Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Traditional Versus Internet Media in a Restricted Information Environment: How Trust in the Medium Matters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We use original survey data from Malaysia to explore differences in how traditional and digital media shape the attitudes and behavior of citizens. In closed, and even semi-authoritarian, states such as Malaysia, the Internet, including social media, is often the only place for opposition-centered media to thrive. As a result, consumption of Internet media is related to dissident attitudes. We argue that this relationship, though, is mitigated by trust in the medium. Our results suggest: (1) trust in traditional and Internet media determines the frequency with which citizens use each corresponding medium to gather political information, (2) higher trust in traditional media is positively associated with attitudes about democratic conditions in Malaysia; the opposite is true for trust in Internet media, (3) trust in the traditional media is negatively related, and trust in Internet media is positively related to the inclination to protest, (4) the positive relationship between digital media consumption and this attitude is stronger for those who trust Internet media, and diminished among those who trust traditional media.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)401-422
Number of pages22
JournalPolitical Behavior
Volume41
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 15 Jun 2019

Keywords

  • Authoritarian governments
  • Critical information flows
  • Internet media
  • Malaysia
  • Media trust
  • Protest
  • Social media
  • Traditional media

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Traditional Versus Internet Media in a Restricted Information Environment: How Trust in the Medium Matters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this