Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty

Helmut Leder, Pablo Tinio, David Brieber, Tonio Kröner, Thomas Jacobsen, Raphael Rosenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scientific disciplines as diverse as biology, physics, and psychological aesthetics regard symmetry as one of the most important principles in nature and one of the most powerful determinants of beauty. However, symmetry has a low standing in the arts and humanities. This difference in the valuation of symmetry is a remarkable illustration of the gap between the two cultures. To close this gap, we conducted an interdisciplinary, empirical study to directly demonstrate the effects of art expertise on symmetry appreciation. Two groups of art experts—artists and art historians—and a group of non-experts provided spontaneous beauty ratings of visual stimuli that varied in symmetry and complexity. In complete contrast to responses typically found in non-art experts, art experts found asymmetrical and simple stimuli as most beautiful. This is evidence of the effects of specific education and training on aesthetic appreciation and a direct challenge to the universality of symmetry.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)104-114
Number of pages11
JournalEmpirical Studies of the Arts
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2019

Fingerprint

Symmetry
Art
Scientific Discipline
Education
Empirical Study
Rating
Two Cultures
Stimulus
Aesthetics
Psychological
Aesthetic Appreciation
Asymmetrical
Physics
Expertise
Universality
Visual Stimuli

Keywords

  • aesthetics
  • expertise
  • preference
  • symmetry

Cite this

Leder, H., Tinio, P., Brieber, D., Kröner, T., Jacobsen, T., & Rosenberg, R. (2019). Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 37(1), 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418777941
Leder, Helmut ; Tinio, Pablo ; Brieber, David ; Kröner, Tonio ; Jacobsen, Thomas ; Rosenberg, Raphael. / Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty. In: Empirical Studies of the Arts. 2019 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 104-114.
@article{4eb6ad403c4e4ffa80fc45d3feb99f28,
title = "Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty",
abstract = "Scientific disciplines as diverse as biology, physics, and psychological aesthetics regard symmetry as one of the most important principles in nature and one of the most powerful determinants of beauty. However, symmetry has a low standing in the arts and humanities. This difference in the valuation of symmetry is a remarkable illustration of the gap between the two cultures. To close this gap, we conducted an interdisciplinary, empirical study to directly demonstrate the effects of art expertise on symmetry appreciation. Two groups of art experts—artists and art historians—and a group of non-experts provided spontaneous beauty ratings of visual stimuli that varied in symmetry and complexity. In complete contrast to responses typically found in non-art experts, art experts found asymmetrical and simple stimuli as most beautiful. This is evidence of the effects of specific education and training on aesthetic appreciation and a direct challenge to the universality of symmetry.",
keywords = "aesthetics, expertise, preference, symmetry",
author = "Helmut Leder and Pablo Tinio and David Brieber and Tonio Kr{\"o}ner and Thomas Jacobsen and Raphael Rosenberg",
year = "2019",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0276237418777941",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "104--114",
journal = "Empirical Studies of the Arts",
issn = "0276-2374",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Leder, H, Tinio, P, Brieber, D, Kröner, T, Jacobsen, T & Rosenberg, R 2019, 'Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty', Empirical Studies of the Arts, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 104-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418777941

Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty. / Leder, Helmut; Tinio, Pablo; Brieber, David; Kröner, Tonio; Jacobsen, Thomas; Rosenberg, Raphael.

In: Empirical Studies of the Arts, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2019, p. 104-114.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty

AU - Leder, Helmut

AU - Tinio, Pablo

AU - Brieber, David

AU - Kröner, Tonio

AU - Jacobsen, Thomas

AU - Rosenberg, Raphael

PY - 2019/1/1

Y1 - 2019/1/1

N2 - Scientific disciplines as diverse as biology, physics, and psychological aesthetics regard symmetry as one of the most important principles in nature and one of the most powerful determinants of beauty. However, symmetry has a low standing in the arts and humanities. This difference in the valuation of symmetry is a remarkable illustration of the gap between the two cultures. To close this gap, we conducted an interdisciplinary, empirical study to directly demonstrate the effects of art expertise on symmetry appreciation. Two groups of art experts—artists and art historians—and a group of non-experts provided spontaneous beauty ratings of visual stimuli that varied in symmetry and complexity. In complete contrast to responses typically found in non-art experts, art experts found asymmetrical and simple stimuli as most beautiful. This is evidence of the effects of specific education and training on aesthetic appreciation and a direct challenge to the universality of symmetry.

AB - Scientific disciplines as diverse as biology, physics, and psychological aesthetics regard symmetry as one of the most important principles in nature and one of the most powerful determinants of beauty. However, symmetry has a low standing in the arts and humanities. This difference in the valuation of symmetry is a remarkable illustration of the gap between the two cultures. To close this gap, we conducted an interdisciplinary, empirical study to directly demonstrate the effects of art expertise on symmetry appreciation. Two groups of art experts—artists and art historians—and a group of non-experts provided spontaneous beauty ratings of visual stimuli that varied in symmetry and complexity. In complete contrast to responses typically found in non-art experts, art experts found asymmetrical and simple stimuli as most beautiful. This is evidence of the effects of specific education and training on aesthetic appreciation and a direct challenge to the universality of symmetry.

KW - aesthetics

KW - expertise

KW - preference

KW - symmetry

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048819734&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0276237418777941

DO - 10.1177/0276237418777941

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048819734

VL - 37

SP - 104

EP - 114

JO - Empirical Studies of the Arts

JF - Empirical Studies of the Arts

SN - 0276-2374

IS - 1

ER -

Leder H, Tinio P, Brieber D, Kröner T, Jacobsen T, Rosenberg R. Symmetry Is Not a Universal Law of Beauty. Empirical Studies of the Arts. 2019 Jan 1;37(1):104-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0276237418777941