School-Based Bullying and Teen Dating Violence Prevention Laws: Overlapping or Distinct?

Michele Cascardi, Christopher King, Daniel Rector, Jill DelPozzo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The most recent legislative attempts to curb violence in schools have been school-based dating violence prevention laws. In the previous decade, there was an increase in legislation designed to prevent bullying in schools; these laws now exist in 50 states. However, most anti-bullying laws provide an expansive definition of bullying that includes any type of peer aggression, harassment, or teen dating violence (TDV). Having several different state and federal laws aimed at curtailing multiple forms of aggression may produce confusion about appropriate intervention and disciplinary responses, requiring school districts to develop parallel sets of policies, educational curricula, intervention approaches, and reporting requirements for overlapping behaviors that can be simultaneously peer aggression, bullying, harassment, and TDV. We conducted a systematic search of applicable laws and systematically coded those we identified for relevant content (i.e., definitions, covered locales, protected groups, and personnel, procedural, preventive, and disclosure elements). Anti-bullying laws were typically more detailed than dating violence laws. TDV laws were more likely to target TDV and control intimate behavior and to provide for education about healthy relationships. Both types of laws often mandated trainings; specified reportable behaviors; discussed sanctions, recommendations, and interventions; and mentioned counseling, specially trained staff persons, or designated specialists. Both anti-bullying and TDV laws also sometimes directed reporting of aggregate incident rates and impacts of prevention efforts. Neither type of law tended to specify school and community resources or prevention approaches. Results inform discussion of the merits of different approaches to school-based violence prevention laws.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3267-3297
Number of pages31
JournalJournal of Interpersonal Violence
Volume33
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Nov 2018

Fingerprint

Bullying
Aggression
Violence
Behavior Control
Disclosure
Risk Management
Intimate Partner Violence
Legislation
Curriculum
Counseling
Education

Keywords

  • bullying
  • legal interventions
  • teen dating violence
  • youth violence

Cite this

Cascardi, Michele ; King, Christopher ; Rector, Daniel ; DelPozzo, Jill. / School-Based Bullying and Teen Dating Violence Prevention Laws : Overlapping or Distinct?. In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2018 ; Vol. 33, No. 21. pp. 3267-3297.
@article{3a708fb15a8a46fbb3183c91f3f7cd77,
title = "School-Based Bullying and Teen Dating Violence Prevention Laws: Overlapping or Distinct?",
abstract = "The most recent legislative attempts to curb violence in schools have been school-based dating violence prevention laws. In the previous decade, there was an increase in legislation designed to prevent bullying in schools; these laws now exist in 50 states. However, most anti-bullying laws provide an expansive definition of bullying that includes any type of peer aggression, harassment, or teen dating violence (TDV). Having several different state and federal laws aimed at curtailing multiple forms of aggression may produce confusion about appropriate intervention and disciplinary responses, requiring school districts to develop parallel sets of policies, educational curricula, intervention approaches, and reporting requirements for overlapping behaviors that can be simultaneously peer aggression, bullying, harassment, and TDV. We conducted a systematic search of applicable laws and systematically coded those we identified for relevant content (i.e., definitions, covered locales, protected groups, and personnel, procedural, preventive, and disclosure elements). Anti-bullying laws were typically more detailed than dating violence laws. TDV laws were more likely to target TDV and control intimate behavior and to provide for education about healthy relationships. Both types of laws often mandated trainings; specified reportable behaviors; discussed sanctions, recommendations, and interventions; and mentioned counseling, specially trained staff persons, or designated specialists. Both anti-bullying and TDV laws also sometimes directed reporting of aggregate incident rates and impacts of prevention efforts. Neither type of law tended to specify school and community resources or prevention approaches. Results inform discussion of the merits of different approaches to school-based violence prevention laws.",
keywords = "bullying, legal interventions, teen dating violence, youth violence",
author = "Michele Cascardi and Christopher King and Daniel Rector and Jill DelPozzo",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0886260518798357",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "3267--3297",
journal = "Journal of Interpersonal Violence",
issn = "0886-2605",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "21",

}

School-Based Bullying and Teen Dating Violence Prevention Laws : Overlapping or Distinct? / Cascardi, Michele; King, Christopher; Rector, Daniel; DelPozzo, Jill.

In: Journal of Interpersonal Violence, Vol. 33, No. 21, 01.11.2018, p. 3267-3297.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - School-Based Bullying and Teen Dating Violence Prevention Laws

T2 - Overlapping or Distinct?

AU - Cascardi, Michele

AU - King, Christopher

AU - Rector, Daniel

AU - DelPozzo, Jill

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - The most recent legislative attempts to curb violence in schools have been school-based dating violence prevention laws. In the previous decade, there was an increase in legislation designed to prevent bullying in schools; these laws now exist in 50 states. However, most anti-bullying laws provide an expansive definition of bullying that includes any type of peer aggression, harassment, or teen dating violence (TDV). Having several different state and federal laws aimed at curtailing multiple forms of aggression may produce confusion about appropriate intervention and disciplinary responses, requiring school districts to develop parallel sets of policies, educational curricula, intervention approaches, and reporting requirements for overlapping behaviors that can be simultaneously peer aggression, bullying, harassment, and TDV. We conducted a systematic search of applicable laws and systematically coded those we identified for relevant content (i.e., definitions, covered locales, protected groups, and personnel, procedural, preventive, and disclosure elements). Anti-bullying laws were typically more detailed than dating violence laws. TDV laws were more likely to target TDV and control intimate behavior and to provide for education about healthy relationships. Both types of laws often mandated trainings; specified reportable behaviors; discussed sanctions, recommendations, and interventions; and mentioned counseling, specially trained staff persons, or designated specialists. Both anti-bullying and TDV laws also sometimes directed reporting of aggregate incident rates and impacts of prevention efforts. Neither type of law tended to specify school and community resources or prevention approaches. Results inform discussion of the merits of different approaches to school-based violence prevention laws.

AB - The most recent legislative attempts to curb violence in schools have been school-based dating violence prevention laws. In the previous decade, there was an increase in legislation designed to prevent bullying in schools; these laws now exist in 50 states. However, most anti-bullying laws provide an expansive definition of bullying that includes any type of peer aggression, harassment, or teen dating violence (TDV). Having several different state and federal laws aimed at curtailing multiple forms of aggression may produce confusion about appropriate intervention and disciplinary responses, requiring school districts to develop parallel sets of policies, educational curricula, intervention approaches, and reporting requirements for overlapping behaviors that can be simultaneously peer aggression, bullying, harassment, and TDV. We conducted a systematic search of applicable laws and systematically coded those we identified for relevant content (i.e., definitions, covered locales, protected groups, and personnel, procedural, preventive, and disclosure elements). Anti-bullying laws were typically more detailed than dating violence laws. TDV laws were more likely to target TDV and control intimate behavior and to provide for education about healthy relationships. Both types of laws often mandated trainings; specified reportable behaviors; discussed sanctions, recommendations, and interventions; and mentioned counseling, specially trained staff persons, or designated specialists. Both anti-bullying and TDV laws also sometimes directed reporting of aggregate incident rates and impacts of prevention efforts. Neither type of law tended to specify school and community resources or prevention approaches. Results inform discussion of the merits of different approaches to school-based violence prevention laws.

KW - bullying

KW - legal interventions

KW - teen dating violence

KW - youth violence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053893993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0886260518798357

DO - 10.1177/0886260518798357

M3 - Article

C2 - 30253722

AN - SCOPUS:85053893993

VL - 33

SP - 3267

EP - 3297

JO - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

JF - Journal of Interpersonal Violence

SN - 0886-2605

IS - 21

ER -