The role of user psychological contracts in the sustainability of social networks

Stanislav Mamonov, Marios Koufaris, Raquel Benbunan-Fich

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Many emergent ventures, such as social networks, leverage crowd-sourced information assets as essential pillars supporting their business models. The appropriation of rights to information assets through legal contracts often fails to prevent conflicts between the users and the companies that claim information rights. In this paper, we focus on social networks and examine why those conflicts arise and what their consequences are by drawing on psychological contract theory. We propose that intellectual property and privacy expectancies comprise core domains of psychological contracts between social networks and their users. In turn, perceived breaches of those expectancies trigger a psychological contract violation. We use the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect typology to define the user behavioral outcomes. We evaluated our framework by surveying 598 Facebook users. The data support our framework and indicate that perceived breaches of privacy and intellectual property rights generate the affective experience of a psychological contract violation, which is strongly associated with exit intentions.

Original languageEnglish
Article number10
Pages (from-to)218-248
Number of pages31
JournalCommunications of the Association for Information Systems
Volume40
Issue number1
StatePublished - 1 Apr 2017

Fingerprint

Sustainable development
Intellectual property
Surveying
Industry

Keywords

  • Information asset
  • Information exchange
  • Intellectual property
  • Privacy
  • Psychological contract
  • Social networks

Cite this

@article{9a5311d65ae64d6d9fea826cb84206ad,
title = "The role of user psychological contracts in the sustainability of social networks",
abstract = "Many emergent ventures, such as social networks, leverage crowd-sourced information assets as essential pillars supporting their business models. The appropriation of rights to information assets through legal contracts often fails to prevent conflicts between the users and the companies that claim information rights. In this paper, we focus on social networks and examine why those conflicts arise and what their consequences are by drawing on psychological contract theory. We propose that intellectual property and privacy expectancies comprise core domains of psychological contracts between social networks and their users. In turn, perceived breaches of those expectancies trigger a psychological contract violation. We use the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect typology to define the user behavioral outcomes. We evaluated our framework by surveying 598 Facebook users. The data support our framework and indicate that perceived breaches of privacy and intellectual property rights generate the affective experience of a psychological contract violation, which is strongly associated with exit intentions.",
keywords = "Information asset, Information exchange, Intellectual property, Privacy, Psychological contract, Social networks",
author = "Stanislav Mamonov and Marios Koufaris and Raquel Benbunan-Fich",
year = "2017",
month = "4",
day = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "218--248",
journal = "Communications of the Association for Information Systems",
issn = "1529-3181",
publisher = "Association for Information Systems",
number = "1",

}

The role of user psychological contracts in the sustainability of social networks. / Mamonov, Stanislav; Koufaris, Marios; Benbunan-Fich, Raquel.

In: Communications of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 40, No. 1, 10, 01.04.2017, p. 218-248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The role of user psychological contracts in the sustainability of social networks

AU - Mamonov, Stanislav

AU - Koufaris, Marios

AU - Benbunan-Fich, Raquel

PY - 2017/4/1

Y1 - 2017/4/1

N2 - Many emergent ventures, such as social networks, leverage crowd-sourced information assets as essential pillars supporting their business models. The appropriation of rights to information assets through legal contracts often fails to prevent conflicts between the users and the companies that claim information rights. In this paper, we focus on social networks and examine why those conflicts arise and what their consequences are by drawing on psychological contract theory. We propose that intellectual property and privacy expectancies comprise core domains of psychological contracts between social networks and their users. In turn, perceived breaches of those expectancies trigger a psychological contract violation. We use the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect typology to define the user behavioral outcomes. We evaluated our framework by surveying 598 Facebook users. The data support our framework and indicate that perceived breaches of privacy and intellectual property rights generate the affective experience of a psychological contract violation, which is strongly associated with exit intentions.

AB - Many emergent ventures, such as social networks, leverage crowd-sourced information assets as essential pillars supporting their business models. The appropriation of rights to information assets through legal contracts often fails to prevent conflicts between the users and the companies that claim information rights. In this paper, we focus on social networks and examine why those conflicts arise and what their consequences are by drawing on psychological contract theory. We propose that intellectual property and privacy expectancies comprise core domains of psychological contracts between social networks and their users. In turn, perceived breaches of those expectancies trigger a psychological contract violation. We use the exit, voice, loyalty, and neglect typology to define the user behavioral outcomes. We evaluated our framework by surveying 598 Facebook users. The data support our framework and indicate that perceived breaches of privacy and intellectual property rights generate the affective experience of a psychological contract violation, which is strongly associated with exit intentions.

KW - Information asset

KW - Information exchange

KW - Intellectual property

KW - Privacy

KW - Psychological contract

KW - Social networks

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85017454791&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85017454791

VL - 40

SP - 218

EP - 248

JO - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

JF - Communications of the Association for Information Systems

SN - 1529-3181

IS - 1

M1 - 10

ER -