Response to comment on "Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification"

William J. Murphy; Jan E. Janecka; Tanja Stadler; Eduardo Eizirik; Oliver A. Ryder; John Gatesy; Robert W. Meredith; Mark S. Springer

doi:10.1126/science.1220078

Response to comment on "Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification"

William J. Murphy, Jan E. Janecka, Tanja Stadler, Eduardo Eizirik, Oliver A. Ryder, John Gatesy, Robert W. Meredith, Mark S. Springer

Biology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Bininda-Emonds and Purvis reanalyzed our mammalian phylogenetic supermatrix and claim that our results are not significantly different from their delayed-rise hypothesis. We show that our divergence times are ~11 million years later for placental inter- and intraordinal divergences - consistent with a post - Cretaceous-Paleogene (KPg) radiation of most modern mammalian orders - and find no support for the early Eocene delayed-rise hypothesis.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	34b
Journal	Science
Volume	336
Issue number	6090
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1220078
State	Published - 6 Jul 2012

Access to Document

10.1126/science.1220078

Cite this

@article{fbddcfa9cb7944cd811170cad7bd6800,

title = "Response to comment on {"}Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification{"}",

abstract = "Bininda-Emonds and Purvis reanalyzed our mammalian phylogenetic supermatrix and claim that our results are not significantly different from their delayed-rise hypothesis. We show that our divergence times are \textasciitilde{}11 million years later for placental inter- and intraordinal divergences - consistent with a post - Cretaceous-Paleogene (KPg) radiation of most modern mammalian orders - and find no support for the early Eocene delayed-rise hypothesis.",

author = "Murphy, \{William J.\} and Janecka, \{Jan E.\} and Tanja Stadler and Eduardo Eizirik and Ryder, \{Oliver A.\} and John Gatesy and Meredith, \{Robert W.\} and Springer, \{Mark S.\}",

year = "2012",

month = jul,

day = "6",

doi = "10.1126/science.1220078",

language = "English",

volume = "336",

pages = "34b",

journal = "Science",

issn = "0036-8075",

publisher = "American Association for the Advancement of Science",

number = "6090",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Response to comment on "Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification"

AU - Murphy, William J.

AU - Janecka, Jan E.

AU - Stadler, Tanja

AU - Eizirik, Eduardo

AU - Ryder, Oliver A.

AU - Gatesy, John

AU - Meredith, Robert W.

AU - Springer, Mark S.

PY - 2012/7/6

Y1 - 2012/7/6

N2 - Bininda-Emonds and Purvis reanalyzed our mammalian phylogenetic supermatrix and claim that our results are not significantly different from their delayed-rise hypothesis. We show that our divergence times are ~11 million years later for placental inter- and intraordinal divergences - consistent with a post - Cretaceous-Paleogene (KPg) radiation of most modern mammalian orders - and find no support for the early Eocene delayed-rise hypothesis.

AB - Bininda-Emonds and Purvis reanalyzed our mammalian phylogenetic supermatrix and claim that our results are not significantly different from their delayed-rise hypothesis. We show that our divergence times are ~11 million years later for placental inter- and intraordinal divergences - consistent with a post - Cretaceous-Paleogene (KPg) radiation of most modern mammalian orders - and find no support for the early Eocene delayed-rise hypothesis.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84863550128

U2 - 10.1126/science.1220078

DO - 10.1126/science.1220078

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:84863550128

SN - 0036-8075

VL - 336

SP - 34b

JO - Science

JF - Science

IS - 6090

ER -

Response to comment on "Impacts of the cretaceous terrestrial revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification"

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this