Simultaneous attentional guidance by working-memory and selection history reveals two distinct sources of attention

Jeremy D. Schwark, Igor Dolgov, Joshua Sandry, C. Brooks Volkman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent theories of attention have proposed that selection history is a separate, dissociable source of information that influences attention. The current study sought to investigate the simultaneous involvement of selection history and working-memory on attention during visual search. Experiments 1 and 2 used target feature probability to manipulate selection history and found significant effects of both working-memory and selection history, although working-memory dominated selection history when they cued different locations. Experiment 3 eliminated the contribution of voluntary refreshing of working-memory and replicated the main effects, although selection history became dominant. Using the same methodology, but with reduced probability cue validity, both effects were present in Experiment 4 and did not significantly differ in their contribution to attention. Effects of selection history and working-memory never interacted. These results suggest that selection history and working-memory are separate influences on attention and have little impact on each other. Theoretical implications for models of attention are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)269-278
Number of pages10
JournalActa Psychologica
Volume144
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2013

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
History
Guidance
Working Memory
Cues
Theoretical Models
Experiment

Keywords

  • Attention
  • Contextual cuing
  • Probability
  • Selection history
  • Visual search
  • Working memory

Cite this

Schwark, Jeremy D. ; Dolgov, Igor ; Sandry, Joshua ; Volkman, C. Brooks. / Simultaneous attentional guidance by working-memory and selection history reveals two distinct sources of attention. In: Acta Psychologica. 2013 ; Vol. 144, No. 2. pp. 269-278.
@article{3e54c1481e5c44df9dcde7877fd63556,
title = "Simultaneous attentional guidance by working-memory and selection history reveals two distinct sources of attention",
abstract = "Recent theories of attention have proposed that selection history is a separate, dissociable source of information that influences attention. The current study sought to investigate the simultaneous involvement of selection history and working-memory on attention during visual search. Experiments 1 and 2 used target feature probability to manipulate selection history and found significant effects of both working-memory and selection history, although working-memory dominated selection history when they cued different locations. Experiment 3 eliminated the contribution of voluntary refreshing of working-memory and replicated the main effects, although selection history became dominant. Using the same methodology, but with reduced probability cue validity, both effects were present in Experiment 4 and did not significantly differ in their contribution to attention. Effects of selection history and working-memory never interacted. These results suggest that selection history and working-memory are separate influences on attention and have little impact on each other. Theoretical implications for models of attention are discussed.",
keywords = "Attention, Contextual cuing, Probability, Selection history, Visual search, Working memory",
author = "Schwark, {Jeremy D.} and Igor Dolgov and Joshua Sandry and Volkman, {C. Brooks}",
year = "2013",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.017",
language = "English",
volume = "144",
pages = "269--278",
journal = "Acta Psychologica",
issn = "0001-6918",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "2",

}

Simultaneous attentional guidance by working-memory and selection history reveals two distinct sources of attention. / Schwark, Jeremy D.; Dolgov, Igor; Sandry, Joshua; Volkman, C. Brooks.

In: Acta Psychologica, Vol. 144, No. 2, 01.10.2013, p. 269-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Simultaneous attentional guidance by working-memory and selection history reveals two distinct sources of attention

AU - Schwark, Jeremy D.

AU - Dolgov, Igor

AU - Sandry, Joshua

AU - Volkman, C. Brooks

PY - 2013/10/1

Y1 - 2013/10/1

N2 - Recent theories of attention have proposed that selection history is a separate, dissociable source of information that influences attention. The current study sought to investigate the simultaneous involvement of selection history and working-memory on attention during visual search. Experiments 1 and 2 used target feature probability to manipulate selection history and found significant effects of both working-memory and selection history, although working-memory dominated selection history when they cued different locations. Experiment 3 eliminated the contribution of voluntary refreshing of working-memory and replicated the main effects, although selection history became dominant. Using the same methodology, but with reduced probability cue validity, both effects were present in Experiment 4 and did not significantly differ in their contribution to attention. Effects of selection history and working-memory never interacted. These results suggest that selection history and working-memory are separate influences on attention and have little impact on each other. Theoretical implications for models of attention are discussed.

AB - Recent theories of attention have proposed that selection history is a separate, dissociable source of information that influences attention. The current study sought to investigate the simultaneous involvement of selection history and working-memory on attention during visual search. Experiments 1 and 2 used target feature probability to manipulate selection history and found significant effects of both working-memory and selection history, although working-memory dominated selection history when they cued different locations. Experiment 3 eliminated the contribution of voluntary refreshing of working-memory and replicated the main effects, although selection history became dominant. Using the same methodology, but with reduced probability cue validity, both effects were present in Experiment 4 and did not significantly differ in their contribution to attention. Effects of selection history and working-memory never interacted. These results suggest that selection history and working-memory are separate influences on attention and have little impact on each other. Theoretical implications for models of attention are discussed.

KW - Attention

KW - Contextual cuing

KW - Probability

KW - Selection history

KW - Visual search

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882723252&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.017

DO - 10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 23932997

AN - SCOPUS:84882723252

VL - 144

SP - 269

EP - 278

JO - Acta Psychologica

JF - Acta Psychologica

SN - 0001-6918

IS - 2

ER -