TY - JOUR
T1 - Resilient Outcomes among Youth Aging-Out of Foster Care
T2 - Findings from the National Youth in Transition Database
AU - Shpiegel, Svetlana
AU - Simmel, Cassandra
AU - Sapiro, Beth
AU - Ramirez Quiroz, Silvia
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The period of transition from foster care to independent living is frequently associated with poor outcomes. While some studies have conveyed patterns of resilience among transition-age foster youth, additional research is needed to examine its stability over time. The present study used data from the National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD) and the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) to examine the rates and stability of positive, or “resilient” outcomes among foster youth at ages 19 and 21 (N = 4,631). We included domains such as education, employment, and risky behaviors in our assessment of resilient outcomes. About 40% of youth met the criteria for resilience at ages 19 and 21 (i.e., “sustained resilience” group), an additional 28% met the criteria for resilience at one time point only (i.e., “periodic resilience” group), and 30% did not meet the criteria for resilience at any point (i.e., “sustained non-resilience” group). Several risk, protective, and child welfare factors were associated with manifestations of resilient outcomes during the period of transition to adulthood. Implications for policy, practice, and research are discussed.
AB - The period of transition from foster care to independent living is frequently associated with poor outcomes. While some studies have conveyed patterns of resilience among transition-age foster youth, additional research is needed to examine its stability over time. The present study used data from the National Youth in Transition Database (NYTD) and the Adoption and Foster Care Analysis and Reporting System (AFCARS) to examine the rates and stability of positive, or “resilient” outcomes among foster youth at ages 19 and 21 (N = 4,631). We included domains such as education, employment, and risky behaviors in our assessment of resilient outcomes. About 40% of youth met the criteria for resilience at ages 19 and 21 (i.e., “sustained resilience” group), an additional 28% met the criteria for resilience at one time point only (i.e., “periodic resilience” group), and 30% did not meet the criteria for resilience at any point (i.e., “sustained non-resilience” group). Several risk, protective, and child welfare factors were associated with manifestations of resilient outcomes during the period of transition to adulthood. Implications for policy, practice, and research are discussed.
KW - Resilience
KW - aging-out
KW - child welfare
KW - risk and protective factors
KW - secondary data analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103882013&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15548732.2021.1899098
DO - 10.1080/15548732.2021.1899098
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85103882013
SN - 1554-8732
VL - 16
SP - 427
EP - 450
JO - Journal of Public Child Welfare
JF - Journal of Public Child Welfare
IS - 4
ER -