Sinners and Saints

The Role of Social Standing Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Jennifer A. Tallon, Tarika Daftary Kapur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The authors’ purpose was to examine how the social standing of victims and defendants impacted capital sentencing decision making. Participants were 305 death-qualified community members recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk workforce who acted as mock jurors in the sentencing phase of a capital trial. This experiment was a 3 Victim Impact Statement Social Standing (none, low, high) × 3 Execution Impact Evidence Social Standing (none, low, high) fully crossed, between-groups factorial design. Social standing of the victim did not directly or indirectly impact sentencing decisions, but the introduction of any form of execution impact evidence resulted in more positive evaluations of the defendant and fewer death sentences. These effects were moderated by pro-death penalty attitudes. Our findings have implications for how prosecutors and defense attorneys use character evidence to humanize victims and defendants.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)179-195
Number of pages17
JournalVictims and Offenders
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 17 Feb 2018

Fingerprint

Saints
Capital Punishment
Lawyers
evidence
Decision Making
Economics
defense attorney
death
death penalty
Turk
decision making
experiment
evaluation
community
Group

Keywords

  • capital punishment
  • sentencing
  • victim impact statements

Cite this

@article{0d518b5e41114ee1925ccbd7ea3b791e,
title = "Sinners and Saints: The Role of Social Standing Evidence in Capital Sentencing",
abstract = "The authors’ purpose was to examine how the social standing of victims and defendants impacted capital sentencing decision making. Participants were 305 death-qualified community members recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk workforce who acted as mock jurors in the sentencing phase of a capital trial. This experiment was a 3 Victim Impact Statement Social Standing (none, low, high) × 3 Execution Impact Evidence Social Standing (none, low, high) fully crossed, between-groups factorial design. Social standing of the victim did not directly or indirectly impact sentencing decisions, but the introduction of any form of execution impact evidence resulted in more positive evaluations of the defendant and fewer death sentences. These effects were moderated by pro-death penalty attitudes. Our findings have implications for how prosecutors and defense attorneys use character evidence to humanize victims and defendants.",
keywords = "capital punishment, sentencing, victim impact statements",
author = "Tallon, {Jennifer A.} and {Daftary Kapur}, Tarika",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/15564886.2016.1246394",
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "179--195",
journal = "Victims and Offenders",
issn = "1556-4886",
number = "2",

}

Sinners and Saints : The Role of Social Standing Evidence in Capital Sentencing. / Tallon, Jennifer A.; Daftary Kapur, Tarika.

In: Victims and Offenders, Vol. 13, No. 2, 17.02.2018, p. 179-195.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sinners and Saints

T2 - The Role of Social Standing Evidence in Capital Sentencing

AU - Tallon, Jennifer A.

AU - Daftary Kapur, Tarika

PY - 2018/2/17

Y1 - 2018/2/17

N2 - The authors’ purpose was to examine how the social standing of victims and defendants impacted capital sentencing decision making. Participants were 305 death-qualified community members recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk workforce who acted as mock jurors in the sentencing phase of a capital trial. This experiment was a 3 Victim Impact Statement Social Standing (none, low, high) × 3 Execution Impact Evidence Social Standing (none, low, high) fully crossed, between-groups factorial design. Social standing of the victim did not directly or indirectly impact sentencing decisions, but the introduction of any form of execution impact evidence resulted in more positive evaluations of the defendant and fewer death sentences. These effects were moderated by pro-death penalty attitudes. Our findings have implications for how prosecutors and defense attorneys use character evidence to humanize victims and defendants.

AB - The authors’ purpose was to examine how the social standing of victims and defendants impacted capital sentencing decision making. Participants were 305 death-qualified community members recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk workforce who acted as mock jurors in the sentencing phase of a capital trial. This experiment was a 3 Victim Impact Statement Social Standing (none, low, high) × 3 Execution Impact Evidence Social Standing (none, low, high) fully crossed, between-groups factorial design. Social standing of the victim did not directly or indirectly impact sentencing decisions, but the introduction of any form of execution impact evidence resulted in more positive evaluations of the defendant and fewer death sentences. These effects were moderated by pro-death penalty attitudes. Our findings have implications for how prosecutors and defense attorneys use character evidence to humanize victims and defendants.

KW - capital punishment

KW - sentencing

KW - victim impact statements

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84999666548&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15564886.2016.1246394

DO - 10.1080/15564886.2016.1246394

M3 - Article

VL - 13

SP - 179

EP - 195

JO - Victims and Offenders

JF - Victims and Offenders

SN - 1556-4886

IS - 2

ER -