Use of Comparative Case Study Methodology for US Public Health Policy Analysis

A Review

Lauren Dinour, Amy Kwan, Nicholas Freudenberg

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: There is growing recognition that policies influence population health, highlighting the need for evidence to inform future policy development and reform. Objectives: This review describes how comparative case study methodology has been applied to public health policy research and discusses the methodology's potential to contribute to this evidence. Methods: English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 1995 and 2012 were sought from 4 databases. Articles were included if they described comparative case studies addressing US public health policy. Two researchers independently assessed the 20 articles meeting review criteria. Main Outcome Measures: Case-related characteristics and research design tactics utilized to minimize threats to reliability and validity, such as the use of multiple sources of evidence and a case study protocol, were extracted from each article. Results: Although comparative case study methodology has been used to analyze a range of public health policies at all stages and levels, articles reported an average use of only 3.65 (out of 10) research design tactics. Conclusion: By expanding the use of accepted research design tactics, public health policy researchers can contribute to expanding the evidence needed to advance health-promoting policies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)81-89
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Public Health Management and Practice
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Policy Making
Public Policy
Health Policy
Public Health
Research Design
Research Personnel
Reproducibility of Results
Language
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Databases
Health

Keywords

  • comparative studies
  • health policy
  • public health
  • qualitative research

Cite this

@article{01d0fee3a691467787880c8fe2131b89,
title = "Use of Comparative Case Study Methodology for US Public Health Policy Analysis: A Review",
abstract = "Context: There is growing recognition that policies influence population health, highlighting the need for evidence to inform future policy development and reform. Objectives: This review describes how comparative case study methodology has been applied to public health policy research and discusses the methodology's potential to contribute to this evidence. Methods: English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 1995 and 2012 were sought from 4 databases. Articles were included if they described comparative case studies addressing US public health policy. Two researchers independently assessed the 20 articles meeting review criteria. Main Outcome Measures: Case-related characteristics and research design tactics utilized to minimize threats to reliability and validity, such as the use of multiple sources of evidence and a case study protocol, were extracted from each article. Results: Although comparative case study methodology has been used to analyze a range of public health policies at all stages and levels, articles reported an average use of only 3.65 (out of 10) research design tactics. Conclusion: By expanding the use of accepted research design tactics, public health policy researchers can contribute to expanding the evidence needed to advance health-promoting policies.",
keywords = "comparative studies, health policy, public health, qualitative research",
author = "Lauren Dinour and Amy Kwan and Nicholas Freudenberg",
year = "2017",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/PHH.0000000000000406",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "81--89",
journal = "Journal of Public Health Management and Practice",
issn = "1078-4659",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",
number = "1",

}

Use of Comparative Case Study Methodology for US Public Health Policy Analysis : A Review. / Dinour, Lauren; Kwan, Amy; Freudenberg, Nicholas.

In: Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.02.2017, p. 81-89.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Use of Comparative Case Study Methodology for US Public Health Policy Analysis

T2 - A Review

AU - Dinour, Lauren

AU - Kwan, Amy

AU - Freudenberg, Nicholas

PY - 2017/2/1

Y1 - 2017/2/1

N2 - Context: There is growing recognition that policies influence population health, highlighting the need for evidence to inform future policy development and reform. Objectives: This review describes how comparative case study methodology has been applied to public health policy research and discusses the methodology's potential to contribute to this evidence. Methods: English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 1995 and 2012 were sought from 4 databases. Articles were included if they described comparative case studies addressing US public health policy. Two researchers independently assessed the 20 articles meeting review criteria. Main Outcome Measures: Case-related characteristics and research design tactics utilized to minimize threats to reliability and validity, such as the use of multiple sources of evidence and a case study protocol, were extracted from each article. Results: Although comparative case study methodology has been used to analyze a range of public health policies at all stages and levels, articles reported an average use of only 3.65 (out of 10) research design tactics. Conclusion: By expanding the use of accepted research design tactics, public health policy researchers can contribute to expanding the evidence needed to advance health-promoting policies.

AB - Context: There is growing recognition that policies influence population health, highlighting the need for evidence to inform future policy development and reform. Objectives: This review describes how comparative case study methodology has been applied to public health policy research and discusses the methodology's potential to contribute to this evidence. Methods: English-language, peer-reviewed articles published between 1995 and 2012 were sought from 4 databases. Articles were included if they described comparative case studies addressing US public health policy. Two researchers independently assessed the 20 articles meeting review criteria. Main Outcome Measures: Case-related characteristics and research design tactics utilized to minimize threats to reliability and validity, such as the use of multiple sources of evidence and a case study protocol, were extracted from each article. Results: Although comparative case study methodology has been used to analyze a range of public health policies at all stages and levels, articles reported an average use of only 3.65 (out of 10) research design tactics. Conclusion: By expanding the use of accepted research design tactics, public health policy researchers can contribute to expanding the evidence needed to advance health-promoting policies.

KW - comparative studies

KW - health policy

KW - public health

KW - qualitative research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84992734401&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000406

DO - 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000406

M3 - Review article

VL - 23

SP - 81

EP - 89

JO - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

JF - Journal of Public Health Management and Practice

SN - 1078-4659

IS - 1

ER -