The value relevance of corporate restructuring charges

Bikki Jaggi, Beixin Lin, Suresh Govindaraj, Picheng Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We document in this study that investors react positively to restructuring that is expected to be successful in improving firm performance. Investors' reaction is significantly negative to unsuccessful firms when the magnitude of restructuring charges is high. Our results also show that investors' reaction is significantly positive to restructuring that is intended to save costs through "workforce reduction" and "facility closings/ consolidations", but it is insignificant when restructuring is undertaken to recognize decline in asset values by asset write-offs and/or write-downs. Investor reaction is measured by 12-month buy-and-hold abnormal returns, whereas successful restructuring to improve the firm performance is based on the change in operating performance, measured by the industry-adjusted return on equity (ROE), over two subsequent years after restructuring.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)101-128
Number of pages28
JournalReview of Quantitative Finance and Accounting
Volume32
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2009

Fingerprint

Value relevance
Corporate restructuring
Restructuring charges
Investors
Firm performance
Asset value
Industry
Write-offs
Workforce
Operating performance
Assets
Return on equity
Costs
Consolidation
Abnormal returns

Keywords

  • Facilities closings
  • Restructuring charges
  • Value relevance
  • Workforce reduction

Cite this

Jaggi, Bikki ; Lin, Beixin ; Govindaraj, Suresh ; Lee, Picheng. / The value relevance of corporate restructuring charges. In: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting. 2009 ; Vol. 32, No. 2. pp. 101-128.
@article{8847732440fd4c78b9c4d21747634e89,
title = "The value relevance of corporate restructuring charges",
abstract = "We document in this study that investors react positively to restructuring that is expected to be successful in improving firm performance. Investors' reaction is significantly negative to unsuccessful firms when the magnitude of restructuring charges is high. Our results also show that investors' reaction is significantly positive to restructuring that is intended to save costs through {"}workforce reduction{"} and {"}facility closings/ consolidations{"}, but it is insignificant when restructuring is undertaken to recognize decline in asset values by asset write-offs and/or write-downs. Investor reaction is measured by 12-month buy-and-hold abnormal returns, whereas successful restructuring to improve the firm performance is based on the change in operating performance, measured by the industry-adjusted return on equity (ROE), over two subsequent years after restructuring.",
keywords = "Facilities closings, Restructuring charges, Value relevance, Workforce reduction",
author = "Bikki Jaggi and Beixin Lin and Suresh Govindaraj and Picheng Lee",
year = "2009",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11156-008-0088-5",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "101--128",
journal = "Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting",
issn = "0924-865X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "2",

}

The value relevance of corporate restructuring charges. / Jaggi, Bikki; Lin, Beixin; Govindaraj, Suresh; Lee, Picheng.

In: Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Vol. 32, No. 2, 01.02.2009, p. 101-128.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - The value relevance of corporate restructuring charges

AU - Jaggi, Bikki

AU - Lin, Beixin

AU - Govindaraj, Suresh

AU - Lee, Picheng

PY - 2009/2/1

Y1 - 2009/2/1

N2 - We document in this study that investors react positively to restructuring that is expected to be successful in improving firm performance. Investors' reaction is significantly negative to unsuccessful firms when the magnitude of restructuring charges is high. Our results also show that investors' reaction is significantly positive to restructuring that is intended to save costs through "workforce reduction" and "facility closings/ consolidations", but it is insignificant when restructuring is undertaken to recognize decline in asset values by asset write-offs and/or write-downs. Investor reaction is measured by 12-month buy-and-hold abnormal returns, whereas successful restructuring to improve the firm performance is based on the change in operating performance, measured by the industry-adjusted return on equity (ROE), over two subsequent years after restructuring.

AB - We document in this study that investors react positively to restructuring that is expected to be successful in improving firm performance. Investors' reaction is significantly negative to unsuccessful firms when the magnitude of restructuring charges is high. Our results also show that investors' reaction is significantly positive to restructuring that is intended to save costs through "workforce reduction" and "facility closings/ consolidations", but it is insignificant when restructuring is undertaken to recognize decline in asset values by asset write-offs and/or write-downs. Investor reaction is measured by 12-month buy-and-hold abnormal returns, whereas successful restructuring to improve the firm performance is based on the change in operating performance, measured by the industry-adjusted return on equity (ROE), over two subsequent years after restructuring.

KW - Facilities closings

KW - Restructuring charges

KW - Value relevance

KW - Workforce reduction

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=62749201052&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11156-008-0088-5

DO - 10.1007/s11156-008-0088-5

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:62749201052

VL - 32

SP - 101

EP - 128

JO - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

JF - Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

SN - 0924-865X

IS - 2

ER -