Seeing a meal is not eating it

Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods

Monica Jimenez, David Rodriguez, Nancy Greene, Debra Zellner, Armand V. Cardello, Michael Nestrud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A meal usually consists of several different foods presented together. This study investigates how side dishes (vegetables/starches) affect the hedonic ratings of the main food item (meat/meat substitute) when a plate of these foods is viewed and also after the meal is eaten. The main question is whether the hedonic rating of the main food item assimilates toward the hedonic rating of the side dishes or shows contrast, moving away from the hedonic rating of the side dishes. In Experiment 1, when subjects only viewed a picture of a meal consisting of an imitation chicken tender (main food item) with either hedonically positive or hedonically negative side dishes, no effect of the side dishes was seen on the hedonic rating of the main food item. In Experiment 2, when subjects ate the meal shown in the picture in Experiment 1, hedonic contrast was found. That is, the main food item was rated as less good when simultaneously presented with more hedonically positive side dishes than when presented with hedonically negative side dishes. Thus, when a meal is eaten, foods influence the evaluation of other foods on the same plate. The same is not true when foods are presented in a picture.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-102
Number of pages7
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume41
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2015

Fingerprint

Pleasure
meals (menu)
Meals
Eating
ingestion
Food
meat substitutes
food analysis
Meat
vegetables
adverse effects
meat
starch
chickens
Vegetables
Starch
Chickens

Keywords

  • Hedonic context effects
  • Hedonic contrast
  • Liking
  • Meal
  • Visual presentation

Cite this

Jimenez, Monica ; Rodriguez, David ; Greene, Nancy ; Zellner, Debra ; Cardello, Armand V. ; Nestrud, Michael. / Seeing a meal is not eating it : Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods. In: Food Quality and Preference. 2015 ; Vol. 41. pp. 96-102.
@article{767ec18cba9a45bba66a368a5f35c991,
title = "Seeing a meal is not eating it: Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods",
abstract = "A meal usually consists of several different foods presented together. This study investigates how side dishes (vegetables/starches) affect the hedonic ratings of the main food item (meat/meat substitute) when a plate of these foods is viewed and also after the meal is eaten. The main question is whether the hedonic rating of the main food item assimilates toward the hedonic rating of the side dishes or shows contrast, moving away from the hedonic rating of the side dishes. In Experiment 1, when subjects only viewed a picture of a meal consisting of an imitation chicken tender (main food item) with either hedonically positive or hedonically negative side dishes, no effect of the side dishes was seen on the hedonic rating of the main food item. In Experiment 2, when subjects ate the meal shown in the picture in Experiment 1, hedonic contrast was found. That is, the main food item was rated as less good when simultaneously presented with more hedonically positive side dishes than when presented with hedonically negative side dishes. Thus, when a meal is eaten, foods influence the evaluation of other foods on the same plate. The same is not true when foods are presented in a picture.",
keywords = "Hedonic context effects, Hedonic contrast, Liking, Meal, Visual presentation",
author = "Monica Jimenez and David Rodriguez and Nancy Greene and Debra Zellner and Cardello, {Armand V.} and Michael Nestrud",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.015",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "96--102",
journal = "Food Quality and Preference",
issn = "0950-3293",
publisher = "Elsevier Ltd",

}

Seeing a meal is not eating it : Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods. / Jimenez, Monica; Rodriguez, David; Greene, Nancy; Zellner, Debra; Cardello, Armand V.; Nestrud, Michael.

In: Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 41, 01.04.2015, p. 96-102.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Seeing a meal is not eating it

T2 - Hedonic context effects differ for visually presented and actually eaten foods

AU - Jimenez, Monica

AU - Rodriguez, David

AU - Greene, Nancy

AU - Zellner, Debra

AU - Cardello, Armand V.

AU - Nestrud, Michael

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - A meal usually consists of several different foods presented together. This study investigates how side dishes (vegetables/starches) affect the hedonic ratings of the main food item (meat/meat substitute) when a plate of these foods is viewed and also after the meal is eaten. The main question is whether the hedonic rating of the main food item assimilates toward the hedonic rating of the side dishes or shows contrast, moving away from the hedonic rating of the side dishes. In Experiment 1, when subjects only viewed a picture of a meal consisting of an imitation chicken tender (main food item) with either hedonically positive or hedonically negative side dishes, no effect of the side dishes was seen on the hedonic rating of the main food item. In Experiment 2, when subjects ate the meal shown in the picture in Experiment 1, hedonic contrast was found. That is, the main food item was rated as less good when simultaneously presented with more hedonically positive side dishes than when presented with hedonically negative side dishes. Thus, when a meal is eaten, foods influence the evaluation of other foods on the same plate. The same is not true when foods are presented in a picture.

AB - A meal usually consists of several different foods presented together. This study investigates how side dishes (vegetables/starches) affect the hedonic ratings of the main food item (meat/meat substitute) when a plate of these foods is viewed and also after the meal is eaten. The main question is whether the hedonic rating of the main food item assimilates toward the hedonic rating of the side dishes or shows contrast, moving away from the hedonic rating of the side dishes. In Experiment 1, when subjects only viewed a picture of a meal consisting of an imitation chicken tender (main food item) with either hedonically positive or hedonically negative side dishes, no effect of the side dishes was seen on the hedonic rating of the main food item. In Experiment 2, when subjects ate the meal shown in the picture in Experiment 1, hedonic contrast was found. That is, the main food item was rated as less good when simultaneously presented with more hedonically positive side dishes than when presented with hedonically negative side dishes. Thus, when a meal is eaten, foods influence the evaluation of other foods on the same plate. The same is not true when foods are presented in a picture.

KW - Hedonic context effects

KW - Hedonic contrast

KW - Liking

KW - Meal

KW - Visual presentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84949116021&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.015

DO - 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.11.015

M3 - Article

VL - 41

SP - 96

EP - 102

JO - Food Quality and Preference

JF - Food Quality and Preference

SN - 0950-3293

ER -