The problematic (a) - (h) in abstinence education

Michael Young, Eva Goldfarb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of the (a) - (h) definition of abstinence education contained in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. There are several issues involved, including: wording of the legislation and implementation by federal agencies and states, the restriction of access to information, the definition of the term sexual activity, the marriage standard, medical accuracy, and the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Federal involvement in abstinence education is discussed, including the Adolescent Family Life Act, Kendrick et al. v. Heckler and related suits, and abstinence education under welfare reform. Most Americans probably agree that young people would be well advised to delay the initiation of sexual behaviors that place them at risk for pregnancy and STDs. Nevertheless, there are significant concerns regarding the currently used federal definition of abstinence education. Those who believe that sexuality education should truly reflect the characteristics of a democratic society should consider working to overturn the language in this definition.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)156-160
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Sex Education and Therapy
Volume25
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jun 2000

Fingerprint

Education
Sexual Behavior
Access to Information
Constitution and Bylaws
Sexuality
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Marriage
Legislation
Language
Pregnancy

Cite this

@article{19cbf83490754046be854136aa439f2e,
title = "The problematic (a) - (h) in abstinence education",
abstract = "This paper provides an overview of the (a) - (h) definition of abstinence education contained in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. There are several issues involved, including: wording of the legislation and implementation by federal agencies and states, the restriction of access to information, the definition of the term sexual activity, the marriage standard, medical accuracy, and the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Federal involvement in abstinence education is discussed, including the Adolescent Family Life Act, Kendrick et al. v. Heckler and related suits, and abstinence education under welfare reform. Most Americans probably agree that young people would be well advised to delay the initiation of sexual behaviors that place them at risk for pregnancy and STDs. Nevertheless, there are significant concerns regarding the currently used federal definition of abstinence education. Those who believe that sexuality education should truly reflect the characteristics of a democratic society should consider working to overturn the language in this definition.",
author = "Michael Young and Eva Goldfarb",
year = "2000",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/01614576.2000.11074343",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "156--160",
journal = "Journal of Sex Education and Therapy",
issn = "0161-4576",
publisher = "Guilford Publications",
number = "2-3",

}

The problematic (a) - (h) in abstinence education. / Young, Michael; Goldfarb, Eva.

In: Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, Vol. 25, No. 2-3, 01.06.2000, p. 156-160.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The problematic (a) - (h) in abstinence education

AU - Young, Michael

AU - Goldfarb, Eva

PY - 2000/6/1

Y1 - 2000/6/1

N2 - This paper provides an overview of the (a) - (h) definition of abstinence education contained in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. There are several issues involved, including: wording of the legislation and implementation by federal agencies and states, the restriction of access to information, the definition of the term sexual activity, the marriage standard, medical accuracy, and the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Federal involvement in abstinence education is discussed, including the Adolescent Family Life Act, Kendrick et al. v. Heckler and related suits, and abstinence education under welfare reform. Most Americans probably agree that young people would be well advised to delay the initiation of sexual behaviors that place them at risk for pregnancy and STDs. Nevertheless, there are significant concerns regarding the currently used federal definition of abstinence education. Those who believe that sexuality education should truly reflect the characteristics of a democratic society should consider working to overturn the language in this definition.

AB - This paper provides an overview of the (a) - (h) definition of abstinence education contained in the 1996 Welfare Reform Act. There are several issues involved, including: wording of the legislation and implementation by federal agencies and states, the restriction of access to information, the definition of the term sexual activity, the marriage standard, medical accuracy, and the establishment clause of the First Amendment of the Constitution. Federal involvement in abstinence education is discussed, including the Adolescent Family Life Act, Kendrick et al. v. Heckler and related suits, and abstinence education under welfare reform. Most Americans probably agree that young people would be well advised to delay the initiation of sexual behaviors that place them at risk for pregnancy and STDs. Nevertheless, there are significant concerns regarding the currently used federal definition of abstinence education. Those who believe that sexuality education should truly reflect the characteristics of a democratic society should consider working to overturn the language in this definition.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0033761513&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/01614576.2000.11074343

DO - 10.1080/01614576.2000.11074343

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0033761513

VL - 25

SP - 156

EP - 160

JO - Journal of Sex Education and Therapy

JF - Journal of Sex Education and Therapy

SN - 0161-4576

IS - 2-3

ER -