs, by studying it from the supply point of view. The analysis provides a measure of specialization that may help understand the structure of the SAM.

AB - Purpose: This paper uses institutional theory to analyze the structure of the sustainability assurance market (SAM) at a global level. The purpose of this paper is to determine if regional differences affect industry specialization in this market. Design/methodology/approach: Using a sample of 3,657 sustainability reports (SRs) with assurance statements, the authors study the global and regional specialization of assurers by breaking down the sample into three main regions. The authors approach industry specialization using previous methodologies applied to the financial audit market, and explain differences statistically significant among regions. Findings: The authors find different industry specialists depending on the geographical region in which the audit firm is located. The Europe, Middle Eastern and Africa region has the highest number of industry specialists and the Asia-Pacific region the lowest. Notwithstanding the global participation of Big 4 firms, assurance specialization depends on the country where the company is located. Research limitations/implications: The paper reveals the need to include regional differences in the analysis of the SAM at the international level. Practical implications: The study shows an in-depth study of the SAM that may be useful for assurers, to decide strategic actions in industries and countries and for regulators, to control the risk of monopolistic/oligopolistic markets. Originality/value: The study presents a novel approach to the analysis of the assurance market for SRs, by studying it from the supply point of view. The analysis provides a measure of specialization that may help understand the structure of the SAM.

KW - Big 4

KW - Business strategy

KW - Industry specialization

KW - Social responsibility

KW - Specialization measure

KW - Sustainability assurance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85052384274&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1108/MD-06-2017-0598

DO - 10.1108/MD-06-2017-0598

M3 - Article

VL - 57

SP - 669

EP - 687

JO - Management Decision

JF - Management Decision

SN - 0025-1747

IS - 3

ER -