Using potential performance theory to analyze systematic and random factors in enumeration tasks

Gayle Hunt, Stephen Rice, David Trafimow, Joshua Sandry

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior research has shown that as the number of items being enumerated increases, performance decreases, especially when the amount of time is limited. Researchers studying nonverbal enumeration have found that random noise increases as a function of the number of items presented. Over a series of 2 experiments, the authors used potential performance theory to expand these findings and discover precisely how much random noise actually influences observed performance and what performance might look like in the absence of random factors. Participants briefly viewed a visual stimulus comprising a set of 4 to 9 dots presented horizontally (Experiment 1) or randomly (Experiment 2) on a computer monitor. Findings from both experiments indicate that the decrease in performance for larger set sizes resulted almost entirely from a reduction in consistency (or an increase in random noise), whereas potential performance remained fairly constant until the maximum set size.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)23-32
Number of pages10
JournalAmerican Journal of Psychology
Volume126
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 9 Apr 2013

Fingerprint

Research Personnel
Research
Performance Theory
Enumeration
Experiment

Cite this

@article{6e98d8fe12e9403483c2329fb24950c8,
title = "Using potential performance theory to analyze systematic and random factors in enumeration tasks",
abstract = "Prior research has shown that as the number of items being enumerated increases, performance decreases, especially when the amount of time is limited. Researchers studying nonverbal enumeration have found that random noise increases as a function of the number of items presented. Over a series of 2 experiments, the authors used potential performance theory to expand these findings and discover precisely how much random noise actually influences observed performance and what performance might look like in the absence of random factors. Participants briefly viewed a visual stimulus comprising a set of 4 to 9 dots presented horizontally (Experiment 1) or randomly (Experiment 2) on a computer monitor. Findings from both experiments indicate that the decrease in performance for larger set sizes resulted almost entirely from a reduction in consistency (or an increase in random noise), whereas potential performance remained fairly constant until the maximum set size.",
author = "Gayle Hunt and Stephen Rice and David Trafimow and Joshua Sandry",
year = "2013",
month = "4",
day = "9",
doi = "10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.1.0023",
language = "English",
volume = "126",
pages = "23--32",
journal = "The American journal of psychology",
issn = "0002-9556",
publisher = "University of Illinois Press",
number = "1",

}

Using potential performance theory to analyze systematic and random factors in enumeration tasks. / Hunt, Gayle; Rice, Stephen; Trafimow, David; Sandry, Joshua.

In: American Journal of Psychology, Vol. 126, No. 1, 09.04.2013, p. 23-32.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using potential performance theory to analyze systematic and random factors in enumeration tasks

AU - Hunt, Gayle

AU - Rice, Stephen

AU - Trafimow, David

AU - Sandry, Joshua

PY - 2013/4/9

Y1 - 2013/4/9

N2 - Prior research has shown that as the number of items being enumerated increases, performance decreases, especially when the amount of time is limited. Researchers studying nonverbal enumeration have found that random noise increases as a function of the number of items presented. Over a series of 2 experiments, the authors used potential performance theory to expand these findings and discover precisely how much random noise actually influences observed performance and what performance might look like in the absence of random factors. Participants briefly viewed a visual stimulus comprising a set of 4 to 9 dots presented horizontally (Experiment 1) or randomly (Experiment 2) on a computer monitor. Findings from both experiments indicate that the decrease in performance for larger set sizes resulted almost entirely from a reduction in consistency (or an increase in random noise), whereas potential performance remained fairly constant until the maximum set size.

AB - Prior research has shown that as the number of items being enumerated increases, performance decreases, especially when the amount of time is limited. Researchers studying nonverbal enumeration have found that random noise increases as a function of the number of items presented. Over a series of 2 experiments, the authors used potential performance theory to expand these findings and discover precisely how much random noise actually influences observed performance and what performance might look like in the absence of random factors. Participants briefly viewed a visual stimulus comprising a set of 4 to 9 dots presented horizontally (Experiment 1) or randomly (Experiment 2) on a computer monitor. Findings from both experiments indicate that the decrease in performance for larger set sizes resulted almost entirely from a reduction in consistency (or an increase in random noise), whereas potential performance remained fairly constant until the maximum set size.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84875785715&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.1.0023

DO - 10.5406/amerjpsyc.126.1.0023

M3 - Article

C2 - 23505956

AN - SCOPUS:84875785715

VL - 126

SP - 23

EP - 32

JO - The American journal of psychology

JF - The American journal of psychology

SN - 0002-9556

IS - 1

ER -