Seeing a meal is not eating it: Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods

Monica Jimenez, David Rodriguez, Nancy Greene, Debra A. Zellner, Armand V. Cardello, Michael Nestrud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Scopus citations

Abstract

A meal usually consists of several different foods presented together. This study investigates how side dishes (vegetables/starches) affect the hedonic ratings of the main food item (meat/meat substitute) when a plate of these foods is viewed and also after the meal is eaten. The main question is whether the hedonic rating of the main food item assimilates toward the hedonic rating of the side dishes or shows contrast, moving away from the hedonic rating of the side dishes. In Experiment 1, when subjects only viewed a picture of a meal consisting of an imitation chicken tender (main food item) with either hedonically positive or hedonically negative side dishes, no effect of the side dishes was seen on the hedonic rating of the main food item. In Experiment 2, when subjects ate the meal shown in the picture in Experiment 1, hedonic contrast was found. That is, the main food item was rated as less good when simultaneously presented with more hedonically positive side dishes than when presented with hedonically negative side dishes. Thus, when a meal is eaten, foods influence the evaluation of other foods on the same plate. The same is not true when foods are presented in a picture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-102
Number of pages7
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume41
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2015

Keywords

  • Hedonic context effects
  • Hedonic contrast
  • Liking
  • Meal
  • Visual presentation

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Seeing a meal is not eating it: Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this