TY - JOUR
T1 - The nonexceptionalism thesis
T2 - How post-9/11 criminal justice measures fit in broader criminal justice
AU - Laguardia, Francesca
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by The Regents of the University of California.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Contrary to the assumption that "9/11 changed everything," post-2001 criminal justice practices in the area of terrorism show a surprising consistency with pre-2001 criminal justice practices. This article relies on an analysis of over 300 terrorism prosecutions between 2001 and 2010, as well as twenty full trial transcripts, content coding, and traditional legal analysis, to show the continuity of criminal justice over this time in regard to some of the most controversial supposed developments. This continuity belies the common assumption that current extreme policies and limitations on due process are a panicked response to the terror attacks of 2001. To the contrary, terrorism cases appear to have shed light on the direction in which the United States was heading for decades.
AB - Contrary to the assumption that "9/11 changed everything," post-2001 criminal justice practices in the area of terrorism show a surprising consistency with pre-2001 criminal justice practices. This article relies on an analysis of over 300 terrorism prosecutions between 2001 and 2010, as well as twenty full trial transcripts, content coding, and traditional legal analysis, to show the continuity of criminal justice over this time in regard to some of the most controversial supposed developments. This continuity belies the common assumption that current extreme policies and limitations on due process are a panicked response to the terror attacks of 2001. To the contrary, terrorism cases appear to have shed light on the direction in which the United States was heading for decades.
KW - Conspiracy
KW - Exceptionalism
KW - Surveillance
KW - Terrorism
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85025448633&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1525/nclr.2016.19.4.544
DO - 10.1525/nclr.2016.19.4.544
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85025448633
SN - 1933-4192
VL - 19
SP - 544
EP - 576
JO - New Criminal Law Review
JF - New Criminal Law Review
IS - 4
ER -