Abstract
Abstract: We share results from a quasi-experimental study in which we compared achievement between traditional face-to-face and computer-based sections of Intermediate Algebra on a common multiple choice exam as well as performance on open-response tasks. Students in the computer-based group performed better on the final exam and were also more likely to correctly complete the open-response tasks than students in the traditional sections. However, the computer-based group showed limited ability to interpret an equation and relate it to a contextual situation as compared with the face-to-face group. Students in both groups showed limited ability to write algebraic equations to represent contextual situations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 13-30 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | PRIMUS |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 5 Jan 2015 |
Keywords
- Curriculum
- algebra and algebraic thinking
- post-secondary
- technology