The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning

Teo Paoletti, Kevin C. Moore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Researchers have argued that covariational reasoning is foundational for learning a variety of mathematics topics. We extend prior research by examining two students’ covariational reasoning with attention to the extent they became consciously aware of the parametric nature of their reasoning. We first describe our theoretical background including different conceptions of covariation researchers have found useful when characterizing student reasoning. We then present two students’ activities during a teaching experiment in which they constructed and reasoned about covarying quantities. We highlight aspects of the students’ reasoning that we conjectured created an intellectual need that resulted in their constructing a parameter quantity or attribute, a need we explored in closing teaching episodes. We discuss implications of these results for perspectives on covariational reasoning, students’ understandings of graphs and parametric functions, and areas of future research.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)137-151
Number of pages15
JournalJournal of Mathematical Behavior
Volume48
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2017

Fingerprint

Reasoning
Students
student
Teaching
Research Personnel
Mathematics
Learning
mathematics
Attribute
experiment
Research
learning
Graph in graph theory
Experiments
Experiment

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Covariational reasoning
  • Parametric reasoning
  • Teaching experiment

Cite this

@article{079356659df543ba913d1c305a67bdd0,
title = "The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning",
abstract = "Researchers have argued that covariational reasoning is foundational for learning a variety of mathematics topics. We extend prior research by examining two students’ covariational reasoning with attention to the extent they became consciously aware of the parametric nature of their reasoning. We first describe our theoretical background including different conceptions of covariation researchers have found useful when characterizing student reasoning. We then present two students’ activities during a teaching experiment in which they constructed and reasoned about covarying quantities. We highlight aspects of the students’ reasoning that we conjectured created an intellectual need that resulted in their constructing a parameter quantity or attribute, a need we explored in closing teaching episodes. We discuss implications of these results for perspectives on covariational reasoning, students’ understandings of graphs and parametric functions, and areas of future research.",
keywords = "Cognition, Covariational reasoning, Parametric reasoning, Teaching experiment",
author = "Teo Paoletti and Moore, {Kevin C.}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "137--151",
journal = "Journal of Mathematical Behavior",
issn = "0732-3123",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning. / Paoletti, Teo; Moore, Kevin C.

In: Journal of Mathematical Behavior, Vol. 48, 01.12.2017, p. 137-151.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning

AU - Paoletti, Teo

AU - Moore, Kevin C.

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Researchers have argued that covariational reasoning is foundational for learning a variety of mathematics topics. We extend prior research by examining two students’ covariational reasoning with attention to the extent they became consciously aware of the parametric nature of their reasoning. We first describe our theoretical background including different conceptions of covariation researchers have found useful when characterizing student reasoning. We then present two students’ activities during a teaching experiment in which they constructed and reasoned about covarying quantities. We highlight aspects of the students’ reasoning that we conjectured created an intellectual need that resulted in their constructing a parameter quantity or attribute, a need we explored in closing teaching episodes. We discuss implications of these results for perspectives on covariational reasoning, students’ understandings of graphs and parametric functions, and areas of future research.

AB - Researchers have argued that covariational reasoning is foundational for learning a variety of mathematics topics. We extend prior research by examining two students’ covariational reasoning with attention to the extent they became consciously aware of the parametric nature of their reasoning. We first describe our theoretical background including different conceptions of covariation researchers have found useful when characterizing student reasoning. We then present two students’ activities during a teaching experiment in which they constructed and reasoned about covarying quantities. We highlight aspects of the students’ reasoning that we conjectured created an intellectual need that resulted in their constructing a parameter quantity or attribute, a need we explored in closing teaching episodes. We discuss implications of these results for perspectives on covariational reasoning, students’ understandings of graphs and parametric functions, and areas of future research.

KW - Cognition

KW - Covariational reasoning

KW - Parametric reasoning

KW - Teaching experiment

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85031029235&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003

M3 - Article

VL - 48

SP - 137

EP - 151

JO - Journal of Mathematical Behavior

JF - Journal of Mathematical Behavior

SN - 0732-3123

ER -