Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms

Ian A.G. Wilkinson, Alina Reznitskaya, Kristin Bourdage, Joseph Oyler, Monica Glina, Robert Drewry, Min Young Kim, Kathryn Nelson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

20 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we report findings from the second year of a three-year research and professional development program designed to help elementary school teachers engage in dialogic teaching to support the development of students’ argument literacy. We define argument literacy as the ability to comprehend and formulate arguments through speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The professional development program was focused on promoting teachers’ use of a specific type of talk called ‘inquiry dialogue’ to achieve the goal of developing students’ argument literacy. We used a single-group pretest-posttest design to assess the impact of the professional development on teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their enactment of inquiry dialogue in text-based discussions. Our analyses of videotaped discussions at the beginning and end of the year showed that there were substantial improvements in teachers’ facilitation of inquiry dialogue and in the quality of students’ argumentation during discussions. Contrary to expectations, however, there were no changes in teachers’ epistemology; teachers’ beliefs about knowledge and knowledge justification remained at a relativist stage throughout the course of the program, suggesting that teachers continued to view all opinions as equally valid and regard arguments and the use of reasons and evidence as idiosyncratic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-82
Number of pages18
JournalLanguage and Education
Volume31
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2 Jan 2017

Fingerprint

art
classroom
teacher
language
literacy
dialogue
elementary school teacher
student
argumentation
epistemology
Professional Development
Pedagogy
Teacher Beliefs
Language Arts
speaking
ability
Literacy
Teaching
evidence
Group

Keywords

  • Classroom dialogue
  • dialogic
  • teacher development

Cite this

Wilkinson, Ian A.G. ; Reznitskaya, Alina ; Bourdage, Kristin ; Oyler, Joseph ; Glina, Monica ; Drewry, Robert ; Kim, Min Young ; Nelson, Kathryn. / Toward a more dialogic pedagogy : changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. In: Language and Education. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 1. pp. 65-82.
@article{aa8e6f67f1334c56abd77a0ccd3ed4dd,
title = "Toward a more dialogic pedagogy: changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms",
abstract = "In this paper, we report findings from the second year of a three-year research and professional development program designed to help elementary school teachers engage in dialogic teaching to support the development of students’ argument literacy. We define argument literacy as the ability to comprehend and formulate arguments through speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The professional development program was focused on promoting teachers’ use of a specific type of talk called ‘inquiry dialogue’ to achieve the goal of developing students’ argument literacy. We used a single-group pretest-posttest design to assess the impact of the professional development on teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their enactment of inquiry dialogue in text-based discussions. Our analyses of videotaped discussions at the beginning and end of the year showed that there were substantial improvements in teachers’ facilitation of inquiry dialogue and in the quality of students’ argumentation during discussions. Contrary to expectations, however, there were no changes in teachers’ epistemology; teachers’ beliefs about knowledge and knowledge justification remained at a relativist stage throughout the course of the program, suggesting that teachers continued to view all opinions as equally valid and regard arguments and the use of reasons and evidence as idiosyncratic.",
keywords = "Classroom dialogue, dialogic, teacher development",
author = "Wilkinson, {Ian A.G.} and Alina Reznitskaya and Kristin Bourdage and Joseph Oyler and Monica Glina and Robert Drewry and Kim, {Min Young} and Kathryn Nelson",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "65--82",
journal = "Language and Education",
issn = "0950-0782",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Toward a more dialogic pedagogy : changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms. / Wilkinson, Ian A.G.; Reznitskaya, Alina; Bourdage, Kristin; Oyler, Joseph; Glina, Monica; Drewry, Robert; Kim, Min Young; Nelson, Kathryn.

In: Language and Education, Vol. 31, No. 1, 02.01.2017, p. 65-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Toward a more dialogic pedagogy

T2 - changing teachers’ beliefs and practices through professional development in language arts classrooms

AU - Wilkinson, Ian A.G.

AU - Reznitskaya, Alina

AU - Bourdage, Kristin

AU - Oyler, Joseph

AU - Glina, Monica

AU - Drewry, Robert

AU - Kim, Min Young

AU - Nelson, Kathryn

PY - 2017/1/2

Y1 - 2017/1/2

N2 - In this paper, we report findings from the second year of a three-year research and professional development program designed to help elementary school teachers engage in dialogic teaching to support the development of students’ argument literacy. We define argument literacy as the ability to comprehend and formulate arguments through speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The professional development program was focused on promoting teachers’ use of a specific type of talk called ‘inquiry dialogue’ to achieve the goal of developing students’ argument literacy. We used a single-group pretest-posttest design to assess the impact of the professional development on teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their enactment of inquiry dialogue in text-based discussions. Our analyses of videotaped discussions at the beginning and end of the year showed that there were substantial improvements in teachers’ facilitation of inquiry dialogue and in the quality of students’ argumentation during discussions. Contrary to expectations, however, there were no changes in teachers’ epistemology; teachers’ beliefs about knowledge and knowledge justification remained at a relativist stage throughout the course of the program, suggesting that teachers continued to view all opinions as equally valid and regard arguments and the use of reasons and evidence as idiosyncratic.

AB - In this paper, we report findings from the second year of a three-year research and professional development program designed to help elementary school teachers engage in dialogic teaching to support the development of students’ argument literacy. We define argument literacy as the ability to comprehend and formulate arguments through speaking, listening, reading, and writing. The professional development program was focused on promoting teachers’ use of a specific type of talk called ‘inquiry dialogue’ to achieve the goal of developing students’ argument literacy. We used a single-group pretest-posttest design to assess the impact of the professional development on teachers’ epistemological beliefs and their enactment of inquiry dialogue in text-based discussions. Our analyses of videotaped discussions at the beginning and end of the year showed that there were substantial improvements in teachers’ facilitation of inquiry dialogue and in the quality of students’ argumentation during discussions. Contrary to expectations, however, there were no changes in teachers’ epistemology; teachers’ beliefs about knowledge and knowledge justification remained at a relativist stage throughout the course of the program, suggesting that teachers continued to view all opinions as equally valid and regard arguments and the use of reasons and evidence as idiosyncratic.

KW - Classroom dialogue

KW - dialogic

KW - teacher development

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84987887502&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129

DO - 10.1080/09500782.2016.1230129

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84987887502

VL - 31

SP - 65

EP - 82

JO - Language and Education

JF - Language and Education

SN - 0950-0782

IS - 1

ER -