Relations between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: This study attempted to understand the relationship between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter. Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design using a web survey distribution mode to gain information related to causal attributions and psychological well-being of 348 adults who stutter. Correlation analyses were conducted to determine relationships between participants' causal attributions (i.e. locus of causality, external control, personal control, stability, biological attributions, non-biological attributions) for stuttering and various measures of psychological well-being including self-stigma, self-esteem/self-efficacy, hope, anxiety and depression. Result: Results indicated that higher perceptions of external control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy and higher ratings of anxiety and depression. Higher perceptions of personal control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of self-stigma and higher ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy. Increased biological attributions were significantly related to higher ratings of permanency and unchangeableness of stuttering and lower ratings of personal control of stuttering. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the importance of instilling a sense of control in PWS regarding their ability to manage their stuttering. Findings also raise questions regarding the benefits of educating PWS about the biological underpinnings of stuttering.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-10
Number of pages10
JournalInternational Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

Stuttering
Psychology
Hope
Self Efficacy
Self Concept
Anxiety
Depression
Aptitude
Psychological Well-being
Attribution
Stutter
Causal
Causality
Rating

Keywords

  • Stuttering
  • dysfluency
  • psychosocial

Cite this

@article{9f817d2f00b04d64bea3879ae9efe3ec,
title = "Relations between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter",
abstract = "Purpose: This study attempted to understand the relationship between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter. Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design using a web survey distribution mode to gain information related to causal attributions and psychological well-being of 348 adults who stutter. Correlation analyses were conducted to determine relationships between participants' causal attributions (i.e. locus of causality, external control, personal control, stability, biological attributions, non-biological attributions) for stuttering and various measures of psychological well-being including self-stigma, self-esteem/self-efficacy, hope, anxiety and depression. Result: Results indicated that higher perceptions of external control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy and higher ratings of anxiety and depression. Higher perceptions of personal control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of self-stigma and higher ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy. Increased biological attributions were significantly related to higher ratings of permanency and unchangeableness of stuttering and lower ratings of personal control of stuttering. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the importance of instilling a sense of control in PWS regarding their ability to manage their stuttering. Findings also raise questions regarding the benefits of educating PWS about the biological underpinnings of stuttering.",
keywords = "Stuttering, dysfluency, psychosocial",
author = "Michael Boyle",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.3109/17549507.2015.1060529",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "1--10",
journal = "International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology",
issn = "1754-9515",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "1",

}

Relations between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter. / Boyle, Michael.

In: International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, Vol. 18, No. 1, 02.01.2016, p. 1-10.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relations between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter

AU - Boyle, Michael

PY - 2016/1/2

Y1 - 2016/1/2

N2 - Purpose: This study attempted to understand the relationship between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter. Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design using a web survey distribution mode to gain information related to causal attributions and psychological well-being of 348 adults who stutter. Correlation analyses were conducted to determine relationships between participants' causal attributions (i.e. locus of causality, external control, personal control, stability, biological attributions, non-biological attributions) for stuttering and various measures of psychological well-being including self-stigma, self-esteem/self-efficacy, hope, anxiety and depression. Result: Results indicated that higher perceptions of external control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy and higher ratings of anxiety and depression. Higher perceptions of personal control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of self-stigma and higher ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy. Increased biological attributions were significantly related to higher ratings of permanency and unchangeableness of stuttering and lower ratings of personal control of stuttering. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the importance of instilling a sense of control in PWS regarding their ability to manage their stuttering. Findings also raise questions regarding the benefits of educating PWS about the biological underpinnings of stuttering.

AB - Purpose: This study attempted to understand the relationship between causal attributions for stuttering and psychological well-being in adults who stutter. Method: The study employed a cross-sectional design using a web survey distribution mode to gain information related to causal attributions and psychological well-being of 348 adults who stutter. Correlation analyses were conducted to determine relationships between participants' causal attributions (i.e. locus of causality, external control, personal control, stability, biological attributions, non-biological attributions) for stuttering and various measures of psychological well-being including self-stigma, self-esteem/self-efficacy, hope, anxiety and depression. Result: Results indicated that higher perceptions of external control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy and higher ratings of anxiety and depression. Higher perceptions of personal control of stuttering were related to significantly lower ratings of self-stigma and higher ratings of hope and self-esteem/self-efficacy. Increased biological attributions were significantly related to higher ratings of permanency and unchangeableness of stuttering and lower ratings of personal control of stuttering. Conclusion: The findings demonstrate the importance of instilling a sense of control in PWS regarding their ability to manage their stuttering. Findings also raise questions regarding the benefits of educating PWS about the biological underpinnings of stuttering.

KW - Stuttering

KW - dysfluency

KW - psychosocial

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84954208129&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/17549507.2015.1060529

DO - 10.3109/17549507.2015.1060529

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 1

EP - 10

JO - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

JF - International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology

SN - 1754-9515

IS - 1

ER -