The intention-to-CAUSE bias

Evidence from children's causal language

Paul Muentener, Laura Lakusta

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current study explored causal language in 3.5- to 4-year-old children by manipulating the type of agent (human acting intentionally or unintentionally, or inanimate object) and the type of effect (motion or state change) in causal events. Experiment 1 found that the type of agent, but not the type of effect, influenced children's production of causal language. Children produced more causal language for intentionally caused events than for either unintentionally- or object-caused events, independent of the type of effect. Experiment 2, which tested children's judgments of descriptions for the events, found a similar pattern. Children preferred causal descriptions more for the intentionally caused events than the unintentionally- and the object-caused events. Experiment 3 found no evidence of bias in children's non-linguistic representations of the events. Taken together, these results suggest an intention-to-CAUSE bias in children's mapping of conceptual representations of causality into linguistic structure. We discuss the implications of these results for the acquisition of causal language and for the development of conceptual representations of causality.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-355
Number of pages15
JournalCognition
Volume119
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2011

Fingerprint

Child Language
event
trend
language
evidence
Language
causality
Causality
experiment
Language Development
Linguistics
Causal
Intentions
linguistics

Keywords

  • Causal reasoning
  • Intentionality
  • Language
  • Michotte
  • Piaget

Cite this

@article{38535760b5354416b989f5f1d421ff1e,
title = "The intention-to-CAUSE bias: Evidence from children's causal language",
abstract = "The current study explored causal language in 3.5- to 4-year-old children by manipulating the type of agent (human acting intentionally or unintentionally, or inanimate object) and the type of effect (motion or state change) in causal events. Experiment 1 found that the type of agent, but not the type of effect, influenced children's production of causal language. Children produced more causal language for intentionally caused events than for either unintentionally- or object-caused events, independent of the type of effect. Experiment 2, which tested children's judgments of descriptions for the events, found a similar pattern. Children preferred causal descriptions more for the intentionally caused events than the unintentionally- and the object-caused events. Experiment 3 found no evidence of bias in children's non-linguistic representations of the events. Taken together, these results suggest an intention-to-CAUSE bias in children's mapping of conceptual representations of causality into linguistic structure. We discuss the implications of these results for the acquisition of causal language and for the development of conceptual representations of causality.",
keywords = "Causal reasoning, Intentionality, Language, Michotte, Piaget",
author = "Paul Muentener and Laura Lakusta",
year = "2011",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.017",
language = "English",
volume = "119",
pages = "341--355",
journal = "Cognition",
issn = "0010-0277",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

The intention-to-CAUSE bias : Evidence from children's causal language. / Muentener, Paul; Lakusta, Laura.

In: Cognition, Vol. 119, No. 3, 01.06.2011, p. 341-355.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The intention-to-CAUSE bias

T2 - Evidence from children's causal language

AU - Muentener, Paul

AU - Lakusta, Laura

PY - 2011/6/1

Y1 - 2011/6/1

N2 - The current study explored causal language in 3.5- to 4-year-old children by manipulating the type of agent (human acting intentionally or unintentionally, or inanimate object) and the type of effect (motion or state change) in causal events. Experiment 1 found that the type of agent, but not the type of effect, influenced children's production of causal language. Children produced more causal language for intentionally caused events than for either unintentionally- or object-caused events, independent of the type of effect. Experiment 2, which tested children's judgments of descriptions for the events, found a similar pattern. Children preferred causal descriptions more for the intentionally caused events than the unintentionally- and the object-caused events. Experiment 3 found no evidence of bias in children's non-linguistic representations of the events. Taken together, these results suggest an intention-to-CAUSE bias in children's mapping of conceptual representations of causality into linguistic structure. We discuss the implications of these results for the acquisition of causal language and for the development of conceptual representations of causality.

AB - The current study explored causal language in 3.5- to 4-year-old children by manipulating the type of agent (human acting intentionally or unintentionally, or inanimate object) and the type of effect (motion or state change) in causal events. Experiment 1 found that the type of agent, but not the type of effect, influenced children's production of causal language. Children produced more causal language for intentionally caused events than for either unintentionally- or object-caused events, independent of the type of effect. Experiment 2, which tested children's judgments of descriptions for the events, found a similar pattern. Children preferred causal descriptions more for the intentionally caused events than the unintentionally- and the object-caused events. Experiment 3 found no evidence of bias in children's non-linguistic representations of the events. Taken together, these results suggest an intention-to-CAUSE bias in children's mapping of conceptual representations of causality into linguistic structure. We discuss the implications of these results for the acquisition of causal language and for the development of conceptual representations of causality.

KW - Causal reasoning

KW - Intentionality

KW - Language

KW - Michotte

KW - Piaget

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79953315191&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.017

DO - 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.01.017

M3 - Article

VL - 119

SP - 341

EP - 355

JO - Cognition

JF - Cognition

SN - 0010-0277

IS - 3

ER -