TY - JOUR
T1 - Understanding lead exposure through data and domain expertise
T2 - Insights from New Jersey with a geographically weighted regression analysis
AU - Yu, Danlin
AU - Fabolude, Gift
AU - Knoble, Charles
AU - Vu, Anvy
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2025/8
Y1 - 2025/8
N2 - Lead contamination remains a persistent and dangerous threat, particularly affecting young children and vulnerable communities. This study aims to develop a comprehensive lead exposure risk map for New Jersey municipalities by integrating diverse lead contamination data and analyzing the spatial distribution and magnitude of lead exposure risks. Utilizing both data-driven and participatory approaches, we employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to create distinct multi-criteria lead exposure indices. Then, a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) analysis was conducted to explore the local variations in lead exposure and the factors influencing these risks using both indices. Our linear models indicate that both PCA and AHP-based indices effectively capture the essence of lead exposure in urban areas, with significant correlations (Adjusted R2 = 0.225 for PCA and 0.466 for AHP, p < 0.01) observed between the indices and socioeconomic factors, with poverty, percentage of people of color, and housing tenure consistently identified as critical local predictors. The GWR analysis revealed not only the local variability of these factors' influence on lead exposure, but also that incorporating stakeholder knowledge and expert input provides valuable insights that pure data-driven methods may overlook. The study revealed significant spatial variations in lead exposure across New Jersey, identifying localized risk hotspots in urban areas such as Newark. Socioeconomic disparities, particularly poverty levels, percentage of people of color, and rental housing rates, though having spatially varying influences on lead exposure, were found to have significantly influence nonetheless, highlighting important environmental justice concerns. Furthermore, combining expert-driven (AHP) and data-driven (PCA) indices provided complementary insights, emphasizing the value of integrating stakeholder expertise with empirical data for targeted public health interventions.
AB - Lead contamination remains a persistent and dangerous threat, particularly affecting young children and vulnerable communities. This study aims to develop a comprehensive lead exposure risk map for New Jersey municipalities by integrating diverse lead contamination data and analyzing the spatial distribution and magnitude of lead exposure risks. Utilizing both data-driven and participatory approaches, we employed Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to create distinct multi-criteria lead exposure indices. Then, a Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) analysis was conducted to explore the local variations in lead exposure and the factors influencing these risks using both indices. Our linear models indicate that both PCA and AHP-based indices effectively capture the essence of lead exposure in urban areas, with significant correlations (Adjusted R2 = 0.225 for PCA and 0.466 for AHP, p < 0.01) observed between the indices and socioeconomic factors, with poverty, percentage of people of color, and housing tenure consistently identified as critical local predictors. The GWR analysis revealed not only the local variability of these factors' influence on lead exposure, but also that incorporating stakeholder knowledge and expert input provides valuable insights that pure data-driven methods may overlook. The study revealed significant spatial variations in lead exposure across New Jersey, identifying localized risk hotspots in urban areas such as Newark. Socioeconomic disparities, particularly poverty levels, percentage of people of color, and rental housing rates, though having spatially varying influences on lead exposure, were found to have significantly influence nonetheless, highlighting important environmental justice concerns. Furthermore, combining expert-driven (AHP) and data-driven (PCA) indices provided complementary insights, emphasizing the value of integrating stakeholder expertise with empirical data for targeted public health interventions.
KW - Data-driven
KW - Experts' opinions
KW - Geographically weighted regression
KW - Lead exposure
KW - New Jersey
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105008766321
U2 - 10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108063
DO - 10.1016/j.eiar.2025.108063
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105008766321
SN - 0195-9255
VL - 115
JO - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
JF - Environmental Impact Assessment Review
M1 - 108063
ER -