The utility of the MMPI-2 criminal offender infrequency (Fc) scale in the detection of malingering in criminal defendants

Virginia Barber-Rioja, Tina Zottoli, L. Thomaskucharski, Scott Duncan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Recognizing that nonmalingering criminal subjects often elevate both the Infrequency (F) and Infrequency Psychopathology (Fp) scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 (MMPI-2), Megargee (2004) developed the Criminal Offender Infrequency (Fc) scale, which includes items infrequently endorsed by criminal offenders. This study compared MMPI-2 F, F(p), Fb and Fc elevations of criminal defendants who classified as malingering or not malingering using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS). Results of Logistic Regression Analyses suggested that the Fc scale performed better than F(p) and Fb, and at least as good as F in the detection of malingering in this forensic sample. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Validity Values for F, Fp and Fc are provided.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)16-24
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Forensic Mental Health
Volume8
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 22 Jul 2009

Fingerprint

Malingering
MMPI
Psychopathology
Logistic Models
Regression Analysis
Interviews
Sensitivity and Specificity

Keywords

  • Assessment of malingering
  • Criminal defendants
  • Fc (Criminal Offender Infrequency) scale
  • Malingering
  • MMPI-2

Cite this

@article{cbb3cd35bdda4d589b489948f8879a84,
title = "The utility of the MMPI-2 criminal offender infrequency (Fc) scale in the detection of malingering in criminal defendants",
abstract = "Recognizing that nonmalingering criminal subjects often elevate both the Infrequency (F) and Infrequency Psychopathology (Fp) scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 (MMPI-2), Megargee (2004) developed the Criminal Offender Infrequency (Fc) scale, which includes items infrequently endorsed by criminal offenders. This study compared MMPI-2 F, F(p), Fb and Fc elevations of criminal defendants who classified as malingering or not malingering using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS). Results of Logistic Regression Analyses suggested that the Fc scale performed better than F(p) and Fb, and at least as good as F in the detection of malingering in this forensic sample. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Validity Values for F, Fp and Fc are provided.",
keywords = "Assessment of malingering, Criminal defendants, Fc (Criminal Offender Infrequency) scale, Malingering, MMPI-2",
author = "Virginia Barber-Rioja and Tina Zottoli and L. Thomaskucharski and Scott Duncan",
year = "2009",
month = "7",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1080/14999010903014689",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "16--24",
journal = "International Journal of Forensic Mental Health",
issn = "1499-9013",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

The utility of the MMPI-2 criminal offender infrequency (Fc) scale in the detection of malingering in criminal defendants. / Barber-Rioja, Virginia; Zottoli, Tina; Thomaskucharski, L.; Duncan, Scott.

In: International Journal of Forensic Mental Health, Vol. 8, No. 1, 22.07.2009, p. 16-24.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - The utility of the MMPI-2 criminal offender infrequency (Fc) scale in the detection of malingering in criminal defendants

AU - Barber-Rioja, Virginia

AU - Zottoli, Tina

AU - Thomaskucharski, L.

AU - Duncan, Scott

PY - 2009/7/22

Y1 - 2009/7/22

N2 - Recognizing that nonmalingering criminal subjects often elevate both the Infrequency (F) and Infrequency Psychopathology (Fp) scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 (MMPI-2), Megargee (2004) developed the Criminal Offender Infrequency (Fc) scale, which includes items infrequently endorsed by criminal offenders. This study compared MMPI-2 F, F(p), Fb and Fc elevations of criminal defendants who classified as malingering or not malingering using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS). Results of Logistic Regression Analyses suggested that the Fc scale performed better than F(p) and Fb, and at least as good as F in the detection of malingering in this forensic sample. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Validity Values for F, Fp and Fc are provided.

AB - Recognizing that nonmalingering criminal subjects often elevate both the Infrequency (F) and Infrequency Psychopathology (Fp) scales of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory- 2 (MMPI-2), Megargee (2004) developed the Criminal Offender Infrequency (Fc) scale, which includes items infrequently endorsed by criminal offenders. This study compared MMPI-2 F, F(p), Fb and Fc elevations of criminal defendants who classified as malingering or not malingering using the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS). Results of Logistic Regression Analyses suggested that the Fc scale performed better than F(p) and Fb, and at least as good as F in the detection of malingering in this forensic sample. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Validity Values for F, Fp and Fc are provided.

KW - Assessment of malingering

KW - Criminal defendants

KW - Fc (Criminal Offender Infrequency) scale

KW - Malingering

KW - MMPI-2

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85023807364&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14999010903014689

DO - 10.1080/14999010903014689

M3 - Article

VL - 8

SP - 16

EP - 24

JO - International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

JF - International Journal of Forensic Mental Health

SN - 1499-9013

IS - 1

ER -