Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language

Laura Lakusta, Barbara Landau

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

93 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We explored the linguistic encoding of Paths in children between the ages of three and seven, in children with Williams syndrome, and in normal adults, focusing specifically on Source and Goal Paths. The results showed an asymmetry, with Goal Paths regularly and systematically encoded, but Source Paths often omitted. This pattern occurred among all groups and across a broad range of domains including Manner of Motion, Change of Possession, Change of State, and Attachment/Detachment events. It also occurred whether participants spontaneously described events or were asked to use a specific verb that biased them towards a Goal or Source Path (e.g. 'give' vs. 'get'). The results are discussed in terms of non-linguistic foundations of spatial language and the linguistic mapping biases that arise when we describe what we see.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-33
Number of pages33
JournalCognition
Volume96
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2005

Fingerprint

Language
Linguistics
linguistics
event
language
possession
asymmetry
Williams Syndrome
trend
Group
Spatial Language
Detachment
Encoding
Change of State
Possession
Asymmetry
Verbs

Keywords

  • Conceptual representations
  • Events
  • Goal
  • Paths
  • Semantics
  • Source
  • Spatial language
  • Syntax
  • Williams syndrome

Cite this

Lakusta, Laura ; Landau, Barbara. / Starting at the end : The importance of goals in spatial language. In: Cognition. 2005 ; Vol. 96, No. 1. pp. 1-33.
@article{4d7253b21fb248278a6d50a8f85daff9,
title = "Starting at the end: The importance of goals in spatial language",
abstract = "We explored the linguistic encoding of Paths in children between the ages of three and seven, in children with Williams syndrome, and in normal adults, focusing specifically on Source and Goal Paths. The results showed an asymmetry, with Goal Paths regularly and systematically encoded, but Source Paths often omitted. This pattern occurred among all groups and across a broad range of domains including Manner of Motion, Change of Possession, Change of State, and Attachment/Detachment events. It also occurred whether participants spontaneously described events or were asked to use a specific verb that biased them towards a Goal or Source Path (e.g. 'give' vs. 'get'). The results are discussed in terms of non-linguistic foundations of spatial language and the linguistic mapping biases that arise when we describe what we see.",
keywords = "Conceptual representations, Events, Goal, Paths, Semantics, Source, Spatial language, Syntax, Williams syndrome",
author = "Laura Lakusta and Barbara Landau",
year = "2005",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009",
language = "English",
volume = "96",
pages = "1--33",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Starting at the end : The importance of goals in spatial language. / Lakusta, Laura; Landau, Barbara.

In: Cognition, Vol. 96, No. 1, 01.01.2005, p. 1-33.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Starting at the end

T2 - The importance of goals in spatial language

AU - Lakusta, Laura

AU - Landau, Barbara

PY - 2005/1/1

Y1 - 2005/1/1

N2 - We explored the linguistic encoding of Paths in children between the ages of three and seven, in children with Williams syndrome, and in normal adults, focusing specifically on Source and Goal Paths. The results showed an asymmetry, with Goal Paths regularly and systematically encoded, but Source Paths often omitted. This pattern occurred among all groups and across a broad range of domains including Manner of Motion, Change of Possession, Change of State, and Attachment/Detachment events. It also occurred whether participants spontaneously described events or were asked to use a specific verb that biased them towards a Goal or Source Path (e.g. 'give' vs. 'get'). The results are discussed in terms of non-linguistic foundations of spatial language and the linguistic mapping biases that arise when we describe what we see.

AB - We explored the linguistic encoding of Paths in children between the ages of three and seven, in children with Williams syndrome, and in normal adults, focusing specifically on Source and Goal Paths. The results showed an asymmetry, with Goal Paths regularly and systematically encoded, but Source Paths often omitted. This pattern occurred among all groups and across a broad range of domains including Manner of Motion, Change of Possession, Change of State, and Attachment/Detachment events. It also occurred whether participants spontaneously described events or were asked to use a specific verb that biased them towards a Goal or Source Path (e.g. 'give' vs. 'get'). The results are discussed in terms of non-linguistic foundations of spatial language and the linguistic mapping biases that arise when we describe what we see.

KW - Conceptual representations

KW - Events

KW - Goal

KW - Paths

KW - Semantics

KW - Source

KW - Spatial language

KW - Syntax

KW - Williams syndrome

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=17044407990&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.03.009

M3 - Article

C2 - 15833305

AN - SCOPUS:17044407990

VL - 96

SP - 1

EP - 33

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 1

ER -