Abstract
This article provides a cultural and political critique of the constitution of bilingual/English-as-a-second-language (ESL) education as a disciplinary practice in the case of New Mexico. Using genealogy and postcolonial, poststructural, and critical frameworks, this article claims that the directions advanced by the Chicano/Chicana movement were lost. Instead, what emerged was a field that nurtured a mix of symbolic colonization and docilization through the construction of a settlement that controls thought and behavior, perpetuating misrecognition in a Bourdieuian sense. Illusion, collusion, and delusion have enabled the dominance of psycholinguistic approaches. Problematizing the constitution of bilingual/ESL education within a cultural and political sphere could foster an emancipatory education for marginalized students.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 419-441 |
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Review of Educational Research |
| Volume | 70 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2000 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The constitution of bilingual/ESL education as a disciplinary practice: Genealogical explorations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver