The emerging standard of competence in immigration removal proceedings: A review for forensic mental health professionals

Sarah Filone, Christopher M. King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Forensic mental health professionals are likely to become increasingly involved in immigration court proceedings in coming years; however, little published work has discussed the significance of recent developments for forensic mental health assessment. Removal (i.e., deportation and exclusion) proceedings are complex and highly consequential hearings during which immigration respondents have a right to be meaningfully heard. Due to the civil nature of the hearings, immigration respondents are not afforded the same rights as criminal defendants (e.g., appointment of counsel, competent participation). The past 3 years have seen substantial changes to the standards for identifying and assessing competence issues within immigration proceedings, and the United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review recently released the first set of guidelines for this emerging area of forensic mental health assessment. In this article, we summarize legal developments that have given rise to an emerging competence standard in removal proceedings, analyze the first official competence-for-removal standard and framework, and call attention to some pressing practice, ethical, and policy issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-71
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • Competence
  • Forensic assessment
  • Immigration court
  • Mental health
  • Removal proceedings

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'The emerging standard of competence in immigration removal proceedings: A review for forensic mental health professionals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this