The relationship between masking and short-term consolidation during recall from visual working memory

Timothy J. Ricker, Joshua Sandry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The presentation of a similar but irrelevant stimulus immediately following presentation of a memory item is called masking. Masking is known to reduce performance on working memory tests. This is the type of memory used to hold information in mind for brief periods of time for use in ongoing cognition. Two approaches to understanding masking effects have been proposed in different literatures. Working memory researchers often assume that the reduction in working memory performance after masking is because masking interferes with a transient sensory representation that is needed to complete consolidation into a working memory state. Researchers focused on the attentional blink, a finding that attention cannot be directed to new stimuli during working memory consolidation, have an alternative theory. Attentional blink researchers assume that masking slows the short-term consolidation process, thereby extending the length of the attentional blink. In two experiments, we contrast these two approaches to explaining masking effects and investigate the validity of both hypotheses. Some aspects of both approaches are validated, but neither theoretical perspective alone sufficiently explains the entire pattern of results.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Jan 2018

Fingerprint

Short-Term Memory
Consolidation
Attentional Blink
Data storage equipment
Research Personnel
Cognition
Masking
Visual Working Memory
Working Memory
Experiments

Keywords

  • Consolidation
  • Interference
  • Masking
  • Short-term memory
  • Visual memory
  • Working memory

Cite this

@article{f67bd23cca6a4952b7b2d75aef979d03,
title = "The relationship between masking and short-term consolidation during recall from visual working memory",
abstract = "The presentation of a similar but irrelevant stimulus immediately following presentation of a memory item is called masking. Masking is known to reduce performance on working memory tests. This is the type of memory used to hold information in mind for brief periods of time for use in ongoing cognition. Two approaches to understanding masking effects have been proposed in different literatures. Working memory researchers often assume that the reduction in working memory performance after masking is because masking interferes with a transient sensory representation that is needed to complete consolidation into a working memory state. Researchers focused on the attentional blink, a finding that attention cannot be directed to new stimuli during working memory consolidation, have an alternative theory. Attentional blink researchers assume that masking slows the short-term consolidation process, thereby extending the length of the attentional blink. In two experiments, we contrast these two approaches to explaining masking effects and investigate the validity of both hypotheses. Some aspects of both approaches are validated, but neither theoretical perspective alone sufficiently explains the entire pattern of results.",
keywords = "Consolidation, Interference, Masking, Short-term memory, Visual memory, Working memory",
author = "Ricker, {Timothy J.} and Joshua Sandry",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/nyas.13641",
language = "English",
journal = "Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences",
issn = "0077-8923",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

}

The relationship between masking and short-term consolidation during recall from visual working memory. / Ricker, Timothy J.; Sandry, Joshua.

In: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 01.01.2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The relationship between masking and short-term consolidation during recall from visual working memory

AU - Ricker, Timothy J.

AU - Sandry, Joshua

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - The presentation of a similar but irrelevant stimulus immediately following presentation of a memory item is called masking. Masking is known to reduce performance on working memory tests. This is the type of memory used to hold information in mind for brief periods of time for use in ongoing cognition. Two approaches to understanding masking effects have been proposed in different literatures. Working memory researchers often assume that the reduction in working memory performance after masking is because masking interferes with a transient sensory representation that is needed to complete consolidation into a working memory state. Researchers focused on the attentional blink, a finding that attention cannot be directed to new stimuli during working memory consolidation, have an alternative theory. Attentional blink researchers assume that masking slows the short-term consolidation process, thereby extending the length of the attentional blink. In two experiments, we contrast these two approaches to explaining masking effects and investigate the validity of both hypotheses. Some aspects of both approaches are validated, but neither theoretical perspective alone sufficiently explains the entire pattern of results.

AB - The presentation of a similar but irrelevant stimulus immediately following presentation of a memory item is called masking. Masking is known to reduce performance on working memory tests. This is the type of memory used to hold information in mind for brief periods of time for use in ongoing cognition. Two approaches to understanding masking effects have been proposed in different literatures. Working memory researchers often assume that the reduction in working memory performance after masking is because masking interferes with a transient sensory representation that is needed to complete consolidation into a working memory state. Researchers focused on the attentional blink, a finding that attention cannot be directed to new stimuli during working memory consolidation, have an alternative theory. Attentional blink researchers assume that masking slows the short-term consolidation process, thereby extending the length of the attentional blink. In two experiments, we contrast these two approaches to explaining masking effects and investigate the validity of both hypotheses. Some aspects of both approaches are validated, but neither theoretical perspective alone sufficiently explains the entire pattern of results.

KW - Consolidation

KW - Interference

KW - Masking

KW - Short-term memory

KW - Visual memory

KW - Working memory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85045194422&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/nyas.13641

DO - 10.1111/nyas.13641

M3 - Article

JO - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

JF - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

SN - 0077-8923

ER -