Setting the clock forward or back? Covenant marriage and the "divorce revolution"

Laura Sanchez, Steven L. Nock, James D. Wright, Constance Gager

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In 1997, Louisiana codified a new family form by becoming the first state to pass covenant marriage legislation. Soon after, Arizona and Arkansas followed suit. This act created two marriage types with substantially different marital and divorce provisions. In spring 1998, the authors conducted qualitative interviews with focus groups consisting of covenant married couples, feminist activists, and poor women living in public housing, examining their views on marriage and divorce trends, divorce consequences, and covenant marriage. All groups were concerned about the effects of divorce on children's well-being. Beyond that, the authors found little commonality in the discourse. Instead, they found major disagreements about whether family life is in decline and whether marriage law reinforcement will improve it. Covenant married couples and feminists polarized along familiar traditionalist-feminist axes; low-income women combined feminist, liberal, and conservative views in their understanding of contemporary family trends and the perceived necessity of covenant marriage.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)91-120
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Family Issues
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2002

Fingerprint

divorce
marriage
married couple
child well-being
family law
public housing
trend
qualitative interview
reinforcement
low income
Group
legislation
discourse

Cite this

Sanchez, Laura ; Nock, Steven L. ; Wright, James D. ; Gager, Constance. / Setting the clock forward or back? Covenant marriage and the "divorce revolution". In: Journal of Family Issues. 2002 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 91-120.
@article{bfb53d96fb034ec996594ac2c5b66852,
title = "Setting the clock forward or back? Covenant marriage and the {"}divorce revolution{"}",
abstract = "In 1997, Louisiana codified a new family form by becoming the first state to pass covenant marriage legislation. Soon after, Arizona and Arkansas followed suit. This act created two marriage types with substantially different marital and divorce provisions. In spring 1998, the authors conducted qualitative interviews with focus groups consisting of covenant married couples, feminist activists, and poor women living in public housing, examining their views on marriage and divorce trends, divorce consequences, and covenant marriage. All groups were concerned about the effects of divorce on children's well-being. Beyond that, the authors found little commonality in the discourse. Instead, they found major disagreements about whether family life is in decline and whether marriage law reinforcement will improve it. Covenant married couples and feminists polarized along familiar traditionalist-feminist axes; low-income women combined feminist, liberal, and conservative views in their understanding of contemporary family trends and the perceived necessity of covenant marriage.",
author = "Laura Sanchez and Nock, {Steven L.} and Wright, {James D.} and Constance Gager",
year = "2002",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0192513X02023001005",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "91--120",
journal = "Journal of Family Issues",
issn = "0192-513X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Setting the clock forward or back? Covenant marriage and the "divorce revolution". / Sanchez, Laura; Nock, Steven L.; Wright, James D.; Gager, Constance.

In: Journal of Family Issues, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2002, p. 91-120.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Setting the clock forward or back? Covenant marriage and the "divorce revolution"

AU - Sanchez, Laura

AU - Nock, Steven L.

AU - Wright, James D.

AU - Gager, Constance

PY - 2002/1/1

Y1 - 2002/1/1

N2 - In 1997, Louisiana codified a new family form by becoming the first state to pass covenant marriage legislation. Soon after, Arizona and Arkansas followed suit. This act created two marriage types with substantially different marital and divorce provisions. In spring 1998, the authors conducted qualitative interviews with focus groups consisting of covenant married couples, feminist activists, and poor women living in public housing, examining their views on marriage and divorce trends, divorce consequences, and covenant marriage. All groups were concerned about the effects of divorce on children's well-being. Beyond that, the authors found little commonality in the discourse. Instead, they found major disagreements about whether family life is in decline and whether marriage law reinforcement will improve it. Covenant married couples and feminists polarized along familiar traditionalist-feminist axes; low-income women combined feminist, liberal, and conservative views in their understanding of contemporary family trends and the perceived necessity of covenant marriage.

AB - In 1997, Louisiana codified a new family form by becoming the first state to pass covenant marriage legislation. Soon after, Arizona and Arkansas followed suit. This act created two marriage types with substantially different marital and divorce provisions. In spring 1998, the authors conducted qualitative interviews with focus groups consisting of covenant married couples, feminist activists, and poor women living in public housing, examining their views on marriage and divorce trends, divorce consequences, and covenant marriage. All groups were concerned about the effects of divorce on children's well-being. Beyond that, the authors found little commonality in the discourse. Instead, they found major disagreements about whether family life is in decline and whether marriage law reinforcement will improve it. Covenant married couples and feminists polarized along familiar traditionalist-feminist axes; low-income women combined feminist, liberal, and conservative views in their understanding of contemporary family trends and the perceived necessity of covenant marriage.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036229414&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0192513X02023001005

DO - 10.1177/0192513X02023001005

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 91

EP - 120

JO - Journal of Family Issues

JF - Journal of Family Issues

SN - 0192-513X

IS - 1

ER -