The Procedurally Directive Approach to Teaching Controversial Issues

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recent articles on teaching controversial topics in schools have employed Michael Hand's distinction between "directive teaching," in which teachers attempt to persuade students of correct positions on topics that are not rationally controversial, and "nondirective teaching," in which teachers avoid persuading students on topics that are rationally controversial. However, the four methods of directive teaching discussed in the literature - explicit directive teaching, "steering," "soft-directive teaching," and "school ethos endorsement" - make rational persuasion problematic, if not self-defeating. In this essay, Maughn Rollins Gregory argues that "procedurally directive teaching" offers an alternative to such approaches because it derives from the intention to guide inquiry rather than to persuade. He demonstrates that the conceptual frameworks of perfectionism and antiperfectionism, which have been proposed for directive teaching on same-sex marriage, can instead be used to generate open questions for student inquiry, as can a third, civil rights framework. Given these considerations, Gregory maintains that pedagogical guidance on this topic should be procedurally directive rather than substantively directive. Further, the fact that legal, political, and ethics scholars disagree about which framework is more appropriate to the issue of same-sex marriage indicates that such arguments cannot be dispositive of the pedagogical issue of how to frame classroom discussions about it. Rather, students should inquire into this meta-level framing dispute for themselves.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)627-648
Number of pages22
JournalEducational Theory
Volume64
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Dec 2014

Fingerprint

Teaching
marriage
student
persuasion
teacher
civil rights
school
moral philosophy
classroom

Cite this

@article{96c84f542304498f8b8bf8c743d1dd0e,
title = "The Procedurally Directive Approach to Teaching Controversial Issues",
abstract = "Recent articles on teaching controversial topics in schools have employed Michael Hand's distinction between {"}directive teaching,{"} in which teachers attempt to persuade students of correct positions on topics that are not rationally controversial, and {"}nondirective teaching,{"} in which teachers avoid persuading students on topics that are rationally controversial. However, the four methods of directive teaching discussed in the literature - explicit directive teaching, {"}steering,{"} {"}soft-directive teaching,{"} and {"}school ethos endorsement{"} - make rational persuasion problematic, if not self-defeating. In this essay, Maughn Rollins Gregory argues that {"}procedurally directive teaching{"} offers an alternative to such approaches because it derives from the intention to guide inquiry rather than to persuade. He demonstrates that the conceptual frameworks of perfectionism and antiperfectionism, which have been proposed for directive teaching on same-sex marriage, can instead be used to generate open questions for student inquiry, as can a third, civil rights framework. Given these considerations, Gregory maintains that pedagogical guidance on this topic should be procedurally directive rather than substantively directive. Further, the fact that legal, political, and ethics scholars disagree about which framework is more appropriate to the issue of same-sex marriage indicates that such arguments cannot be dispositive of the pedagogical issue of how to frame classroom discussions about it. Rather, students should inquire into this meta-level framing dispute for themselves.",
author = "Maughn Gregory",
year = "2014",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/edth.12087",
language = "English",
volume = "64",
pages = "627--648",
journal = "Educational Theory",
issn = "0013-2004",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "6",

}

The Procedurally Directive Approach to Teaching Controversial Issues. / Gregory, Maughn.

In: Educational Theory, Vol. 64, No. 6, 01.12.2014, p. 627-648.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Procedurally Directive Approach to Teaching Controversial Issues

AU - Gregory, Maughn

PY - 2014/12/1

Y1 - 2014/12/1

N2 - Recent articles on teaching controversial topics in schools have employed Michael Hand's distinction between "directive teaching," in which teachers attempt to persuade students of correct positions on topics that are not rationally controversial, and "nondirective teaching," in which teachers avoid persuading students on topics that are rationally controversial. However, the four methods of directive teaching discussed in the literature - explicit directive teaching, "steering," "soft-directive teaching," and "school ethos endorsement" - make rational persuasion problematic, if not self-defeating. In this essay, Maughn Rollins Gregory argues that "procedurally directive teaching" offers an alternative to such approaches because it derives from the intention to guide inquiry rather than to persuade. He demonstrates that the conceptual frameworks of perfectionism and antiperfectionism, which have been proposed for directive teaching on same-sex marriage, can instead be used to generate open questions for student inquiry, as can a third, civil rights framework. Given these considerations, Gregory maintains that pedagogical guidance on this topic should be procedurally directive rather than substantively directive. Further, the fact that legal, political, and ethics scholars disagree about which framework is more appropriate to the issue of same-sex marriage indicates that such arguments cannot be dispositive of the pedagogical issue of how to frame classroom discussions about it. Rather, students should inquire into this meta-level framing dispute for themselves.

AB - Recent articles on teaching controversial topics in schools have employed Michael Hand's distinction between "directive teaching," in which teachers attempt to persuade students of correct positions on topics that are not rationally controversial, and "nondirective teaching," in which teachers avoid persuading students on topics that are rationally controversial. However, the four methods of directive teaching discussed in the literature - explicit directive teaching, "steering," "soft-directive teaching," and "school ethos endorsement" - make rational persuasion problematic, if not self-defeating. In this essay, Maughn Rollins Gregory argues that "procedurally directive teaching" offers an alternative to such approaches because it derives from the intention to guide inquiry rather than to persuade. He demonstrates that the conceptual frameworks of perfectionism and antiperfectionism, which have been proposed for directive teaching on same-sex marriage, can instead be used to generate open questions for student inquiry, as can a third, civil rights framework. Given these considerations, Gregory maintains that pedagogical guidance on this topic should be procedurally directive rather than substantively directive. Further, the fact that legal, political, and ethics scholars disagree about which framework is more appropriate to the issue of same-sex marriage indicates that such arguments cannot be dispositive of the pedagogical issue of how to frame classroom discussions about it. Rather, students should inquire into this meta-level framing dispute for themselves.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926290424&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/edth.12087

DO - 10.1111/edth.12087

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84926290424

VL - 64

SP - 627

EP - 648

JO - Educational Theory

JF - Educational Theory

SN - 0013-2004

IS - 6

ER -