TY - JOUR
T1 - Student thought and classroom language
T2 - Examining the mechanisms of change in dialogic teaching
AU - Reznitskaya, Alina
AU - Gregory, Maughn
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Dialogue, as a communication form characterized by its commitment to inclusiveness and rationality, has long been advocated by educators as a mechanism for helping students become better thinkers. Unfortunately, numerous claims about the educational potential of participating in dialogue have not resulted in substantial changes in classroom practices. Studies have consistently shown that in today's schools the dominant discourse remains largely monologic. In this article, we present a testable theory of change that suggests how sociocultural processes in a dialogic classroom influence students' development.We identify and discuss three learning outcomes of dialogic teaching, including epistemological understanding, argument skills, and disciplinary knowledge. We then critically review empirical research related to the proposed theory, highlighting unsolved questions, inconsistencies, and directions for future studies. Finally, we focus on the implications of the proposed integrated theory and reviewed research for teachers and their language use in a classroom.
AB - Dialogue, as a communication form characterized by its commitment to inclusiveness and rationality, has long been advocated by educators as a mechanism for helping students become better thinkers. Unfortunately, numerous claims about the educational potential of participating in dialogue have not resulted in substantial changes in classroom practices. Studies have consistently shown that in today's schools the dominant discourse remains largely monologic. In this article, we present a testable theory of change that suggests how sociocultural processes in a dialogic classroom influence students' development.We identify and discuss three learning outcomes of dialogic teaching, including epistemological understanding, argument skills, and disciplinary knowledge. We then critically review empirical research related to the proposed theory, highlighting unsolved questions, inconsistencies, and directions for future studies. Finally, we focus on the implications of the proposed integrated theory and reviewed research for teachers and their language use in a classroom.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84878963833&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
DO - 10.1080/00461520.2013.775898
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:84878963833
SN - 0046-1520
VL - 48
SP - 114
EP - 133
JO - Educational Psychologist
JF - Educational Psychologist
IS - 2
ER -