Re(searching) the Truth About Our Criminal Justice System: Some Challenges

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article considers the current face-off between “facts vs. alternative facts” as it relates to research on lethal encounters between police and minority citizens. I begin by reviewing major measurement challenges for those studying lethal police shootings and potential improvements for how we document police shootings. I also consider the increasing reliance on use of body cams and surveillance videos for what they may (or may not) bring to improving documentation of police/citizen encounters. Next I address a larger issue that provides the context for the “facts vs. alternative facts” dilemma: science's loss of standing as the recognized superior way of knowing about the world. Growing distrust in science, special interest research, paradigm shifts, and science illiteracy are all considered as reasons for the slippage of science as a credible knowledge source. Additionally, key traits of science (i.e., its inherent skepticism and tentative stance) may actually support the all-too-popular view that science no longer has an edge in producing valid and reliable information. I make a case for the need to reform what some see as a broken culture of science and for social researchers to commit to a serious agenda of replication of studies and findings.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1127-1139
Number of pages13
JournalSociological Forum
Volume32
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

justice
science
police
citizen
illiteracy
research interest
documentation
surveillance
video
minority
paradigm
reform
knowledge

Keywords

  • FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR)
  • crowd-sourced data collection
  • culture of science
  • failure to replicate
  • vested interest research
  • video surveillance

Cite this

@article{540faf6229534f7fbce2d9a221732333,
title = "Re(searching) the Truth About Our Criminal Justice System: Some Challenges",
abstract = "This article considers the current face-off between “facts vs. alternative facts” as it relates to research on lethal encounters between police and minority citizens. I begin by reviewing major measurement challenges for those studying lethal police shootings and potential improvements for how we document police shootings. I also consider the increasing reliance on use of body cams and surveillance videos for what they may (or may not) bring to improving documentation of police/citizen encounters. Next I address a larger issue that provides the context for the “facts vs. alternative facts” dilemma: science's loss of standing as the recognized superior way of knowing about the world. Growing distrust in science, special interest research, paradigm shifts, and science illiteracy are all considered as reasons for the slippage of science as a credible knowledge source. Additionally, key traits of science (i.e., its inherent skepticism and tentative stance) may actually support the all-too-popular view that science no longer has an edge in producing valid and reliable information. I make a case for the need to reform what some see as a broken culture of science and for social researchers to commit to a serious agenda of replication of studies and findings.",
keywords = "FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR), crowd-sourced data collection, culture of science, failure to replicate, vested interest research, video surveillance",
author = "Janet Ruane",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/socf.12370",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "1127--1139",
journal = "Sociological Forum",
issn = "0884-8971",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

Re(searching) the Truth About Our Criminal Justice System : Some Challenges. / Ruane, Janet.

In: Sociological Forum, Vol. 32, 01.12.2017, p. 1127-1139.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Re(searching) the Truth About Our Criminal Justice System

T2 - Some Challenges

AU - Ruane, Janet

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - This article considers the current face-off between “facts vs. alternative facts” as it relates to research on lethal encounters between police and minority citizens. I begin by reviewing major measurement challenges for those studying lethal police shootings and potential improvements for how we document police shootings. I also consider the increasing reliance on use of body cams and surveillance videos for what they may (or may not) bring to improving documentation of police/citizen encounters. Next I address a larger issue that provides the context for the “facts vs. alternative facts” dilemma: science's loss of standing as the recognized superior way of knowing about the world. Growing distrust in science, special interest research, paradigm shifts, and science illiteracy are all considered as reasons for the slippage of science as a credible knowledge source. Additionally, key traits of science (i.e., its inherent skepticism and tentative stance) may actually support the all-too-popular view that science no longer has an edge in producing valid and reliable information. I make a case for the need to reform what some see as a broken culture of science and for social researchers to commit to a serious agenda of replication of studies and findings.

AB - This article considers the current face-off between “facts vs. alternative facts” as it relates to research on lethal encounters between police and minority citizens. I begin by reviewing major measurement challenges for those studying lethal police shootings and potential improvements for how we document police shootings. I also consider the increasing reliance on use of body cams and surveillance videos for what they may (or may not) bring to improving documentation of police/citizen encounters. Next I address a larger issue that provides the context for the “facts vs. alternative facts” dilemma: science's loss of standing as the recognized superior way of knowing about the world. Growing distrust in science, special interest research, paradigm shifts, and science illiteracy are all considered as reasons for the slippage of science as a credible knowledge source. Additionally, key traits of science (i.e., its inherent skepticism and tentative stance) may actually support the all-too-popular view that science no longer has an edge in producing valid and reliable information. I make a case for the need to reform what some see as a broken culture of science and for social researchers to commit to a serious agenda of replication of studies and findings.

KW - FBI's Supplementary Homicide Reports (SHR)

KW - crowd-sourced data collection

KW - culture of science

KW - failure to replicate

KW - vested interest research

KW - video surveillance

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037341078&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/socf.12370

DO - 10.1111/socf.12370

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85037341078

VL - 32

SP - 1127

EP - 1139

JO - Sociological Forum

JF - Sociological Forum

SN - 0884-8971

ER -