The Job Interview and Cognitive Performance

Does Structure Reduce Performance on Selection Batteries, and Can Explanation of Purpose Improve It?

Jennifer Bragger, Eugene J. Kutcher, Gaynell Schettino, Bridget Muzyczyn, Pamela Farago, Emily Fritzky

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Structuring job interviews is a method of decreasing bias and increasing the predictive validity of job performance, but research suggests that applicants can react negatively to structure (Chapman & Zweig, 2005) and that negative attitudes about selection tools can predict performance (Hausknecht, Day, & Thomas, 2004). The current exploratory study investigates how structuring the job interview in conjunction with priming the ethnicity and sex of the applicant, and in some conditions providing an explanation of the structure, affected post-interview cognitive ability performance. Three levels of structure were randomly assigned. Those who experienced a structured interview without an explanation of its purpose scored lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview, but those who experienced a structured interview with an explanation of its purpose did not score lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview. Scores differed for females and Hispanics depending on the structure condition, but not in the same manner. Implications for recruitment, selection, and performance management are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)97-124
Number of pages28
JournalPerformance Improvement Quarterly
Volume29
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2016

Fingerprint

job interview
interview
performance
applicant
job performance
cognitive ability
ethnicity
trend
management

Cite this

Bragger, Jennifer ; Kutcher, Eugene J. ; Schettino, Gaynell ; Muzyczyn, Bridget ; Farago, Pamela ; Fritzky, Emily. / The Job Interview and Cognitive Performance : Does Structure Reduce Performance on Selection Batteries, and Can Explanation of Purpose Improve It?. In: Performance Improvement Quarterly. 2016 ; Vol. 29, No. 2. pp. 97-124.
@article{4e577fe8d6604c78ab4c54ac4d6ca0e7,
title = "The Job Interview and Cognitive Performance: Does Structure Reduce Performance on Selection Batteries, and Can Explanation of Purpose Improve It?",
abstract = "Structuring job interviews is a method of decreasing bias and increasing the predictive validity of job performance, but research suggests that applicants can react negatively to structure (Chapman & Zweig, 2005) and that negative attitudes about selection tools can predict performance (Hausknecht, Day, & Thomas, 2004). The current exploratory study investigates how structuring the job interview in conjunction with priming the ethnicity and sex of the applicant, and in some conditions providing an explanation of the structure, affected post-interview cognitive ability performance. Three levels of structure were randomly assigned. Those who experienced a structured interview without an explanation of its purpose scored lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview, but those who experienced a structured interview with an explanation of its purpose did not score lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview. Scores differed for females and Hispanics depending on the structure condition, but not in the same manner. Implications for recruitment, selection, and performance management are discussed.",
author = "Jennifer Bragger and Kutcher, {Eugene J.} and Gaynell Schettino and Bridget Muzyczyn and Pamela Farago and Emily Fritzky",
year = "2016",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/piq.21218",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "97--124",
journal = "Performance Improvement Quarterly",
issn = "0898-5952",
publisher = "International Society for Performance Improvement",
number = "2",

}

The Job Interview and Cognitive Performance : Does Structure Reduce Performance on Selection Batteries, and Can Explanation of Purpose Improve It? / Bragger, Jennifer; Kutcher, Eugene J.; Schettino, Gaynell; Muzyczyn, Bridget; Farago, Pamela; Fritzky, Emily.

In: Performance Improvement Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 2, 01.01.2016, p. 97-124.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Job Interview and Cognitive Performance

T2 - Does Structure Reduce Performance on Selection Batteries, and Can Explanation of Purpose Improve It?

AU - Bragger, Jennifer

AU - Kutcher, Eugene J.

AU - Schettino, Gaynell

AU - Muzyczyn, Bridget

AU - Farago, Pamela

AU - Fritzky, Emily

PY - 2016/1/1

Y1 - 2016/1/1

N2 - Structuring job interviews is a method of decreasing bias and increasing the predictive validity of job performance, but research suggests that applicants can react negatively to structure (Chapman & Zweig, 2005) and that negative attitudes about selection tools can predict performance (Hausknecht, Day, & Thomas, 2004). The current exploratory study investigates how structuring the job interview in conjunction with priming the ethnicity and sex of the applicant, and in some conditions providing an explanation of the structure, affected post-interview cognitive ability performance. Three levels of structure were randomly assigned. Those who experienced a structured interview without an explanation of its purpose scored lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview, but those who experienced a structured interview with an explanation of its purpose did not score lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview. Scores differed for females and Hispanics depending on the structure condition, but not in the same manner. Implications for recruitment, selection, and performance management are discussed.

AB - Structuring job interviews is a method of decreasing bias and increasing the predictive validity of job performance, but research suggests that applicants can react negatively to structure (Chapman & Zweig, 2005) and that negative attitudes about selection tools can predict performance (Hausknecht, Day, & Thomas, 2004). The current exploratory study investigates how structuring the job interview in conjunction with priming the ethnicity and sex of the applicant, and in some conditions providing an explanation of the structure, affected post-interview cognitive ability performance. Three levels of structure were randomly assigned. Those who experienced a structured interview without an explanation of its purpose scored lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview, but those who experienced a structured interview with an explanation of its purpose did not score lower than those who experienced an unstructured interview. Scores differed for females and Hispanics depending on the structure condition, but not in the same manner. Implications for recruitment, selection, and performance management are discussed.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84977643791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/piq.21218

DO - 10.1002/piq.21218

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 97

EP - 124

JO - Performance Improvement Quarterly

JF - Performance Improvement Quarterly

SN - 0898-5952

IS - 2

ER -