Superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers relative to consistent-right-handers

Ruth Propper, Andrew Wolfarth, Christophe Carlei, Tad T. Brunye, Stephen D. Christman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Categorical versus coordinate spatial tasks rely differentially on the left versus right hemisphere. Given the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological differences between inconsistent- versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH, respectively), such that the former demonstrates increased access to right hemisphere processes relative to the latter, it was hypothesized that ICH would outperform CRH on a test of coordinate spatial knowledge. Previous work demonstrating reliance on the right hemisphere for both categorical and coordinate information in non-right-handers using lateralized stimuli of brief duration suggested ICH might also outperform CRH on a categorical task as well. Participants navigated a virtual environment, landmark-to-landmark, within a 3-dimensional first-person point of view with high ecological validity, and then were tested on either their categorical or coordinate spatial knowledge. ICH were superior relative to the CRH on both types of spatial knowledge. Additionally, ICH navigated the environment during learning more quickly, and reported being more confident in their knowledge of the location of landmarks within the environment, compared with CRH. Results are discussed in terms of potential handedness differences in spatial ability generally.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-288
Number of pages15
JournalLaterality
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 4 May 2019

Fingerprint

Task Performance and Analysis
Functional Laterality
Learning
Categorical
Landmarks
Right Hemisphere
Spatial Navigation

Keywords

  • Handedness
  • categorical
  • coordinate
  • hemispheric asymmetry
  • spatial ability

Cite this

Propper, Ruth ; Wolfarth, Andrew ; Carlei, Christophe ; Brunye, Tad T. ; Christman, Stephen D. / Superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers relative to consistent-right-handers. In: Laterality. 2019 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 274-288.
@article{0380be3711424b6cabc5312c4ee5cf84,
title = "Superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers relative to consistent-right-handers",
abstract = "Categorical versus coordinate spatial tasks rely differentially on the left versus right hemisphere. Given the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological differences between inconsistent- versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH, respectively), such that the former demonstrates increased access to right hemisphere processes relative to the latter, it was hypothesized that ICH would outperform CRH on a test of coordinate spatial knowledge. Previous work demonstrating reliance on the right hemisphere for both categorical and coordinate information in non-right-handers using lateralized stimuli of brief duration suggested ICH might also outperform CRH on a categorical task as well. Participants navigated a virtual environment, landmark-to-landmark, within a 3-dimensional first-person point of view with high ecological validity, and then were tested on either their categorical or coordinate spatial knowledge. ICH were superior relative to the CRH on both types of spatial knowledge. Additionally, ICH navigated the environment during learning more quickly, and reported being more confident in their knowledge of the location of landmarks within the environment, compared with CRH. Results are discussed in terms of potential handedness differences in spatial ability generally.",
keywords = "Handedness, categorical, coordinate, hemispheric asymmetry, spatial ability",
author = "Ruth Propper and Andrew Wolfarth and Christophe Carlei and Brunye, {Tad T.} and Christman, {Stephen D.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/1357650X.2018.1503287",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "274--288",
journal = "Laterality",
issn = "1357-650X",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "3",

}

Superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers relative to consistent-right-handers. / Propper, Ruth; Wolfarth, Andrew; Carlei, Christophe; Brunye, Tad T.; Christman, Stephen D.

In: Laterality, Vol. 24, No. 3, 04.05.2019, p. 274-288.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Superior categorical and coordinate spatial task performance in inconsistent-handers relative to consistent-right-handers

AU - Propper, Ruth

AU - Wolfarth, Andrew

AU - Carlei, Christophe

AU - Brunye, Tad T.

AU - Christman, Stephen D.

PY - 2019/5/4

Y1 - 2019/5/4

N2 - Categorical versus coordinate spatial tasks rely differentially on the left versus right hemisphere. Given the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological differences between inconsistent- versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH, respectively), such that the former demonstrates increased access to right hemisphere processes relative to the latter, it was hypothesized that ICH would outperform CRH on a test of coordinate spatial knowledge. Previous work demonstrating reliance on the right hemisphere for both categorical and coordinate information in non-right-handers using lateralized stimuli of brief duration suggested ICH might also outperform CRH on a categorical task as well. Participants navigated a virtual environment, landmark-to-landmark, within a 3-dimensional first-person point of view with high ecological validity, and then were tested on either their categorical or coordinate spatial knowledge. ICH were superior relative to the CRH on both types of spatial knowledge. Additionally, ICH navigated the environment during learning more quickly, and reported being more confident in their knowledge of the location of landmarks within the environment, compared with CRH. Results are discussed in terms of potential handedness differences in spatial ability generally.

AB - Categorical versus coordinate spatial tasks rely differentially on the left versus right hemisphere. Given the neuroanatomical and neurophysiological differences between inconsistent- versus consistent-right-handers (ICH versus CRH, respectively), such that the former demonstrates increased access to right hemisphere processes relative to the latter, it was hypothesized that ICH would outperform CRH on a test of coordinate spatial knowledge. Previous work demonstrating reliance on the right hemisphere for both categorical and coordinate information in non-right-handers using lateralized stimuli of brief duration suggested ICH might also outperform CRH on a categorical task as well. Participants navigated a virtual environment, landmark-to-landmark, within a 3-dimensional first-person point of view with high ecological validity, and then were tested on either their categorical or coordinate spatial knowledge. ICH were superior relative to the CRH on both types of spatial knowledge. Additionally, ICH navigated the environment during learning more quickly, and reported being more confident in their knowledge of the location of landmarks within the environment, compared with CRH. Results are discussed in terms of potential handedness differences in spatial ability generally.

KW - Handedness

KW - categorical

KW - coordinate

KW - hemispheric asymmetry

KW - spatial ability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050528195&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1503287

DO - 10.1080/1357650X.2018.1503287

M3 - Article

VL - 24

SP - 274

EP - 288

JO - Laterality

JF - Laterality

SN - 1357-650X

IS - 3

ER -