Speak clearly and carry a big stock of dollar reserves: Sovereign risk, ideology, and presidential elections in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela

Tony Spanakos, Lucio R. Renno

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Partisan theories of political economy expect that bondholders will panic with the election of a left-wing presidential candidate. The latter seems to be what happened in Brazil in the 2002 presidential elections. However, quantitative analysis of perceptions of sovereign credit risk in Argentine, Brazilian, Mexican, and Venezuelan presidential elections from 1994 until 2007 shows no real evidence of a link between partisanship and perceptions of risk, even if the left-right divide is further broken down into left, center-left, center-right, right. Instead, international and domestic economic fundamentals have a stronger influence on risk evaluations. Qualitative analysis of the individual presidential elections shows the importance of policy uncertainty in explaining why certain electoral periods seemed more critical than others and how bondholders select between multiple equilibria. This research helps shift political analysis away from partisanship and more in the direction of policies and articulation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1292-1316
Number of pages25
JournalComparative Political Studies
Volume42
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Oct 2009

Fingerprint

Venezuela
presidential election
Argentina
dollar
ideology
Brazil
Mexico
political economy
credit
candidacy
election
uncertainty
evaluation
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • Latin America
  • Partisan theories
  • Political economy
  • Political uncertainty
  • Sovereign risk

Cite this

@article{8c22c98475134db2b96ea82627c00074,
title = "Speak clearly and carry a big stock of dollar reserves: Sovereign risk, ideology, and presidential elections in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela",
abstract = "Partisan theories of political economy expect that bondholders will panic with the election of a left-wing presidential candidate. The latter seems to be what happened in Brazil in the 2002 presidential elections. However, quantitative analysis of perceptions of sovereign credit risk in Argentine, Brazilian, Mexican, and Venezuelan presidential elections from 1994 until 2007 shows no real evidence of a link between partisanship and perceptions of risk, even if the left-right divide is further broken down into left, center-left, center-right, right. Instead, international and domestic economic fundamentals have a stronger influence on risk evaluations. Qualitative analysis of the individual presidential elections shows the importance of policy uncertainty in explaining why certain electoral periods seemed more critical than others and how bondholders select between multiple equilibria. This research helps shift political analysis away from partisanship and more in the direction of policies and articulation.",
keywords = "Latin America, Partisan theories, Political economy, Political uncertainty, Sovereign risk",
author = "Tony Spanakos and Renno, {Lucio R.}",
year = "2009",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0010414009331711",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1292--1316",
journal = "Comparative Political Studies",
issn = "0010-4140",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "10",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Speak clearly and carry a big stock of dollar reserves

T2 - Sovereign risk, ideology, and presidential elections in Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, and Venezuela

AU - Spanakos, Tony

AU - Renno, Lucio R.

PY - 2009/10/1

Y1 - 2009/10/1

N2 - Partisan theories of political economy expect that bondholders will panic with the election of a left-wing presidential candidate. The latter seems to be what happened in Brazil in the 2002 presidential elections. However, quantitative analysis of perceptions of sovereign credit risk in Argentine, Brazilian, Mexican, and Venezuelan presidential elections from 1994 until 2007 shows no real evidence of a link between partisanship and perceptions of risk, even if the left-right divide is further broken down into left, center-left, center-right, right. Instead, international and domestic economic fundamentals have a stronger influence on risk evaluations. Qualitative analysis of the individual presidential elections shows the importance of policy uncertainty in explaining why certain electoral periods seemed more critical than others and how bondholders select between multiple equilibria. This research helps shift political analysis away from partisanship and more in the direction of policies and articulation.

AB - Partisan theories of political economy expect that bondholders will panic with the election of a left-wing presidential candidate. The latter seems to be what happened in Brazil in the 2002 presidential elections. However, quantitative analysis of perceptions of sovereign credit risk in Argentine, Brazilian, Mexican, and Venezuelan presidential elections from 1994 until 2007 shows no real evidence of a link between partisanship and perceptions of risk, even if the left-right divide is further broken down into left, center-left, center-right, right. Instead, international and domestic economic fundamentals have a stronger influence on risk evaluations. Qualitative analysis of the individual presidential elections shows the importance of policy uncertainty in explaining why certain electoral periods seemed more critical than others and how bondholders select between multiple equilibria. This research helps shift political analysis away from partisanship and more in the direction of policies and articulation.

KW - Latin America

KW - Partisan theories

KW - Political economy

KW - Political uncertainty

KW - Sovereign risk

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70349266450&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0010414009331711

DO - 10.1177/0010414009331711

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70349266450

VL - 42

SP - 1292

EP - 1316

JO - Comparative Political Studies

JF - Comparative Political Studies

SN - 0010-4140

IS - 10

ER -