Relative importance of industry and country factors in security returns

Anthony Tessitore, Nilufer Usmen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper addresses the question whether security returns are determined primarily by country factors or industry factors using a sample of closed-end funds. In the past, some studies have concluded that country effects are more significant whereas others have reported evidence that industry effects have gained in importance. Using very recent data and a novel methodology to measure relative importance of these effects, the present paper shows that country effects are still more significant than industry effects and that there is no clear trend showing industry effects have gained in importance. The methodology presented is robust enough to examine this trend in the coming years. For the time being, this paper suggests that top-down fund managers should continue to focus on country selection in their portfolio construction.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-25
Number of pages10
JournalGlobal Finance Journal
Volume16
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Aug 2005

Fingerprint

Factors
Industry
Relative importance
Security returns
Industry effects
Country effects
Methodology
Closed-end funds
Top-down
Fund managers
Portfolio construction

Keywords

  • Closed-end funds
  • Industry and country factors
  • Style analysis

Cite this

Tessitore, Anthony ; Usmen, Nilufer. / Relative importance of industry and country factors in security returns. In: Global Finance Journal. 2005 ; Vol. 16, No. 1. pp. 16-25.
@article{b6c4512c23884a78a80b8345a518f61e,
title = "Relative importance of industry and country factors in security returns",
abstract = "This paper addresses the question whether security returns are determined primarily by country factors or industry factors using a sample of closed-end funds. In the past, some studies have concluded that country effects are more significant whereas others have reported evidence that industry effects have gained in importance. Using very recent data and a novel methodology to measure relative importance of these effects, the present paper shows that country effects are still more significant than industry effects and that there is no clear trend showing industry effects have gained in importance. The methodology presented is robust enough to examine this trend in the coming years. For the time being, this paper suggests that top-down fund managers should continue to focus on country selection in their portfolio construction.",
keywords = "Closed-end funds, Industry and country factors, Style analysis",
author = "Anthony Tessitore and Nilufer Usmen",
year = "2005",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.gfj.2005.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
pages = "16--25",
journal = "Global Finance Journal",
issn = "1044-0283",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Relative importance of industry and country factors in security returns. / Tessitore, Anthony; Usmen, Nilufer.

In: Global Finance Journal, Vol. 16, No. 1, 01.08.2005, p. 16-25.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Relative importance of industry and country factors in security returns

AU - Tessitore, Anthony

AU - Usmen, Nilufer

PY - 2005/8/1

Y1 - 2005/8/1

N2 - This paper addresses the question whether security returns are determined primarily by country factors or industry factors using a sample of closed-end funds. In the past, some studies have concluded that country effects are more significant whereas others have reported evidence that industry effects have gained in importance. Using very recent data and a novel methodology to measure relative importance of these effects, the present paper shows that country effects are still more significant than industry effects and that there is no clear trend showing industry effects have gained in importance. The methodology presented is robust enough to examine this trend in the coming years. For the time being, this paper suggests that top-down fund managers should continue to focus on country selection in their portfolio construction.

AB - This paper addresses the question whether security returns are determined primarily by country factors or industry factors using a sample of closed-end funds. In the past, some studies have concluded that country effects are more significant whereas others have reported evidence that industry effects have gained in importance. Using very recent data and a novel methodology to measure relative importance of these effects, the present paper shows that country effects are still more significant than industry effects and that there is no clear trend showing industry effects have gained in importance. The methodology presented is robust enough to examine this trend in the coming years. For the time being, this paper suggests that top-down fund managers should continue to focus on country selection in their portfolio construction.

KW - Closed-end funds

KW - Industry and country factors

KW - Style analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=23844452104&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.gfj.2005.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.gfj.2005.05.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:23844452104

VL - 16

SP - 16

EP - 25

JO - Global Finance Journal

JF - Global Finance Journal

SN - 1044-0283

IS - 1

ER -