The structured interview

Reducing biases toward job applicants with physical disabilities

Ellyn Brecher, Jennifer Bragger, Eugene Kutcher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Research shows that the traditional job interview is a poor indication of a candidate's potential. However, when employers structure the interview process, they are more effective at predicting success, forming consistent evaluations, and reducing discrimination. The current study tested whether the structured interview also serves to reduce biases involved in interviewing applicants who have a physical disability. In the non-structured interview, results showed that there was a leniency bias, where raters evaluated disabled candidates more positively than equally qualified non-disabled candidates. Structured interviews reduced this effect. These findings add to the support for the structured interview as a way of increasing fairness in employee selection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-170
Number of pages16
JournalEmployee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Sep 2006

Fingerprint

physical disability
applicant
Personnel
trend
interview
candidacy
job interview
fairness
indication
employer
discrimination
employee
Structured interview
evaluation

Keywords

  • Disabled
  • Discrimination
  • Employment selection
  • Structured interview

Cite this

@article{efd7a5fa56a44eb3bf70f5fe396ef43c,
title = "The structured interview: Reducing biases toward job applicants with physical disabilities",
abstract = "Research shows that the traditional job interview is a poor indication of a candidate's potential. However, when employers structure the interview process, they are more effective at predicting success, forming consistent evaluations, and reducing discrimination. The current study tested whether the structured interview also serves to reduce biases involved in interviewing applicants who have a physical disability. In the non-structured interview, results showed that there was a leniency bias, where raters evaluated disabled candidates more positively than equally qualified non-disabled candidates. Structured interviews reduced this effect. These findings add to the support for the structured interview as a way of increasing fairness in employee selection.",
keywords = "Disabled, Discrimination, Employment selection, Structured interview",
author = "Ellyn Brecher and Jennifer Bragger and Eugene Kutcher",
year = "2006",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s10672-006-9014-y",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "155--170",
journal = "Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal",
issn = "0892-7545",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "3",

}

The structured interview : Reducing biases toward job applicants with physical disabilities. / Brecher, Ellyn; Bragger, Jennifer; Kutcher, Eugene.

In: Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 01.09.2006, p. 155-170.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The structured interview

T2 - Reducing biases toward job applicants with physical disabilities

AU - Brecher, Ellyn

AU - Bragger, Jennifer

AU - Kutcher, Eugene

PY - 2006/9/1

Y1 - 2006/9/1

N2 - Research shows that the traditional job interview is a poor indication of a candidate's potential. However, when employers structure the interview process, they are more effective at predicting success, forming consistent evaluations, and reducing discrimination. The current study tested whether the structured interview also serves to reduce biases involved in interviewing applicants who have a physical disability. In the non-structured interview, results showed that there was a leniency bias, where raters evaluated disabled candidates more positively than equally qualified non-disabled candidates. Structured interviews reduced this effect. These findings add to the support for the structured interview as a way of increasing fairness in employee selection.

AB - Research shows that the traditional job interview is a poor indication of a candidate's potential. However, when employers structure the interview process, they are more effective at predicting success, forming consistent evaluations, and reducing discrimination. The current study tested whether the structured interview also serves to reduce biases involved in interviewing applicants who have a physical disability. In the non-structured interview, results showed that there was a leniency bias, where raters evaluated disabled candidates more positively than equally qualified non-disabled candidates. Structured interviews reduced this effect. These findings add to the support for the structured interview as a way of increasing fairness in employee selection.

KW - Disabled

KW - Discrimination

KW - Employment selection

KW - Structured interview

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33751544786&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s10672-006-9014-y

DO - 10.1007/s10672-006-9014-y

M3 - Article

VL - 18

SP - 155

EP - 170

JO - Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

JF - Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

SN - 0892-7545

IS - 3

ER -