The emerging standard of competence in immigration removal proceedings: A review for forensic mental health professionals

Sarah Filone, Christopher King

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Forensic mental health professionals are likely to become increasingly involved in immigration court proceedings in coming years; however, little published work has discussed the significance of recent developments for forensic mental health assessment. Removal (i.e., deportation and exclusion) proceedings are complex and highly consequential hearings during which immigration respondents have a right to be meaningfully heard. Due to the civil nature of the hearings, immigration respondents are not afforded the same rights as criminal defendants (e.g., appointment of counsel, competent participation). The past 3 years have seen substantial changes to the standards for identifying and assessing competence issues within immigration proceedings, and the United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review recently released the first set of guidelines for this emerging area of forensic mental health assessment. In this article, we summarize legal developments that have given rise to an emerging competence standard in removal proceedings, analyze the first official competence-for-removal standard and framework, and call attention to some pressing practice, ethical, and policy issues.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)60-71
Number of pages12
JournalPsychology, Public Policy, and Law
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

Emigration and Immigration
health professionals
Mental Competency
Mental Health
immigration
mental health
Hearing
deportation
Social Justice
Ethics
Appointments and Schedules
exclusion
justice
Guidelines
participation
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Competence
  • Forensic assessment
  • Immigration court
  • Mental health
  • Removal proceedings

Cite this

@article{bf1340c159af4d2ebc41671f0930b5b0,
title = "The emerging standard of competence in immigration removal proceedings: A review for forensic mental health professionals",
abstract = "Forensic mental health professionals are likely to become increasingly involved in immigration court proceedings in coming years; however, little published work has discussed the significance of recent developments for forensic mental health assessment. Removal (i.e., deportation and exclusion) proceedings are complex and highly consequential hearings during which immigration respondents have a right to be meaningfully heard. Due to the civil nature of the hearings, immigration respondents are not afforded the same rights as criminal defendants (e.g., appointment of counsel, competent participation). The past 3 years have seen substantial changes to the standards for identifying and assessing competence issues within immigration proceedings, and the United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review recently released the first set of guidelines for this emerging area of forensic mental health assessment. In this article, we summarize legal developments that have given rise to an emerging competence standard in removal proceedings, analyze the first official competence-for-removal standard and framework, and call attention to some pressing practice, ethical, and policy issues.",
keywords = "Competence, Forensic assessment, Immigration court, Mental health, Removal proceedings",
author = "Sarah Filone and Christopher King",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1037/law0000032",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "60--71",
journal = "Psychology, Public Policy, and Law",
issn = "1076-8971",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - The emerging standard of competence in immigration removal proceedings

T2 - A review for forensic mental health professionals

AU - Filone, Sarah

AU - King, Christopher

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Forensic mental health professionals are likely to become increasingly involved in immigration court proceedings in coming years; however, little published work has discussed the significance of recent developments for forensic mental health assessment. Removal (i.e., deportation and exclusion) proceedings are complex and highly consequential hearings during which immigration respondents have a right to be meaningfully heard. Due to the civil nature of the hearings, immigration respondents are not afforded the same rights as criminal defendants (e.g., appointment of counsel, competent participation). The past 3 years have seen substantial changes to the standards for identifying and assessing competence issues within immigration proceedings, and the United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review recently released the first set of guidelines for this emerging area of forensic mental health assessment. In this article, we summarize legal developments that have given rise to an emerging competence standard in removal proceedings, analyze the first official competence-for-removal standard and framework, and call attention to some pressing practice, ethical, and policy issues.

AB - Forensic mental health professionals are likely to become increasingly involved in immigration court proceedings in coming years; however, little published work has discussed the significance of recent developments for forensic mental health assessment. Removal (i.e., deportation and exclusion) proceedings are complex and highly consequential hearings during which immigration respondents have a right to be meaningfully heard. Due to the civil nature of the hearings, immigration respondents are not afforded the same rights as criminal defendants (e.g., appointment of counsel, competent participation). The past 3 years have seen substantial changes to the standards for identifying and assessing competence issues within immigration proceedings, and the United States Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review recently released the first set of guidelines for this emerging area of forensic mental health assessment. In this article, we summarize legal developments that have given rise to an emerging competence standard in removal proceedings, analyze the first official competence-for-removal standard and framework, and call attention to some pressing practice, ethical, and policy issues.

KW - Competence

KW - Forensic assessment

KW - Immigration court

KW - Mental health

KW - Removal proceedings

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84925610495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/law0000032

DO - 10.1037/law0000032

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84925610495

VL - 21

SP - 60

EP - 71

JO - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

JF - Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

SN - 1076-8971

IS - 1

ER -